Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: "rat ~( );>" <ratboy99@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2005 22:37:42 -0700
<<I think Rat was just responding in a humorous fashion to what he
perceived
as a troll. Of course, it would be confusing to a newbie that didn't
understand usenet dynamics. >>
Thank you. Actually it was just in a humorous fashion period. I gave up
long ago trying to figure out who the trolls are. You've got to admit
however, after seeing this question posed so many times it does lend
itself to the occasional light response. I thought I did pretty good.
rat
~( );>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- References:
- Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: Glen Ilacqua
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: rat ~( );>
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: tony_flanders
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: Bill Tschumy
- Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Prev by Date: Re: Ok, so who's planet or satillite?
- Next by Date: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Previous by thread: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Next by thread: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|