Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?
- From: "Bob May" <bobmay@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:30:13 -0700
Why use a 3mm effective EP to see the planet with good size when you can use
something larger with a lot better eye relief? The powers used on the
planets are usually up in the 300x and larger to get the planet to a ince
disk. A 600mm focal length means that you need a 2mm EP to get that much
power. Better to use someting much longer of a focal length so you can at
least look into the EP.
--
Why isn't there an Ozone Hole at the NORTH Pole?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?
- From: Mark S. Holden
- Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?
- References:
- Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?
- From: Mij Adyaw
- Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fixing a Cemented Doublet
- Next by Date: Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?
- Next by thread: Re: Why Longer Focal Length for Planetary?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|