Re: Porr images with 20D/C90

Well, maybe, but the image looks reasonably well exposed. I looked at
the wrong EXIF, BTW . . . the exposure was actually 1/800 at ISO 1600.
No wonder the thing looks noisy. I can't tell whether the lack of
sharpness is camera shake or poor focus I've uploaded the image
here:

http://home.comcast.net/~jgates777/Moon.html

I neglected to say in my original message that I was using an Olympus
Varimgni right angle finder attached to the camera. This gives a 2.5x
magnification of the viewfinder, and I got the focus as sharp as I
could. The view through the 20D viewfinder is horrible, though . . . I
wish the screen had at least a small spot of fine-grained matte.

Thanks for the tip on the Hartmann mask. I'll try it.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: New Digital Camra
    ... corrected (unless camera shake is excessive) when adjusting the shots ... Actually sharpness can not be corrected in the manner you suggest. ... I do even auto focus is impossible. ... You can enlarge images 400 percent on my camera LCD but ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: Tripod vs hand held for sharp photos
    ... image is, i.e. less 'base blur', the more critical is camera shake. ... But stitching photos gets the same effect, a larger sensor as it were. ... What I have tried to show is that a tripod has very little ... Reasonable hand held shots are perfectly acceptable, sharpness wise for ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: 1.5X Sensors VS. Full Frame and other questions...
    ... That seems to be a disingenuous, misleading question. ... able to figure out what is producing the lack of sharpness. ... Blurring due to camera shake should be easily ... distinguished from blurring due to other causes. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
Loading