Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: "matt" <electro_optic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:45:33 -0400
Ed Majden wrote in message ...
>in article dgfpso$o78$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Malcolm Stewart at
>malcolm_stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 9/16/05 18:00:
>
>> <Havriliak@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1126905471.491937.86980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Boy is that stuff expensive
>>
>> Interesting -
>> a few years ago I bought an old surveying subtense bar which contains two
>> invar rods holding surveying targets set precisely 2m apart. It cost me
>> little more than 2x the currently listed cost of the invar rods, and I
had
>> no idea that invar was in this league, nor that invar was officially
graded
>> as "Harmful".
>
> Expensive is right! WOW! I didn't know it was harmful either! I'd
>better try something less harmful. Thanks to all for the information.
>
>Ed
>
well, try then a combination carbon fiber + kevlar epoxy composite . It can
get to extremely low and controlled CTE . You can also mold the part easily.
best regards,
matt tudor
.
- References:
- Invar low expansion metal
- From: Ed Majden
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: Tom Hise
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: Havriliak
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: Malcolm Stewart
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: Ed Majden
- Invar low expansion metal
- Prev by Date: Re: Invar low expansion metal
- Next by Date: Re: Old Timers Only
- Previous by thread: Re: Invar low expansion metal
- Next by thread: Re: Invar low expansion metal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|