Re: S & T uses low end paper

From: Milton Aupperle <spam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:54:43 GMT

In article <A0sGe.2482$7Q1.1335@xxxxxxxx>, astrojoe
<astrojoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Did anyone else notice the Sept 2005 issue of S & T switched to CHEAP
> coated paper. The black backgrounds are horrible. The Gallery in the
> rear of the issues has really bad printing results. The great pics by
> the amateur photographers are not in any way done justice with this bad
> reproduction.
>
> Joe
>

I noticed that too and I'm not really pleased.

Thankk goodness that Nationl Geographic doens't do that.

Milton Aupperle
www.outcastsoft.com
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: S & T uses low end paper
  - From: David Nakamoto

References:
- S & T uses low end paper
  - From: astrojoe

Prev by Date: Re: The pending expansion of Daylight Savings Time
Next by Date: Re: Photos of Del Cep Wanted
Previous by thread: S & T uses low end paper
Next by thread: Re: S & T uses low end paper
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: S & T uses low end paper
... Milton Aupperle wrote: ... coated paper. ... The black backgrounds are horrible. ... The Gallery in the rear of the issues has really bad printing results. ...
(sci.astro.amateur)
S & T uses low end paper
... Did anyone else notice the Sept 2005 issue of S & T switched to CHEAP coated paper. ... The black backgrounds are horrible. ... The Gallery in the rear of the issues has really bad printing results. ...
(sci.astro.amateur)