Re: New York City light pollution question
- From: "Van Guard" <Vanguard@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:38:33 -0500
<offaxis2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1128000794.757095.280110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The lights did not completely go out in the NYC area that is why you
> did not see a full sky of stars. Air pollution had zero to do with
> (jeeze what a stupid notion). Almost all of northern NJ had power and
> the skyglow from those lights were enough harm views all over the five
> boroughs of NYC, and Westchester.
> look at the satellite pics form that night and you will see a huge
> swatch of lit up land south of NYC. If you looked west or south west
> the sky was no where near as dark as it should have been but it
> gradually got darker as you looked east and north. That is why you
> didn't experience a perfect dark sky in NYC.
>
Here's a good page that illustrates your point:
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/photos/blackout.html
I lived in Fairfield County, CT, at the time and, though we were blacked
out, I don't recal dramatically brighter skies.
.
- References:
- New York City light pollution question
- From: Nero
- Re: New York City light pollution question
- From: offaxis2
- New York City light pollution question
- Prev by Date: Re: New York City light pollution question
- Next by Date: Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT
- Previous by thread: Re: New York City light pollution question
- Next by thread: Re: New York City light pollution question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|