Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: brian@xxxxxxx (Brian Tung)
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:35:35 +0000 (UTC)
Richard F.L.R. Snashall wrote:
> Ah, yes, the old double negative trick. Missed it by that much!
Sorry about that, Chief.
(RIP D.A.)
--
Brian Tung <brian@xxxxxxx>
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: rat ~( );>
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- References:
- Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: Glen Ilacqua
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: Richard F.L.R.Snashall
- Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Prev by Date: Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT
- Next by Date: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Previous by thread: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Next by thread: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|