Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: "Malcolm Stewart" <malcolm_stewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 02:00:31 +0100
<Havriliak@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1126905471.491937.86980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Boy is that stuff expensive
Interesting -
a few years ago I bought an old surveying subtense bar which contains two
invar rods holding surveying targets set precisely 2m apart. It cost me
little more than 2x the currently listed cost of the invar rods, and I had
no idea that invar was in this league, nor that invar was officially graded
as "Harmful".
--
M Stewart
Milton Keynes, UK
http://www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk/oddimage.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: Ed Majden
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- References:
- Invar low expansion metal
- From: Ed Majden
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: Tom Hise
- Re: Invar low expansion metal
- From: Havriliak
- Invar low expansion metal
- Prev by Date: Re: back to the moon ....
- Next by Date: Re: Invar low expansion metal
- Previous by thread: Re: Invar low expansion metal
- Next by thread: Re: Invar low expansion metal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|