Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?
- From: roblane <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 08:49:33 -0500
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:17:31 -0700, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx wrote:
> The ETX-125 is not just a few bucks more, it is around a thousand
> dollars, more than double. As an EX- ETX-125 owner, there are several
> reasons I do not recommend this scope as a first serious scope.
Thanks. Point taken. Now I no longer regret getting the 90 instead of the
125! (Moved up to LXD 10")
.
- References:
- Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?
- From: Glen Ilacqua
- Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?
- From: Morris Jones
- Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?
- From: Glen Ilacqua
- Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?
- From: roblane
- Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?
- From: jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
- Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?
- Prev by Date: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Next by Date: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?
- Next by thread: Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|