Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: "Mij Adyaw" <mijadyaw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:11:22 -0700
The Chevy is only the start. They you will need to afford the gas. :-)
"rat ~( );>" <ratboy99@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1127972472.760777.276590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <<That's totally unfair to the APOs. A $100,000 car is quite
> unabashedly
> a vanity purchase -- it has no practical advantage over a $25,000 car.
>>>
>
> Unless it is a new Corvette. $65k, 505 HP, 135 lb frame. 0-60 in 3.5,
> quater mile in what? I forget. Why would anyone want to spend over
> twice as much on one of those stuck-up Italian POS? I'm saving up for a
> Chevy.
>
> rat
> ~( );>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: adm
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- References:
- Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: Glen Ilacqua
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: Stephen Paul
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: tony_flanders
- Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- From: rat ~( );>
- Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Prev by Date: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Next by Date: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Previous by thread: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Next by thread: Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|