Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: Ed Majden <epmajden@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:29:46 GMT
in article dgfpso$o78$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Malcolm Stewart at
malcolm_stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 9/16/05 18:00:
> <Havriliak@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1126905471.491937.86980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Boy is that stuff expensive
>
> Interesting -
> a few years ago I bought an old surveying subtense bar which contains two
> invar rods holding surveying targets set precisely 2m apart. It cost me
> little more than 2x the currently listed cost of the invar rods, and I had
> no idea that invar was in this league, nor that invar was officially graded
> as "Harmful".
Expensive is right! WOW! I didn't know it was harmful either! I'd
better try something less harmful. Thanks to all for the information.
Ed
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: Larry Bourdillon
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: matt
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- References:
- Invar low expansion metal
- From: Ed Majden
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: Tom Hise
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: Havriliak
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: Malcolm Stewart
- Invar low expansion metal
- Prev by Date: Re: Invar low expansion metal
- Next by Date: Re: Invar low expansion metal
- Previous by thread: Re: Invar low expansion metal
- Next by thread: Re: Invar low expansion metal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|