Re: New York City light pollution question
- From: Chris L Peterson <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:08:33 GMT
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:19:44 GMT, Fred Garvin <garv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Air pollution would certainly have a bit to do with it.
Not just pollution (which implies man-made contaminants), but natural
components such as water vapor and droplets, pollen, dust, etc. These
things are quite prevalent in air in that area, and serve to amplify the
effects of even small amount of remaining light, or of more distant
light sources.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
.
- References:
- Re: New York City light pollution question
- From: offaxis2
- Re: New York City light pollution question
- From: Fred Garvin
- Re: New York City light pollution question
- Prev by Date: Re: LX200 focusing issue
- Next by Date: Re: LX200 focusing issue
- Previous by thread: Re: New York City light pollution question
- Next by thread: Re: New York City light pollution question
- Index(es):