Re: S & T uses low end paper
- From: "David Nakamoto" <res07oeg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:36:55 GMT
If you two think this is not a change to the good, then visit the Skypub.org
website and lodge a cogent, tactfully written but firmly stated reply to the
Powers That Be. Complaining here doesn't do any good unless those Powers That
Be are monitoring this site, and in any case it shows a level of real concern to
complain directly to the source.
--- Dave
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pinprick holes in a colorless sky
Let inspired figures of light pass by
The Mighty Light of ten thousand suns
Challenges infinity, and is soon gone
david.nakamoto@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Milton Aupperle" <spam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:290720050954438325%spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <A0sGe.2482$7Q1.1335@xxxxxxxx>, astrojoe
> <astrojoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Did anyone else notice the Sept 2005 issue of S & T switched to CHEAP
>> coated paper. The black backgrounds are horrible. The Gallery in the
>> rear of the issues has really bad printing results. The great pics by
>> the amateur photographers are not in any way done justice with this bad
>> reproduction.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>
> I noticed that too and I'm not really pleased.
>
> Thankk goodness that Nationl Geographic doens't do that.
>
> Milton Aupperle
> www.outcastsoft.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: S & T uses low end paper
- From: eawckyegcy
- Re: S & T uses low end paper
- From: Doink
- Re: S & T uses low end paper
- References:
- S & T uses low end paper
- From: astrojoe
- Re: S & T uses low end paper
- From: Milton Aupperle
- S & T uses low end paper
- Prev by Date: Re: Seeing conditions in Irvine tonight
- Next by Date: Re: UFO Above Rosamond
- Previous by thread: Re: S & T uses low end paper
- Next by thread: Re: S & T uses low end paper
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|