Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: "rat ~( );>" <ratboy99@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2005 22:41:12 -0700
<<That's totally unfair to the APOs. A $100,000 car is quite
unabashedly
a vanity purchase -- it has no practical advantage over a $25,000 car.
>>
Unless it is a new Corvette. $65k, 505 HP, 135 lb frame. 0-60 in 3.5,
quater mile in what? I forget. Why would anyone want to spend over
twice as much on one of those stuck-up Italian POS? I'm saving up for a
Chevy.
rat
~( );>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: Mij Adyaw
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: Kevin M. Vernon
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- References:
- Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: Glen Ilacqua
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: Stephen Paul
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: tony_flanders
- Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Prev by Date: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Next by Date: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Previous by thread: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Next by thread: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Index(es):