sci.astro.amateur

• Date Index

---

• Vixen Hand Controler DMD-2 Power supply ?, Mark Diegel
• Zodiac Rhyme, tony_flanders
  • Re: Zodiac Rhyme, Brian Tung
    • Re: Zodiac Rhyme, Bill Owen
      • Re: Zodiac Rhyme, Brian Tung
• New Issue of The Journal of Double Star Observations (free), RMOLLISE
• Re: Messier Labels for The Sky V, W. Watson
  • Re: Messier Labels for The Sky V, W. Watson
    • Re: Messier Labels for The Sky V, Jeff Polston
• Re: Buying from Online or Local Retailer?, Pierre Vandevennne
  • Re: Buying from Online or Local Retailer?, g626700-groups
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Buying from Online or Local Retailer?, John Nichols
  • Re: Buying from Online or Local Retailer?, laura halliday
    • Re: Buying from Online or Local Retailer?, Glen Ilacqua
  • Re: Buying from Online or Local Retailer?, Glen Ilacqua
• Catching Up To Mars: Seeing got pretty good the other night, so..., Uncle Bob
• prom in waiting for Monday's solar eclipse, nytecam
• SCT Crayford, Tom
  • Re: SCT Crayford, George
• Out in Long Island, Nero
  • Re: Out in Long Island, Howard Lester
    • Message not available
      • Re: Out in Long Island, Howard Lester
      • Re: Out in Long Island, Howard Lester
      • Re: Out in Long Island, Bill Becker
      • Re: Out in Long Island, Jan Owen
      • Re: Out in Long Island, Howard Lester
      • Re: Out in Long Island, Nero
  • Re: Out in Long Island, katrinaxx
• Re: Clausing, Martin
• Thierry Hassid Computer Classes, thierryhassid
• Washington, DC Metro Area Observing, Will
  • Re: Washington, DC Metro Area Observing, Bert Hyman
    • Re: Washington, DC Metro Area Observing, Will
      • Re: Washington, DC Metro Area Observing, Davoud
• Computer Classes Hassid, thierryhassid
• LX200 focusing issue, Orion
  • Re: LX200 focusing issue, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: LX200 focusing issue, Gaz
      • Re: LX200 focusing issue, Orion
    • Re: LX200 focusing issue, Orion
• Re: 'Intelligent Design' becoming LAW!, jeff
• New York City light pollution question, Nero
  • Re: New York City light pollution question, Vernon
  • Re: New York City light pollution question, offaxis2
    • Re: New York City light pollution question, Van Guard
    • Re: New York City light pollution question, Fred Garvin
      • Re: New York City light pollution question, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: New York City light pollution question, clydec
    • Re: New York City light pollution question, Nero
      • Re: New York City light pollution question, clydec
      • Re: New York City light pollution question, Nero
• Celestron Ultima DX 10x50 Waterproof Binoculars, Brian Kastel
  • Re: Celestron Ultima DX 10x50 Waterproof Binoculars, Brian Kastel
    • Re: Celestron Ultima DX 10x50 Waterproof Binoculars, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Celestron Ultima DX 10x50 Waterproof Binoculars, Brian Kastel
      • Re: Celestron Ultima DX 10x50 Waterproof Binoculars, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Celestron Ultima DX 10x50 Waterproof Binoculars, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Celestron Ultima DX 10x50 Waterproof Binoculars, Brian Kastel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Celestron Ultima DX 10x50 Waterproof Binoculars, Brian Kastel
• Ok, so who's planet or satillite?, G
  • Re: Ok, so who's planet or satillite?, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Ok, so who's planet or satillite?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Ok, so who's planet or satillite?, G
      • Re: Ok, so who's planet or satillite?, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: Ok, so who's planet or satillite?, Hilton Evans
  • Re: Ok, so who's planet or satillite?, pjdd
  • Re: Ok, so who's planet or satillite?, G
  • Re: Ok, so who's planet or satillite?, John Savard
  • Re: Ok, so who's planet or satillite?, Fred Garvin
• planet photograpy., Jake
  • Re: planet photograpy., Chris L Peterson
• ISS/Shuttle were huge mistakes-NASA, Rich
  • Re: ISS/Shuttle were huge mistakes-NASA, Jake
  • Re: ISS/Shuttle were huge mistakes-NASA, urban astronomer
• Re: sunspot bullseye, John Schutkeker
• AD: For Sale, Starlord
• Re: anyone in Olympia WA area?, Wade A. Hilmo
  • Re: anyone in Olympia WA area?, Eric
    • Re: anyone in Olympia WA area?, Kruger Kid
• Bragging..., spiral_72
  • Re: Bragging..., Ed T
  • Re: Bragging..., jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
• Will a 8" LX3 wedge work with a 12" LX200?, craig510a3
  • Re: Will a 8" LX3 wedge work with a 12" LX200?, Terry A Haimann
    • Re: Will a 8" LX3 wedge work with a 12" LX200?, craig510a3
• 8 solar proms, nytecam
• andromeda - is it visible through binoculars?, Eric
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: andromeda - is it visible through binoculars?, elaich
  • Re: andromeda - is it visible through binoculars?, John Schutkeker
  • Message not available
    • Re: andromeda - is it visible through binoculars?, Morris Jones
      • Re: andromeda - is it visible through binoculars?, Eric
  • Message not available
    • Re: andromeda - is it visible through binoculars?, canopus56
• OOPS! Flocked Paper Adhesive Meets Primary, derek
  • Message not available
    • Re: OOPS! Flocked Paper Adhesive Meets Primary, MitchAlsup
      • Re: OOPS! Flocked Paper Adhesive Meets Primary, Jim Hewitt
• Camera tracker/mount info?, rcyoung
  • Re: Camera tracker/mount info?, Shawn
• A BIG space-based infra-red scope, Rich
• Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Glen Ilacqua
  • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, rat ~( );>
      • Message not available
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, JATO
      • Message not available
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, rat ~( );>
    • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, decaf
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Enyo
    • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, tony_flanders
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Rich
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Doink
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, rat ~( );>
  • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Larry G
  • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, szaki
  • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, tony_flanders
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Mark S. Holden
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Shawn
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Kevin M. Vernon
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, adm
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Pierre Vandevenne
  • Message not available
    • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Shneor
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, tony_flanders
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Richard F.L.R.Snashall
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Mark S. Holden
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Shneor
  • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, laura halliday
    • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Ed T
    • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, rat ~( );>
    • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, Shneor
      • Re: Expensive Small Aperture Refractor?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
• Meade 102ED APO versus Orion 100ED APO, tedkord
  • Re: Meade 102ED APO versus Orion 100ED APO, tedkord
  • Re: Meade 102ED APO versus Orion 100ED APO, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: Meade 102ED APO versus Orion 100ED APO, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Meade 102ED APO versus Orion 100ED APO, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: Meade 102ED APO versus Orion 100ED APO, tedkord
  • Re: Meade 102ED APO versus Orion 100ED APO, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Meade 102ED APO versus Orion 100ED APO, Mike Lewis
    • Re: Meade 102ED APO versus Orion 100ED APO, tedkord
    • Re: Meade 102ED APO versus Orion 100ED APO, tedkord
      • Re: Meade 102ED APO versus Orion 100ED APO, Mike Lewis
• Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, Glen Ilacqua
  • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, Mark S. Holden
  • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, Doink
    • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, Doink
      • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, Glen Ilacqua
    • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, Glen Ilacqua
  • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, Glen Ilacqua
  • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, Morris Jones
    • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, Glen Ilacqua
      • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, roblane
      • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, roblane
      • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, Tom Royer
  • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, szaki
  • Re: Is the ETX 90 AT a good first scope?, Kevin Schultz
• SPITZER AND HUBBLE FIND 'BIG BABY' GALAXIES IN NEWBORN UNIVERSE (STScI-PR05-28), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
• Re: Basic Astronomy Question 101, Brian Tung
  • Re: Basic Astronomy Question 101, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Basic Astronomy Question 101, Brian Tung
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Basic Astronomy Question 101, Brian Tung
    • Re: Basic Astronomy Question 101, Rob Johnson
  • Re: Basic Astronomy Question 101, Michael McCulloch
    • Message not available
      • Re: Basic Astronomy Question 101, Michael McCulloch
  • Re: Basic Astronomy Question 101, Michael McCulloch
  • Re: Basic Astronomy Question 101, Michael McCulloch
• Mars registax image, Jake
  • Re: Mars registax image, Doink
    • Re: Mars registax image, Jake
      • Re: Mars registax image, fm
  • Re: Mars registax image, Robin Leadbeater
    • Re: Mars registax image, Jake
      • Re: Mars registax image, Doink
      • Re: Mars registax image, Robin Leadbeater
• 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, g626700-groups
  • Re: 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
  • Re: 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
  • Re: 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, Doink
    • Re: 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, Doink
      • Re: 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
    • Re: 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, debtodd007
      • Re: 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
  • Re: 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, John Deer
    • Re: 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, g626700-groups
    • Re: 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
  • Re: 10" F4.7 vs. 8"F6, Larry G
• polar prom's 5th day, nytecam
• NGC recommendations for small scopes (??), boo
  • Re: NGC recommendations for small scopes (??), Shneor
  • Re: NGC recommendations for small scopes (??), laura halliday
  • Re: NGC recommendations for small scopes (??), Martin
    • Re: NGC recommendations for small scopes (??), Jan Owen
  • Re: NGC recommendations for small scopes (??), Ron B[ee]
    • Re: NGC recommendations for small scopes (??), Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: NGC recommendations for small scopes (??), rat ~( );>
  • Re: NGC recommendations for small scopes (??), Robert Sheaffer
• Thinking Big, Dobs That Is, Shawn
  • Re: Thinking Big, Dobs That Is, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Thinking Big, Dobs That Is, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
• Celestron SP-C102 Restoration Help, Mark Diegel
  • Re: Celestron SP-C102 Restoration Help, Ed T
    • Re: Celestron SP-C102 Restoration Help, Bill Becker
      • Re: Celestron SP-C102 Restoration Help, Brian Tung
      • Re: Celestron SP-C102 Restoration Help, eBay Victim
      • Re: Celestron SP-C102 Restoration Help, Ed T
• Re: Celestron will NOT ship to U.S. Service Members!, Davoud
• 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, ascocarp
  • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Mark D
    • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Doink
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, decaf
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Message not available
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Mark D
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, John Deer
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Stephen Paul
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Brian Tung
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Stephen Paul
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, William R. Mattil
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Stephen Paul
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Stephen Paul
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Stephen Paul
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, tony_flanders
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Stephen Paul
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Stephen Paul
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, tony_flanders
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, John Deer
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Stephen Paul
      • Message not available
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, William R. Mattil
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, tony_flanders
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, William R. Mattil
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, John Deer
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Howard Lester
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Jan Owen
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Doink
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Doink
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, eBay Victim
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, rat ~( );>
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Shady News
      • Message not available
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Howard Lester
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Stephen Paul
      • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Doink
  • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Michael Wood
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 8" SCT v. 11" SCT, Mark D
• Alaska Sky Photos Posted, Tom Polakis
  • Re: Alaska Sky Photos Posted, Davoud
  • Re: Alaska Sky Photos Posted, G
  • Re: Alaska Sky Photos Posted, Florian
• Re: Latest on Antares Petzvals?, Gobbletwo
  • Re: Latest on Antares Petzvals?, Ed T
    • Re: Latest on Antares Petzvals?, Doink
• Re: What percentage of stars are variable, Greg Crinklaw
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What percentage of stars are variable, canopus56
    • Re: What percentage of stars are variable, canopus56
  • Re: What percentage of stars are variable, Greg Crinklaw
  • Re: What percentage of stars are variable, Stupendous_Man
  • Re: What percentage of stars are variable, eBay Victim
• Re: Telescope upgrade ?, Stephen Paul
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, wdop8
    • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, laura halliday
      • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, wdop8
      • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, Tim Auton
      • Message not available
      • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, wdop8
      • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, laura halliday
      • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Telescope upgrade ?, wdop8
• Re: Visiting San Diego - observing advice pls, John Savard
  • Re: Visiting San Diego - observing advice pls, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Visiting San Diego - observing advice pls, Bob May
  • Re: Visiting San Diego - observing advice pls, Robert Sheaffer
• Re: Guidescopes?, J McBride
  • Re: Guidescopes?, Dennis Allen
• Re: Televue 85, Mij Adyaw
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Televue 85, Tim Killian
  • Re: Televue 85, Brian Tung
    • Re: Televue 85, Tim Killian
      • Re: Televue 85, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Televue 85, Brian Tung
      • Re: Televue 85, Tim Killian
      • Re: Televue 85, Brian Tung
      • Re: Televue 85, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Televue 85, Tim Killian
      • Re: Televue 85, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Televue 85, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Televue 85, Tim Killian
      • Re: Televue 85, Shawn
  • Re: Televue 85, szaki
    • Re: Televue 85, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Televue 85, rmorea
    • Re: Televue 85, rat ~( );>
  • Re: Televue 85, elaich
    • Re: Televue 85, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Televue 85, Mayer Wonga
      • Re: Televue 85, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Televue 85, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Televue 85, rat ~( );>
  • Re: Televue 85, clydec
    • Re: Televue 85, clydec
• starter, xargon
  • Re: starter, Doink
    • Re: starter, Brian Tung
  • Re: starter, starburst
  • Re: starter, Stephen Paul
    • Re: starter, xargon
      • Re: starter, xargon
• Just starting, bought new binocs, Ben S.
  • Re: Just starting, bought new binocs, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Just starting, bought new binocs, Dennis Woos
• Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., nairnk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., Blame Me!
    • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., Mark S. Holden
  • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., elaich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., Eric Erlenmeyer
    • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., Blame Me!
      • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., spaam_this
  • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., spaam_this
    • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., Blame Me!
      • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., spaam_this
      • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., spaam_this
      • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., Brian Tung
    • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., Blame Me!
      • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., dsmalln
      • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., eBay Victim
  • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., Coppy Littlehouse
    • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., Blame Me!
    • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., R/T
      • Re: Secret Bidding approved on Ebay ...., eBay Victim
• Solar promineces with the coronado PST, orion94nl
  • Re: Solar promineces with the coronado PST, Mayer Wonga
  • Re: Solar promineces with the coronado PST, Dave Mitsky
• A nice, cheap Cassegrain telescope system, Rich
  • Re: A nice, cheap Cassegrain telescope system, WA2GUF
  • Re: A nice, cheap Cassegrain telescope system, nick
  • Message not available
    • Re: A nice, cheap Cassegrain telescope system, Tim Killian
      • Re: A nice, cheap Cassegrain telescope system, John Savard
• Pretty wild theory, Rich
  • Re: Pretty wild theory, Mayer Wonga
• AAAA still around?, Mike Albrecht
  • Re: AAAA still around?, RMOLLISE
• Re: Wray refractor stolen in Chester, England, garry parker
• NASA gets the money for a Hubble fix!, Victor
  • Re: NASA gets the money for a Hubble fix!, Martin
    • Re: NASA gets the money for a Hubble fix!, Zarkovic
  • Re: NASA gets the money for a Hubble fix!, Hilton Evans
    • Re: NASA gets the money for a Hubble fix!, Tim Killian
      • Re: NASA gets the money for a Hubble fix!, Hilton Evans
• Sky Clocks MIA, Dave Jessie
  • Re: Sky Clocks MIA, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Sky Clocks MIA, Martin
    • Re: Sky Clocks MIA, Dave Jessie
• Re: Global warming on solar planets, Marty
  • Re: Global warming on solar planets, Paul Schlyter
    • Re: Global warming on solar planets, Dah_Rainbow_Mob
    • Re: Global warming on solar planets, alanmc95210
      • Re: Global warming on solar planets, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: Global warming on solar planets, Shawn
      • Re: Global warming on solar planets, alanmc95210
    • Re: Global warming on solar planets, alanmc95210
    • Re: Global warming on solar planets, alanmc95210
    • Re: Global warming on solar planets, alanmc95210
• Kill the Light, Save a Bird, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Kill the Light, Save a Bird, Jeff R
  • Re: Kill the Light, Save a Bird, Tim Killian
  • Re: Kill the Light, Save a Bird, boofreak
    • Re: Kill the Light, Save a Bird, Blame Me!
      • Message not available
      • Re: Kill the Light, Save a Bird, Shawn
    • Re: Kill the Light, Save a Bird, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Kill the Light, Save a Bird, Huh?
• Porr images with 20D/C90, jess
  • Re: Porr images with 20D/C90, Jeff R
    • Re: Porr images with 20D/C90, jess
      • Re: Porr images with 20D/C90, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Porr images with 20D/C90, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Re: Porr images with 20D/C90, Rob Johnson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Porr images with 20D/C90, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Porr images with 20D/C90, jess
      • Message not available
      • Re: Porr images with 20D/C90, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Porr images with 20D/C90, jess
• Re: Venus and Rocket, R
  • Re: Venus and Rocket, Starlord
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Venus and Rocket, Rob Johnson
• View it while you can...., Rich
  • Re: View it while you can...., Tim Killian
    • Re: View it while you can...., John Schutkeker
• Finding Extrema with Starry Night Pro, no
• Mars/Moon w/Ring, Starlord
• Tripod Opinions Wanted, Mike
  • Re: Tripod Opinions Wanted, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: Tripod Opinions Wanted, Doink
      • Re: Tripod Opinions Wanted, Uncle Bob
      • Re: Tripod Opinions Wanted, Doink
      • Re: Tripod Opinions Wanted, Stephen Paul
      • Message not available
      • Re: Modified DSLRs (was: Stephen Paul....), Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Modified DSLRs (was: Stephen Paul....), Stephen Paul
      • Re: Modified DSLRs (was: Stephen Paul....), Mike
      • Re: Modified DSLRs (was: Stephen Paul....), Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Tripod Opinions Wanted, Uncle Bob
      • Re: Tripod Opinions Wanted, Doink
  • Re: Tripod Opinions Wanted, Tim Killian
  • Re: Tripod Opinions Wanted, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Tripod Opinions Wanted, Mike
      • Re: Tripod Opinions Wanted, Stephen Paul
• An Hour of Astronomy on NPR this Tuesday, Magnificent Universe
  • Re: An Hour of Astronomy on NPR this Tuesday, Sam Wormley
    • Re: An Hour of Astronomy on NPR this Tuesday, Chris McMahan
• Rita's path, Mike Thomas
• Re: M-theory, fcathell
• Staying the course, Mike Thomas
• Use of Meade variable camera adapter, Sanjiv
• Re: Hi starlord, Starlord
• Re: Ambient Orb, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Ambient Orb, Eric Johnson
• Observing through hurricane eye, Mean Mr Mustard
  • Re: Observing through hurricane eye, dougspeterson
  • Re: Observing through hurricane eye, Sam Wormley
    • Message not available
      • Re: Observing through hurricane eye, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Staying the course, Mike Thomas
    • Re: Staying the course, Shawn
• Another big prom today (9-22), Michael McCulloch
  • Re: Another big prom today (9-22), Michael McCulloch
  • Re: Another big prom today (9-22), Dave Mitsky
    • Re: Another big prom today (9-22), Michael McCulloch
• Re: Most distant explosion observed, Brian Tung
  • Message not available
    • Re: Most distant explosion observed, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Re: Most distant explosion observed, Brian Tung
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Most distant explosion observed, Sam Wormley
• Amateurs & the Natioanl Virtual Observatory, Tom Kirke
• TX-LA border, Thomas Farrsby
• Puzzled by apparent size of M31., pjdd
  • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Greg Crinklaw
    • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Roger Hamlett
    • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Gaz
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Greg Crinklaw
  • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Ol' Duffer
    • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Larry Stedman
  • Message not available
    • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Stephen Paul
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Brian Tung
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., John Shakespeare
  • Message not available
    • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., brisk
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Greg Crinklaw
  • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Doink
    • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., The Grow Family
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., pjdd
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Doink
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., astronomer
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Puzzled by apparent size of M31., Shawn
• registax, Jake
  • Re: registax, Norbert
    • Re: registax, Jake
  • Re: registax, Craig M . Bobchin
    • Message not available
      • Re: registax, Craig M . Bobchin
  • Re: registax, Tim Oltrogge
    • Re: registax, Tim Oltrogge
• full speed ahead, Thomas Farrsby
• Re: Ford Observatory Breakin, rcyoung
  • Re: Ford Observatory Breakin, Larry Stedman
    • Re: Ford Observatory Breakin, John Schutkeker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ford Observatory Breakin, Tim Killian
  • Re: Ford Observatory Breakin, Wayne Howell
    • Message not available
      • Re: Ford Observatory Breakin, Wayne Howell
  • Re: Ford Observatory Breakin, Craig M . Bobchin
    • Message not available
      • Re: Ford Observatory Breakin, Larry Stedman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Ford Observatory Breakin, Harry F . Leopold
• why get a scope?, G
  • Re: why get a scope?, Jim Attfield
  • Re: why get a scope?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
  • Re: why get a scope?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: why get a scope?, David G. Nagel
  • Re: why get a scope?, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: why get a scope?, Paul Schlyter
  • Re: why get a scope?, Mike Reed
    • Re: why get a scope?, Marty
    • Re: why get a scope?, Pippen
  • Re: why get a scope?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: why get a scope?, Shneor
  • Re: why get a scope?, Shawn
  • Re: why get a scope?, lal_truckee
    • Re: why get a scope?, Shawn
  • Re: why get a scope?, elaich
    • Or you could - was: why get a scope?, Tim Killian
  • Re: why get a scope?, Tim Killian
  • Re: why get a scope?, G
    • Re: why get a scope?, Hilton Evans
      • Re: why get a scope?, G
      • Re: why get a scope?, Hilton Evans
      • Re: why get a scope?, RMOLLISE
  • Re: why get a scope?, Greg Crinklaw
    • Re: why get a scope?, Doink
      • Re: why get a scope?, Greg Crinklaw
  • Re: why get a scope?, szaki
    • Message not available
      • Re: why get a scope?, G
  • Re: why get a scope?, Yermiah
  • Re: why get a scope?, Doink
    • Re: why get a scope?, Stephen Paul
• Review of Showa Industry Co. Ltd. SD100 Apo refractor, Bernhard Rems
• Looking for Opinions on Takahashi Epsilon Astrographs, Tim Killian
  • Re: Looking for Opinions on Takahashi Epsilon Astrographs, Ed T
    • Re: Looking for Opinions on Takahashi Epsilon Astrographs, Tim Killian
    • Re: Looking for Opinions on Takahashi Epsilon Astrographs, Tim Killian
• Re: Which One Should I Buy?, William Hamblen
  • Re: Which One Should I Buy?, John Schutkeker
    • Re: Which One Should I Buy?, William Hamblen
      • Re: Which One Should I Buy?, Doink
• Andromedian Black Hole, Thomas Farrsby
  • Re: Andromedian Black Hole, Mark F.
    • Re: Andromedian Black Hole, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Andromedian Black Hole, William Hamblen
• Re: Telescope comming along..., Crusader
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Telescope comming along..., Tim Auton
    • Re: Telescope comming along..., Stephen Paul
• Medium Format "Piggyback" support/drive/tracker- suggestions?, rcyoung
  • Re: Medium Format "Piggyback" support/drive/tracker- suggestions?, laura halliday
    • Re: Medium Format "Piggyback" support/drive/tracker- suggestions?, rcyoung
• The Cosmological Principle, Sam Wormley
  • Message not available
    • Re: The Cosmological Principle, oriel36
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, Sam Wormley
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, DT
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, oriel36
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, oriel36
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, Sam Wormley
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, Sam Wormley
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, oriel36
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, Sam Wormley
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, oriel36
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, Thomas Farrsby
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, Ed T
      • Re: The Cosmological Principle, Thomas Farrsby
  • Message not available
    • Re: The Cosmological Principle, Yermiah
• Re: The PST, Rich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The PST, Joe Bergeron
  • Re: The PST, nytecam
  • Re: The PST, Thomas Farrsby
  • Re: The PST, Mij Adyaw
    • Re: The PST, Jan Owen
• Re: Mars Orbiter Spots Changes on Red Planet, Rich
• Sky and Tel and Meade's astro imagers (Yuck!), Rich
  • Re: Sky and Tel and Meade's astro imagers (Yuck!), Ed T
    • Re: Sky and Tel and Meade's astro imagers (Yuck!), Rich
  • Re: Sky and Tel and Meade's astro imagers (Yuck!), observer
    • Re: Sky and Tel and Meade's astro imagers (Yuck!), RMOLLISE
      • Re: Sky and Tel and Meade's astro imagers (Yuck!), Larry Stedman
• Imaging at Star Parties, Shawn
• Favorite Observing Chair, Don Fritz
  • Re: Favorite Observing Chair, RMOLLISE
  • Re: Favorite Observing Chair, Mark S. Holden
  • Message not available
    • Re: Favorite Observing Chair, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Favorite Observing Chair, Davoud
      • Re: Favorite Observing Chair, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Favorite Observing Chair, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Message not available
    • Re: Favorite Observing Chair, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Re: Favorite Observing Chair, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Favorite Observing Chair, Shawn
    • Re: Favorite Observing Chair, Shawn
  • Re: Favorite Observing Chair, Bill Carey
  • Re: Favorite Observing Chair, Marty
• Apogee 4" f/10 refractor, elaich
• 7 Astro Pizzas, Starlord
• Novices test digital astro-imaging, Regina Roper
• does the rotation of Earth give us magma?, granite stone
  • Re: does the rotation of Earth give us magma?, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: does the rotation of Earth give us magma?, DT
    • Re: does the rotation of Earth give us magma?, Dan Mckenna
  • Re: does the rotation of Earth give us magma?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: does the rotation of Earth give us magma?, Jan Owen
  • Re: does the rotation of Earth give us magma?, Sam Wormley
• Re: PSYCHOPATH DAVID DUKE NOW WRITING HIMSELF PRAISING EMAILS FROM JEWS, Jim Attfield
• Re: Light damping, Mark S. Holden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Light damping, Tim Auton
    • Re: Light damping, Dan McKenna
  • Re: Light damping, Bob May
• Re: Binoviewers and perceptions of true field of view, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Binoviewers and perceptions of true field of view, Davoud
• HUBBLE FINDS MYSTERIOUS DISK OF BLUE STARS AROUND BLACK HOLE (STScI-PR05-26), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
• 'forest' of solar proms, nytecam
  • Message not available
    • Re: 'forest' of solar proms, Michael McCulloch
  • Re: 'forest' of solar proms, Thomas Farrsby
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • 'forest' of solar proms, nytecam
    • Message not available
      • Re: 'forest' of solar proms, Dave Mitsky
• MEADE ETX-105 vs. LXD-75 SN-6AT, please advise., crazybear92604
  • Re: MEADE ETX-105 vs. LXD-75 SN-6AT, please advise., Terry A Haimann
    • Re: MEADE ETX-105 vs. LXD-75 SN-6AT, please advise., Stephen Paul
  • Re: MEADE ETX-105 vs. LXD-75 SN-6AT, please advise., md
  • Re: MEADE ETX-105 vs. LXD-75 SN-6AT, please advise., Pippen
  • Re: MEADE ETX-105 vs. LXD-75 SN-6AT, please advise., Mike Reed
  • Re: MEADE ETX-105 vs. LXD-75 SN-6AT, please advise., Craig M . Bobchin
• Collimating 4.5" primary mirror- what size center spot?, Al
  • Re: Collimating 4.5" primary mirror- what size center spot?, Ed Erbeck Jr.
  • Re: Collimating 4.5" primary mirror- what size center spot?, Yermiah
    • Re: Collimating 4.5" primary mirror- what size center spot?, Starlord
    • Re: Collimating 4.5" primary mirror- what size center spot?, Jan van Gastel
      • Re: Collimating 4.5" primary mirror- what size center spot?, Starlord
  • Re: Collimating 4.5" primary mirror- what size center spot?, elaich
  • Re: Collimating 4.5" primary mirror- what size center spot?, Havriliak
• Willam Optics Scope Question, Mike
  • Message not available
    • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, David
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, EdZ
      • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, Mike
      • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, Mike
      • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, Mike
  • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, spacerama
  • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, Pierre Vandevenne
    • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, Mike
      • Re: Willam Optics Scope Question, Pierre Vandevennne
• Equinox alignment, oriel36
  • Re: Equinox alignment, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Equinox alignment, John Carruthers
    • Re: Equinox alignment, katrinaxx
    • Message not available
      • Re: Equinox alignment, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Message not available
      • Re: Equinox alignment, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Equinox alignment, Howard Lester
      • Message not available
      • Re: Equinox alignment, Chris L Peterson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Equinox alignment, oriel36
      • Message not available
      • Re: Equinox alignment, Sam Wormley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Equinox alignment, William Hamblen
  • Message not available
    • Re: Equinox alignment, George
      • Re: Equinox alignment, oriel36
      • Re: Equinox alignment, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Equinox alignment, spoo bear
• Macintosh Astronomy Workshop and Astrofest, Davoud
• NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, Arnold
  • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, Michael McCulloch
    • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, Starlord
      • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, lal_truckee
      • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, Starlord
      • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, jt
      • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, Starlord
  • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, Davoud
    • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, spoo bear
    • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, Ashley Bland Crowley, III
      • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, Shawn
      • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, Joe Bergeron
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, John Savard
  • Re: NASA RELEASES PLANS FOR NEXT GENERATION SPACECRAFT, Hellaeon
• Re: Cause of haze/smoke in US Gulf?, Florian
  • Re: Cause of haze/smoke in US Gulf?, boofreak
• Mars now, decaf
  • Re: Mars now, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Mars now, decaf
      • Re: Mars now, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Mars now, decaf
      • Re: Mars now, solrobbins@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Mars now, laura halliday
    • Re: Mars now, Jake
  • Re: Mars now, rat ~( );>
• Balancing an SCT on a Fork/Wedge?, Davoud
  • Re: Balancing an SCT on a Fork/Wedge?, Colin J Denman
    • Re: Balancing an SCT on a Fork/Wedge?, Davoud
      • Re: Balancing an SCT on a Fork/Wedge?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Balancing an SCT on a Fork/Wedge?, Davoud
      • Re: Balancing an SCT on a Fork/Wedge?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Balancing an SCT on a Fork/Wedge?, Davoud
      • Re: Balancing an SCT on a Fork/Wedge?, Tim Auton
• Current moon phase #2, Dennis Allen
  • Re: Current moon phase #2, Florian
    • Re: Current moon phase #2, Florian
    • Re: Current moon phase #2, Dennis Allen
      • Re: Current moon phase #2, Florian
      • Re: Current moon phase #2, Dennis Allen
      • Re: Current moon phase #2, Florian
      • Re: Current moon phase #2, Dennis Allen
• Don't buy green bananas ;o), Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Don't buy green bananas ;o), spoo bear
    • Re: Don't buy green bananas ;o), Shawn
• Re: Moon observation, Brad Guth
  • Re: Moon observation, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Moon observation, observer
      • Re: Moon observation, Pippen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Moon observation, William Hamblen
    • Re: Moon observation, Pippen
      • Re: Moon observation, paul
  • Re: Moon observation, Brad Guth
    • Re: Moon observation, Pippen
      • Re: Moon observation, Brad Guth
      • Re: Moon observation, Pippen
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Moon observation, Brad Guth
      • Re: Moon observation, David Knisely
  • Re: Moon observation, Brad Guth
• Freeware Astronomy Software, Mike
  • Re: Freeware Astronomy Software, Philippe HAAKE
    • Re: Freeware Astronomy Software, Mike
  • Re: Freeware Astronomy Software, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Freeware Astronomy Software, Florian
    • Re: Freeware Astronomy Software, John Carruthers
  • Re: Freeware Astronomy Software, Martin R. Howell
    • Re: Freeware Astronomy Software, Robert L
    • Re: Freeware Astronomy Software, Robert L
  • Re: Freeware Astronomy Software, Mean Mr Mustard
• Moon - lightning conjunction :-), Glenn Holliday
• Greatest Brilliancy ==> Greatest Illuminated Extent, Paul Schlyter
  • Re: Greatest Brilliancy ==> Greatest Illuminated Extent, Brian Tung
• A question of asteroids, Mark F.
  • Re: A question of asteroids, Jax
    • Re: A question of asteroids, Bob
  • Re: A question of asteroids, tony_flanders
• Doing Deep-Sky Wonders, tony_flanders
  • Re: Doing Deep-Sky Wonders, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Doing Deep-Sky Wonders, Ed T
    • Re: Doing Deep-Sky Wonders, tony_flanders
      • Re: Doing Deep-Sky Wonders, Ed T
      • Re: Doing Deep-Sky Wonders, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Doing Deep-Sky Wonders, Ed T
      • Re: Doing Deep-Sky Wonders, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Doing Deep-Sky Wonders, Dave Mitsky
  • Re: Doing Deep-Sky Wonders, boo
• Pse help!, eugene
  • Re: Pse help!, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Pse help!, eugene
• Is this real?, Lil' Conner Peterson
  • Message not available
    • Re: Is this real?, Lil' Conner Peterson
  • Message not available
    • Re: Is this real?, kapella
  • Re: Is this real?, William Hamblen
    • Re: Is this real?, Marty
      • Re: Is this real?, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: Is this real?, katrinaxx
      • Re: Is this real?, Ed T
      • Re: Is this real?, Fred Garvin
  • Message not available
    • Re: Is this real?, John Savard
  • Re: Is this real?, Davoud
  • Re: Is this real?, Tim Killian
    • Re: Is this real?, Shawn
  • Re: Is this real?, Bill Davis Jr
  • Re: Is this real?, Mike Ruskai
    • Re: Is this real?, Daniele De Francesco
      • Re: Is this real?, Daniele De Francesco
  • Re: Is this real?, tedkord
  • Re: Is this real?, Fred Garvin
  • Re: Is this real?, William Hamblen
• BRJ variable star observa, JOHN PAZMINO
• Basic 2 Stamp, EricH
  • Re: Basic 2 Stamp, Tim Killian
• Cleaning up an ST80?, Glenn
  • Re: Cleaning up an ST80?, AstroHoney
  • Re: Cleaning up an ST80?, JATO
• B8, Starlord
• Can't seem to see D.S.Os, Jake
  • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, Jim
    • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, Jim
      • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, Jake
      • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, Jim
  • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, SkySea
  • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, tony_flanders
    • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, Jake
      • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, tony_flanders
      • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, tony_flanders
      • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, Hilton Evans
  • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, Robert L
  • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, Cousin Ricky
    • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, Dale Gombert
      • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, Brian Tung
      • Re: Can't seem to see D.S.Os, SkySea (Dale Gombert)
• Collimation options, Zarkovic
  • Re: Collimation options, William Foley
  • Re: Collimation options, Starlord
  • Re: Collimation options, Mark D
• Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, observer
    • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, TailHooker7
  • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Yermiah
      • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Shawn
  • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, boofreak
    • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, callisto
  • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, szaki
  • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, JATO
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Jeff R
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, William R. Mattil
      • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, moabrat
  • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Matthew Ota
    • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Coppy Littlehouse
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do You Guys Use Green Laser Pointers?, Doink
• Green laser pointers on telescopes, callisto
  • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, Paul Clark
  • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, boofreak
      • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, callisto
    • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, Shawn
      • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, SkySea
    • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, Davoud
  • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, rcyoung
    • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, callisto
      • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, Shawn
      • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, tony_flanders
      • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, JATO
  • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, JATO
  • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
    • Message not available
      • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, Dave Mitsky
      • Message not available
      • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, Dave Mitsky
  • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Green laser pointers on telescopes, Yermiah
• Mars and seeing, Robert L
  • Re: Mars and seeing, Marty
    • Re: Mars and seeing, Robert L
      • Re: Mars and seeing, Marty
      • Re: Mars and seeing, SkySea
      • Re: Mars and seeing, Robert L
      • Re: Mars and seeing, Odysseus
      • Re: Mars and seeing, SkySea
      • Re: Mars and seeing, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Mars and seeing, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Mars and seeing, Shawn
    • Re: Mars and seeing, Robert L
      • Re: Mars and seeing, Shawn
• the Sun today [Sat sept 17], nytecam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • the Sun today [Sat sept 17], nytecam
• Martian duststorm alert, nytecam
• Hayabusa (Muses-C) views Asteroid Itokawa, Matthew Ota
  • Re: Hayabusa (Muses-C) views Asteroid Itokawa, KM
• Moon over Long Beach, Mark F.
  • Re: Moon over Long Beach, Justin Uthadude
  • Re: Moon over Long Beach, Matthew Ota
  • Re: Moon over Long Beach, boofreak
    • Re: Moon over Long Beach, Mark F.
• Saturns Rings, Saturn
  • Re: Saturns Rings, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Saturns Rings, Matthew Ota
    • Re: Saturns Rings, Marty
  • Re: Saturns Rings, Shawn
• Re: haze and smoke, Howard Lester
  • Message not available
    • Re: haze and smoke, Howard Lester
      • Message not available
      • Re: haze and smoke, Howard Lester
• Invar low expansion metal, Ed Majden
  • Re: Invar low expansion metal, Tom Hise
    • Re: Invar low expansion metal, Havriliak
      • Re: Invar low expansion metal, Malcolm Stewart
      • Re: Invar low expansion metal, Ed Majden
      • Re: Invar low expansion metal, matt
      • Re: Invar low expansion metal, Larry Bourdillon
      • Re: Invar low expansion metal, Tim Killian
  • Re: Invar low expansion metal, MitchAlsup
  • Re: Invar low expansion metal, jtaylor
    • Re: Invar low expansion metal, Ed Majden
      • Re: Invar low expansion metal, howieglatter
      • Re: Invar low expansion metal, Ed Majden
• Re: Old Timers Only, Justin Uthadude
  • Re: Old Timers Only, Mark S. Holden
    • Re: Old Timers Only, Justin Uthadude
      • Re: Old Timers Only, Mark S. Holden
  • Message not available
    • Re: Old Timers Only, Justin Uthadude
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Old Timers Only, tony_flanders
    • Re: Old Timers Only, boofreak
  • Re: Old Timers Only, tony_flanders
• Wright Newton, Havriliak
  • Re: Wright Newton, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Wright Newton, Richard F.L.R.Snashall
    • Re: Wright Newton, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Wright Newton, bratislav3162
      • Re: Wright Newton, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Wright Newton, Alen K
      • Re: Wright Newton, Alen K
  • Re: Wright Newton, M Schell
• Re: Anyone using a Sky Watcher 102mm Mat-Cas ?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Anyone using a Sky Watcher 102mm Mat-Cas ?, Bob
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Anyone using a Sky Watcher 102mm Mat-Cas ?, Mark S. Holden
    • Re: Anyone using a Sky Watcher 102mm Mat-Cas ?, Bob
• 1000 Oaks H alpha, T.Rains
• What if someone steals light in space?, Ted Ratmark
  • Re: What if someone steals light in space?, szaki
    • Re: What if someone steals light in space?, Havriliak
  • Re: What if someone steals light in space?, Hilton Evans
    • Re: What if someone steals light in space?, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What if someone steals light in space?, szaki
  • Re: What if someone steals light in space?, T.Rains
    • Message not available
      • Re: What if someone steals light in space?, T.Rains
  • Re: What if someone steals light in space?, lal_truckee
• 4 occultations in 2 weeks?!, Tom Luton
• Tele Vue free book offer!, Ron B[ee]
  • Re: Tele Vue free book offer!, Mij Adyaw
    • Re: Tele Vue free book offer!, Ron B[ee]
  • Re: Tele Vue free book offer!, daveponder
• Re: Tonight, the 15th of September should be active with aurora, decaf
  • Re: Tonight, the 15th of September should be active with aurora, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: Tonight, the 15th of September should be active with aurora, Jan Owen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Tonight, the 15th of September should be active with aurora, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Tonight, the 15th of September should be active with aurora, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx
• back to the moon ...., Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: back to the moon ...., Matthew Ota
  • Re: back to the moon ...., Matthew Ota
    • Re: back to the moon ...., Tim Killian
      • Re: back to the moon ...., matt
      • Re: back to the moon ...., Alson Wong
  • Re: back to the moon ...., Brad Guth
  • Re: back to the moon ...., Jeff
  • Re: back to the moon ...., Rich
  • Re: back to the moon ...., Sam Wormley
  • Re: back to the moon ...., Hilton Evans
    • Re: back to the moon ...., Starlord
      • Re: back to the moon ...., Sam Wormley
      • Re: back to the moon ...., Starlord
      • Re: back to the moon ...., Paul Schlyter
      • Re: back to the moon ...., Starlord
      • Re: back to the moon ...., Hilton Evans
      • Re: back to the moon ...., Joe Bergeron
      • Re: back to the moon ...., Hilton Evans
      • Re: back to the moon ...., Starlord
      • Re: back to the moon ...., Hilton Evans
      • Re: back to the moon ...., Hilton Evans
      • Re: back to the moon ...., Rich
  • Re: back to the moon ...., Brad Guth
  • Re: back to the moon ...., Brad Guth
  • Re: back to the moon ...., Brad Guth
• Re: What can I really see with a 60mm, laura halliday
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What can I really see with a 60mm, Cousin Ricky
  • Re: What can I really see with a 60mm, boo
  • Re: What can I really see with a 60mm, Will Parr
  • Re: What can I really see with a 60mm, Mike Ruskai
• Good Deal??, T.Rains
• Re: Itokawa success, Greg Crinklaw
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Itokawa success, T.Rains
  • Re: Itokawa success, Chris L Peterson
• Problems with Meade LX-200, Johan van der Walt
• Boomerang, T.Rains
  • Re: Boomerang, Sam Wormley
    • Message not available
      • Re: Boomerang, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Re: Boomerang, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Boomerang, Brian Tung
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Boomerang, Mike Kreuzer
      • Re: Boomerang, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Boomerang, Mike Kreuzer
      • Re: Boomerang, T.Rains
      • Message not available
      • Re: Boomerang, T.Rains
      • Re: Boomerang, Chris L Peterson
  • OT: Boomerang, Zarkovic
• Skinny dip astronomy?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Skinny dip astronomy?, Herb York
    • Re: Skinny dip astronomy?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Skinny dip astronomy? cutting edge astronomy, Dan Mckenna
  • Re: Skinny dip astronomy?, Mark D
• doublets, T.Rains
  • Re: doublets, Roger Hamlett
    • Re: doublets, juper malchin
      • Re: doublets, Roger Hamlett
  • Re: doublets, boofreak
  • Re: doublets, David
• Aurora Photos on Sept. 11-12 2005, Stu
  • Re: Aurora Photos on Sept. 11-12 2005, boo
  • Re: Aurora Photos on Sept. 11-12 2005, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Aurora Photos on Sept. 11-12 2005, George
  • Re: Aurora Photos on Sept. 11-12 2005, eddiestardust
  • Re: Aurora Photos on Sept. 11-12 2005, Stu
• BLACK HOLE IN SEARCH OF A HOME (STScI-PR05-13), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
• Re: Liberal New Orleanians' "Blue" Bad-Karma!, Starlord
• Current moon phase?, Dennis Allen
  • Re: Current moon phase?, Brian Tung
    • Re: Current moon phase?, Dennis Allen
  • Re: Current moon phase?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Current moon phase?, Dennis Allen
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Ernie Wright
      • Message not available
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Ernie Wright
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Ernie Wright
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Dennis Allen
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Ernie Wright
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Dennis Allen
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Dennis Allen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Dennis Allen
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Dr John Stockton
  • Re: Current moon phase?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Current moon phase?, Dennis Allen
  • Re: Current moon phase?, Florian
  • Message not available
    • Re: Current moon phase?, Dennis Allen
      • Re: Current moon phase? It's wrong, Ernie Wright
      • Re: Current moon phase? It's wrong, Dennis Allen
      • Re: Current moon phase? It's wrong, Ernie Wright
      • Re: Current moon phase? It's wrong, Brian Tung
      • Re: Current moon phase? It's wrong, Ernie Wright
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Stephen Paul
      • Message not available
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Dennis Allen
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Ernie Wright
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Dennis Allen
      • Re: Current moon phase?, William C. Keel
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Dennis Allen
      • Re: Current moon phase?, Paul Schlyter
• Sky watchers at all latitudes should be alert for auroras, Sam Wormley
• NOAA 808 sunspot, Daniele Gasparri
• Re: Clear Night Quota Exceeded?, Hilton Evans
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Clear Night Quota Exceeded?, Mark S. Holden
    • Re: Clear Night Quota Exceeded?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Clear Night Quota Exceeded?, laura halliday
      • Re: Clear Night Quota Exceeded?, Dan McKenna
      • Re: Clear Night Quota Exceeded?, Shawn
• Re: Clear Night Quota Exceeded?, boo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Clear Night Quota Exceeded?, allisonki
• Re: Solid surface or curst on sun????, Michael McCulloch
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Solid surface or curst on sun????, fcathell
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Solid surface or curst on sun????, Michael McCulloch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Solid surface or curst on sun????, T.Rains
    • Message not available
      • Re: Solid surface or curst on sun????, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Solid surface or curst on sun????, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Solid surface or curst on sun????, fcathell
  • Re: Solid surface or curst on sun????, Eric
  • Re: Solid surface or curst on sun????, juper malchin
• TESTRD, TESTBOY
• finding a galaxy, Eric
  • Message not available
    • Re: finding a galaxy, Shawn
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Bernhard Rems
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Shawn
  • Message not available
    • Re: finding a galaxy, Eric
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Mark S. Holden
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Eric
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Eric
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Sam Wormley
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Jim
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Eric
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Eric
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Eric
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Eric
      • Message not available
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Message not available
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Eric
  • Message not available
    • Re: finding a galaxy, Eric
      • Message not available
      • Re: finding a galaxy, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: finding a galaxy, tony_flanders
    • Re: finding a galaxy, Pippen
      • Re: finding a galaxy, lal_truckee
  • Message not available
    • Re: finding a galaxy, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: finding a galaxy, David Nakamoto
• Telescope recommendations?, devlyn76
  • Re: Telescope recommendations?, G
  • Re: Telescope recommendations?, Bernhard Rems
  • Re: Telescope recommendations?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Telescope recommendations?, Mark de Regt
  • Message not available
    • Re: Telescope recommendations?, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Message not available
    • Re: Telescope recommendations?, Mean Mr Mustard
      • Re: Telescope recommendations?, Mark S. Holden
      • Re: Telescope recommendations?, devlyn76
      • Re: Telescope recommendations?, Esmail Bonakdarian
• Celestron XLT Coatings on Celestron CATS, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Celestron XLT Coatings on Celestron CATS, Michael McCulloch
  • Re: Celestron XLT Coatings on Celestron CATS, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Celestron XLT Coatings on Celestron CATS, RMOLLISE
• Cherokee #8 Pronto and The Moon, Cherokee
  • Re: Cherokee #8 Pronto and The Moon, tony_flanders
• HUBBLE CAPTURES SCATTERED LIGHT FROM THE BOOMERANG NEBULA (STScI-PRC05-25-Heritage), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
• 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Stephen Paul
  • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Michael McCulloch
    • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, T.Rains
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Stephen Paul
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, szaki
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, szaki
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Stephen Paul
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Brian Tung
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Michael McCulloch
    • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Stephen Paul
    • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, szaki
    • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, szaki
  • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, David Nakamoto
  • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Stephen Paul
    • Message not available
      • Re: 9.25 lives up to its Rep, Stephen Paul
• naked eye sunspot #798, nytecam
• Recomd a ?, G
• Sir Hermann Bondi has died., William Hamblen
  • Re: Sir Hermann Bondi has died., lal_truckee
    • Re: Sir Hermann Bondi has died., Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Sir Hermann Bondi has died., Hilton Evans
    • Re: Sir Hermann Bondi has died., geraldkelleher
  • Re: Sir Hermann Bondi has died., Tom Kirke
• Commercial hyperboloid secondary mirrors?, Mike Kreuzer
• A Giant Surprise about Extrasolar Planets, Magnificent Universe
  • Re: A Giant Surprise about Extrasolar Planets, John Savard
  • Re: A Giant Surprise about Extrasolar Planets, Sam Wormley
• NOSS triple sats, nytecam
  • Re: NOSS triple sats, Howard Lester
    • Re: NOSS triple sats, Dan McKenna
      • Re: NOSS triple sats, Howard Lester
  • Re: NOSS triple sats, Norbert
• Aurora and southward Bz?, canopus56
  • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, Brian Tung
    • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, canopus56
      • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, canopus56
      • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, beavith
      • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, William Hamblen
      • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, Dan Mckenna
  • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Message not available
      • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, canopus56
      • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, canopus56
      • Message not available
      • Re: Aurora and southward Bz?, canopus56
• EXTENDED WARNING: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Sam Wormley
  • Re: EXTENDED WARNING: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Mike Thomas
• spot 798 region, Mike Thomas
• Re: What has been learned from "Deep Impact.", Dave Mitsky
• long focus achro and apos, Dan
  • Re: long focus achro and apos, rat ~( );>
    • Re: long focus achro and apos, Dan
  • Re: long focus achro and apos, MitchAlsup
• Any early eastcoast US reports of aurora appreciated, canopus56
  • Re: Any early eastcoast US reports of aurora appreciated, sabiajohn@xxxxxxx
• NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Matthew Ota
  • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Bernhard Rems
    • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Richard Turner
    • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Matthew Ota
    • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Matthew Ota
  • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Mike Thomas
    • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Mike Thomas
      • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Mike Thomas
    • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, afiggatt
    • Re: NASA releases Hubble image of Asteriod 1Ceres, Thomas Womack
• Need to replace the focuser of my 6-inch synta refractor, tkuniok
  • Re: Need to replace the focuser of my 6-inch synta refractor, Mark D
  • Re: Need to replace the focuser of my 6-inch synta refractor, Mark D
    • Synta refractor focuser adjustment screws [Was: Re: Need to replace the focuser of my 6-inch synta refractor], tkuniok
      • Re: Synta refractor focuser adjustment screws [Was: Re: Need to rep..., Mark D
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Need to replace the focuser of my 6-inch synta refractor, tkuniok
    • Re: Need to replace the focuser of my 6-inch synta refractor, lal_truckee
      • Re: Need to replace the focuser of my 6-inch synta refractor, Jax
      • Re: Need to replace the focuser of my 6-inch synta refractor, tkuniok
      • Re: Need to replace the focuser of my 6-inch synta refractor, Jax
• Opinions about Discovery Telescopes, solstici
  • Re: Opinions about Discovery Telescopes, Starlord
  • Re: Opinions about Discovery Telescopes, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Opinions about Discovery Telescopes, Larry Stedman
• Re: MOON LANDING HOAX: CHURCH = TECHNOLOGY & GOVERNMENT - Shuttle Carried on Aircraft model, Jerry Irvine
  • Re: MOON LANDING HOAX: CHURCH = TECHNOLOGY & GOVERNMENT - Shuttle Carried on Aircraft model, Starlord
• LX10 alignment, Me
  • Re: LX10 alignment, RMOLLISE
    • Re: LX10 alignment, szaki
  • Re: LX10 alignment, Hilton Evans
  • Re: LX10 alignment, Me
• SEVERE GEOMAGNETIC STORM OBSERVED, Sam Wormley
  • Re: SEVERE GEOMAGNETIC STORM OBSERVED, Mike Thomas
    • Re: SEVERE GEOMAGNETIC STORM OBSERVED, Ghost in the machine
      • Re: SEVERE GEOMAGNETIC STORM OBSERVED, Mike Thomas
• Rosamond Report 2.0, Starlord
  • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Mark F.
    • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Starlord
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Starlord
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Who Ya
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Chris.B
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, lal_truckee
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Starlord
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Mark D
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Kevin M. Vernon
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, astronomer
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, T.T.
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Starlord
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Brian Tung
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Marty
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, ewitte
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, T.T.
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, T.T.
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, Mark D
      • Re: Rosamond Report 2.0, ngc457
• Black River Astronomy Society 2005 Ohio Turnpike Astronomy Association Convention Observing Report, John Nichols
  • Re: Black River Astronomy Society 2005 Ohio Turnpike Astronomy Association Convention Observing Report, John Nichols
    • Re: Black River Astronomy Society 2005 Ohio Turnpike Astronomy Association Convention Observing Report, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Black River Astronomy Society 2005 Ohio Turnpike Astronomy Association Convention Observing Report, John Nichols
• The Astronomers - Website for amateur astronomers, Bernhard Rems
  • Re: The Astronomers - Website for amateur astronomers, Matthew Ota
    • Re: The Astronomers - Website for amateur astronomers, Bernhard Rems
    • Re: The Astronomers - Website for amateur astronomers, RMOLLISE
      • Re: The Astronomers - Website for amateur astronomers, Matthew Ota
      • Re: The Astronomers - Website for amateur astronomers, michaelmorris4@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: The Astronomers - Website for amateur astronomers, Greg Crinklaw
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Astronomers - Website for amateur astronomers, Bernhard Rems
      • Re: The Astronomers - Website for amateur astronomers, PJ
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Astronomers - Website for amateur astronomers, John Nichols
• test, Bernhard Rems
  • Re: test, Richard F.L.R.Snashall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Test, Eni Koljaka
• shadow of central obstruction - eyepiece vs. SLR camera, Topstuck
  • Re: shadow of central obstruction - eyepiece vs. SLR camera, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: shadow of central obstruction - eyepiece vs. SLR camera, Topstuck
• Solar activity remains very high and shows no signs of abating, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Solar activity remains very high and shows no signs of abating, Mike Thomas
    • Re: Solar activity remains very high and shows no signs of abating, Dtolman
• AURORA ALERT: If you live in northern places, Sam Wormley
  • Re: AURORA ALERT: If you live in northern places, Fireman
    • Re: AURORA ALERT: If you live in northern places, Mark S. Holden
    • Re: AURORA ALERT: If you live in northern places, banjaxed
  • Re: AURORA ALERT: If you live in northern places, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: AURORA ALERT: If you live in northern places, Mike Thomas
    • Re: AURORA ALERT: If you live in northern places, banjaxed
      • Re: AURORA ALERT: If you live in northern places, Mike Thomas
  • Re: AURORA ALERT: If you live in northern places, sabiajohn@xxxxxxx
• WARNING: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Sam Wormley
  • Re: WARNING: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • WARNING: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Sam Wormley
• Astronomy in Scottsdale Az, Craig M . Bobchin
  • Re: Astronomy in Scottsdale Az, Jan Owen
• Spot 798, Mike Thomas
  • Re: Spot 798, Matthew Ota
  • Re: Spot 798, Alexander Avtanski
• Region 798, Mike Thomas
• Clear Sky Clock Widget, Shawn
  • Re: Clear Sky Clock Widget, Florian
    • Re: Clear Sky Clock Widget, Florian
      • Re: Clear Sky Clock Widget, Larry Stedman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Clear Sky Clock Widget, skyrover
    • Re: Clear Sky Clock Widget, Florian
    • Re: Clear Sky Clock Widget, Davoud
• Photos of Spectra, Ioannis
  • Re: Photos of Spectra, Ioannis
    • Re: Photos of Spectra, nytecam
• Magnitude Quote, Gareth Slee
  • Re: Magnitude Quote, Mike Thomas
    • Re: Magnitude Quote, Howard Lester
      • Re: Magnitude Quote, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Magnitude Quote, Mike Thomas
      • Re: Magnitude Quote, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: Magnitude Quote, Howard Lester
  • Re: Magnitude Quote, Stuart Levy
• Insights from atomic physics lead to new routes for spacecraft, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Insights from atomic physics lead to new routes for spacecraft, Mike Thomas
  • Re: Insights from atomic physics lead to new routes for spacecraft, Mike Thomas
    • Re: Insights from atomic physics lead to new routes for spacecraft, Fireman
      • Re: Insights from atomic physics lead to new routes for spacecraft, Mike Thomas
• M31, M33 Discussion sought...., Doink
  • Re: M31, M33 Discussion sought...., boo
    • Re: M31, M33 Discussion sought...., tony_flanders
  • Re: M31, M33 Discussion sought...., boo
  • Re: M31, M33 Discussion sought...., Brian Tung
    • Re: M31, M33 Discussion sought...., Stephen Paul
      • Re: M31, M33 Discussion sought...., Paul Schlyter
  • Thank you....GREAT tips, Doink
  • Re: M31, M33 Discussion sought...., John Savard
    • Re: M31, M33 Discussion sought...., Paul Schlyter
  • Re: M31, M33 Discussion sought...., Stephen Paul
  • Re: M31, M33 Discussion sought...., StarLost
  • Re: M31, M33 Discussion sought...., Stuart Levy
• invasion of Televue eps, Zarkovic
  • Re: invasion of Televue eps, John Carruthers
  • Re: invasion of Televue eps, Fireman
    • Re: invasion of Televue eps, Mark S. Holden
      • Re: invasion of Televue eps, Herb York
      • Re: invasion of Televue eps, Mark S. Holden
• Meade ETX-70 with SLR - coverage of solar disc?, Neil K.
  • Re: Meade ETX-70 with SLR - coverage of solar disc?, William Hamblen
  • Re: Meade ETX-70 with SLR - coverage of solar disc?, Mark S. Holden
  • Re: Meade ETX-70 with SLR - coverage of solar disc?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
• Meade RCX400-Astrometry, rejean
  • Re: Meade RCX400-Astrometry, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Meade RCX400-Astrometry, Matthew D. Mills
• Bailly of Bailly's beads, Hilton Evans
  • Re: Bailly of Bailly's beads, Mark Gingrich
    • Re: Bailly of Bailly's beads, Howard Lester
      • Re: Bailly of Bailly's beads, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Bailly of Bailly's beads, Dan McKenna
      • Re: Bailly of Bailly's beads, Jan Owen
    • Re: Bailly of Bailly's beads, Hilton Evans
      • Re: Bailly of Bailly's beads, John Nichols
• Rosamond Report: The Operation Room, Starlord
• Sun Shadow Investigation Project, Bob Riddle
  • Re: Sun Shadow Investigation Project, geraldkelleher
• Cherokee #7: Pronto & Ophiuchus, Cherokee
  • Re: Cherokee #7: Pronto & Ophiuchus, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Cherokee #7: Pronto & Ophiuchus, tony_flanders
      • Re: Cherokee #7: Pronto & Ophiuchus, Cherokee
      • Re: Cherokee #7: Pronto & Ophiuchus, tony_flanders
      • Re: Cherokee #7: Pronto & Ophiuchus, tony_flanders
      • Re: Cherokee #7: Pronto & Ophiuchus, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Cherokee #7: Pronto & Ophiuchus, tony_flanders
    • Re: Cherokee #7: Pronto & Ophiuchus, Brian Tung
• SPACE WEATHER ADVISORY BULLETIN #05- 9, Sam Wormley
• Here we go: WARNING: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Sam Wormley
• Conjunction of Venus, Moon, Jupiter & Spica from Australia, Match
• giant sunspot + flare, nytecam
• Pennie for your thoughts?, G
  • Re: Pennie for your thoughts?, Roger Hamlett
    • Re: Pennie for your thoughts?, RMOLLISE
  • Re: Pennie for your thoughts?, RMOLLISE
  • Re: Pennie for your thoughts?, Mick
  • Re: Pennie for your thoughts?, G
  • Re: Pennie for your thoughts?, G
• Re: SN1987A film ?, William C. Keel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SN1987A film ?, G
    • Re: SN1987A film ?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: SN1987A film ?, G
    • Re: SN1987A film ?, Brian Tung
  • Re: SN1987A film ?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: SN1987A film ?, Preston S Justis
• BRJ variable star observations, allisonki
  • Re: BRJ variable star observations, Nicola Montecchiari
    • Re: BRJ variable star observations, allisonki
      • Re: BRJ variable star observations, Nicola Montecchiari
  • Re: BRJ variable star observations, Tristram Brelstaff
    • Re: BRJ variable star observations, allisonki
      • Re: BRJ variable star observations, Tristram Brelstaff
    • Re: BRJ variable star observations, Thomas Womack
      • Re: BRJ variable star observations, Tristram Brelstaff
      • NQ Herculis (was Re: BRJ variable star observations), Tristram Brelstaff
  • Re: BRJ variable star observations, CNJ999
• War of the Worlds, Mick
  • Re: War of the Worlds, Mob_rule
    • Re: War of the Worlds, Mick
  • Re: War of the Worlds, Hawkeye
• A GLOBAL DIGITAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, szaki
  • Re: A GLOBAL DIGITAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, starburst
    • Re: A GLOBAL DIGITAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, szaki
    • Re: A GLOBAL DIGITAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, Greg Crinklaw
  • Re: A GLOBAL DIGITAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, Sam Wormley
    • Re: A GLOBAL DIGITAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, Sam Wormley
  • Re: A GLOBAL DIGITAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, Jim Attfield
    • Re: A GLOBAL DIGITAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, szaki
  • Re: A GLOBAL DIGITAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, blart
• Last night on Mt. Pilchuck, Martin
  • Re: Last night on Mt. Pilchuck, tony_flanders
• Can the Meade DSI autoguide a LX200 Classic?, Jeff Polston
• Moon, Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, G.T.
  • Re: Moon, Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Moon, Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Moon, Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, G.T.
• Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, Mick
    • Re: Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, Mike Thomas
      • Re: Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, lal_truckee
      • Re: Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, Ed T
      • Re: Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, lal_truckee
      • Re: Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, Mick
      • Re: Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, Brian Tung
      • Re: Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, Mick
    • Re: Thursday Night -- Friday Morning -- Potential Aurora -- Friday Evening, Hawkeye
• space trash, Mick
  • Re: space trash, Starlord
  • Re: space trash, Phil Wheeler
• LPR/nebula filters with ETX 90, michaelmorris4@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: LPR/nebula filters with ETX 90, Doink
  • Message not available
    • Re: LPR/nebula filters with ETX 90, Stephen Paul
      • Re: LPR/nebula filters with ETX 90, gubbenimanen
• Digital Cameras for Astro and Spectro work, Ioannis
  • Re: Digital Cameras for Astro and Spectro work, George
    • Re: Digital Cameras for Astro and Spectro work, nytecam
      • Re: Digital Cameras for Astro and Spectro work, George
      • Re: Digital Cameras for Astro and Spectro work, matt
      • Re: Digital Cameras for Astro and Spectro work, George
• triple pic at dusk - ISS pass over my dome!, nytecam
• Portable telescope for eclipse photography?, Neil K.
  • Re: Portable telescope for eclipse photography?, AFM
  • Re: Portable telescope for eclipse photography?, Alson Wong
    • Re: Portable telescope for eclipse photography?, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Portable telescope for eclipse photography?, szaki
  • Re: Portable telescope for eclipse photography?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
• LARGEST ASTEROID MAY BE 'MINI PLANET' WITH WATER ICE (STScI-PR05-27), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
  • Re: LARGEST ASTEROID MAY BE 'MINI PLANET' WITH WATER ICE (STScI-PR05-27), Richard F.L.R.Snashall
  • Re: LARGEST ASTEROID MAY BE 'MINI PLANET' WITH WATER ICE (STScI-PR05-27), John Savard
    • Re: LARGEST ASTEROID MAY BE 'MINI PLANET' WITH WATER ICE (STScI-PR05-27), ph42
      • Re: LARGEST ASTEROID MAY BE 'MINI PLANET' WITH WATER ICE (STScI-PR05-27), Richard F.L.R.Snashall
      • Re: LARGEST ASTEROID MAY BE 'MINI PLANET' WITH WATER ICE (STScI-PR05-27), Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Re: LARGEST ASTEROID MAY BE 'MINI PLANET' WITH WATER ICE (STScI-PR05-27), Brian Tung
      • Re: LARGEST ASTEROID MAY BE 'MINI PLANET' WITH WATER ICE (STScI-PR05-27), John Savard
      • Message not available
      • Re: LARGEST ASTEROID MAY BE 'MINI PLANET' WITH WATER ICE (STScI-PR05-27), Brian Tung
      • Re: LARGEST ASTEROID MAY BE 'MINI PLANET' WITH WATER ICE (STScI-PR05-27), Alson Wong
      • Message not available
      • Re: LARGEST ASTEROID MAY BE 'MINI PLANET' WITH WATER ICE (STScI-PR05-27), Brian Tung
      • Re: LARGEST ASTEROID MAY BE 'MINI PLANET' WITH WATER ICE (STScI-PR05-27), ph42
• German Equatorial Mount, Keith Woodard
  • Re: German Equatorial Mount, Howard Lester
    • Re: German Equatorial Mount, Tim Killian
  • Re: German Equatorial Mount, Tony & Barb Vellturo
    • Re: German Equatorial Mount, dbohnsack
    • Re: German Equatorial Mount, Keith Woodard
      • Re: German Equatorial Mount, laura halliday
  • Re: German Equatorial Mount, Terry A Haimann
    • Re: German Equatorial Mount, Gil
• Re: The shadows are back..., RMOLLISE
  • Re: The shadows are back..., Mob_rule
    • Re: The shadows are back..., Starlord
  • Re: The shadows are back..., Shawn
  • Re: The shadows are back..., Starlord
    • Re: The shadows are back..., RMOLLISE
• Saturn's up, grumpa
• superb solar pillar prom, nytecam
• poles and asteroids, blart
  • Re: poles and asteroids, Tom Rankin
    • Re: poles and asteroids, blart
  • Re: poles and asteroids, Chris L Peterson
• Mad Max Machine Photo, Starlord
• Night away from WORK 9-5, Doink
  • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Doink
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Doink
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Doink
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Doink
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Martin
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Doink
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Mean Mr Mustard
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Doink
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Brian Tung
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Doink
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, AstroHoney
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Brian Tung
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Doink
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, AstroHoney
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Doink
      • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Martin
    • Re: Night away from WORK 9-5, Doink
• What did I do right?, Justin Uthadude
  • Re: What did I do right?, Pippen
  • Re: What did I do right?, Mark D
  • Re: What did I do right?, Doink
  • Re: What did I do right?, Starlord
  • Re: What did I do right?, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: What did I do right?, Stephen Paul
• ETX-70AT optical design, spamtrap475rsd
  • Re: ETX-70AT optical design, RMOLLISE
    • NEW ETX-80 ? Was (Re: ETX-70AT optical design), matt
      • Re: NEW ETX-80 ? Was (Re: ETX-70AT optical design), Roger Hamlett
      • Re: NEW ETX-80 ? Was (Re: ETX-70AT optical design), jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
    • Re: ETX-70AT optical design, spamtrap475rsd
      • Re: ETX-70AT optical design, Richard F.L.R.Snashall
      • Re: ETX-70AT optical design, spamtrap475rsd
      • Re: ETX-70AT optical design, Richard F.L.R.Snashall
• Astronomy Magazine August 2005, michaelmorris4@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Astronomy Magazine August 2005, Larry Stedman
• Astronomy curriculum assistance, Gusset
  • Re: Astronomy curriculum assistance, mbennett
  • Re: Astronomy curriculum assistance, Martin Brown
    • Re: Astronomy curriculum assistance, Wayne Howell
      • Re: Astronomy curriculum assistance, Doink
  • Re: Astronomy curriculum assistance, blart
• tenuous solar prom, nytecam
• Colorado PST Opinions Needed, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Colorado PST Opinions Needed, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: Colorado PST Opinions Needed, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Colorado PST Opinions Needed, Mean Mr Mustard
      • Re: Colorado PST Opinions Needed, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Colorado PST Opinions Needed, Tim ffrench-Lynch
  • Re: Colorado PST Opinions Needed, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Colorado PST Opinions Needed, Coppy Littlehouse
    • Re: Colorado PST Opinions Needed, Coppy Littlehouse
• Phases of Mars?, RS
  • Re: Phases of Mars?, Paul Schlyter
  • Re: Phases of Mars?, SkySea@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Phases of Mars?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Phases of Mars?, Greg Crinklaw
    • Re: Phases of Mars?, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Phases of Mars?, Florian
  • Re: Phases of Mars?, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Phases of Mars?, Paul Schlyter
  • Re: Phases of Mars?, William Hamblen
  • Re: Phases of Mars?, Florian
• Backyard Image of M31, RS
  • Re: Backyard Image of M31, SkySea@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Backyard Image of M31, John Deer
    • Re: Backyard Image of M31, RS
  • Re: Backyard Image of M31, JATO
    • Re: Backyard Image of M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Backyard Image of M31, JATO
    • Re: Backyard Image of M31, Shawn
      • Re: Backyard Image of M31, JATO
    • Re: Backyard Image of M31, RS
      • Re: Backyard Image of M31, JATO
  • Re: Backyard Image of M31, RS
    • Re: Backyard Image of M31, JATO
• Cherokee #6: Pronto & Aquila/Serpens, Cherokee
  • Re: Cherokee #6: Pronto & Aquila/Serpens, Odysseus
  • Re: Cherokee #6: Pronto & Aquila/Serpens, tony_flanders
    • Re: Cherokee #6: Pronto & Aquila/Serpens, Cherokee
      • Re: Cherokee #6: Pronto & Aquila/Serpens, tony_flanders
• Re: Strange trio of satellites, Jeff Polston
• Meade LX200 12" SCT For Sale, Phil Trevorrow
• Re: Aurora pictures and video, Emma Herranen
  • Re: Aurora pictures and video, Stu
• Longitude by Lunar Distances, FrankReedCT
  • Re: Longitude by Lunar Distances, Dan Wenz
• Re: LA Times stories on astronomy, Morris Jones
• [OT-Definitely] Inserting Page No.s int an Adobe Reader 6.0 Doc, W. Watson
• UV transmitting lens, Ed Majden
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: UV transmitting lens, Ed Majden
  • Re: UV transmitting lens, Kool Aid
• NUDE BRITNEY SPEARS, malfayhellow
  • Re: NUDE BRITNEY SPEARS, Davoud
    • Re: NUDE BRITNEY SPEARS, Marty
  • Re: NUDE BRITNEY SPEARS, Mick
  • Re: NUDE BRITNEY SPEARS, William Foley
  • Re: NUDE BRITNEY SPEARS, voderlosmikera
• Rosamond Report, Starlord
  • Re: Rosamond Report, Stuart Chapman
• Colorful and blinking Capella?, Grog
  • Re: Colorful and blinking Capella?, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Colorful and blinking Capella?, nytecam
  • Re: Colorful and blinking Capella?, George
    • Re: Colorful and blinking Capella?, sabiajohn@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Colorful and blinking Capella?, Mick
• astronomers in the gulf coast?, Larry Brown
  • Re: astronomers in the gulf coast?, RMOLLISE
• Tenth Planet...any news?, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Tenth Planet...any news?, Klaatu
    • Re: Tenth Planet...any news?, Odysseus
    • Re: Tenth Planet...any news?, Mike Ruskai
      • Re: Tenth Planet...any news?, Wayne Howell
      • Re: Tenth Planet...any news?, Jim
      • Re: Tenth Planet...any news?, Klaatu
  • Re: Tenth Planet...any news?, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: Tenth Planet...any news?, David G. Nagel
  • Re: Tenth Planet...any news?, richard schumacher
    • Re: Tenth Planet...any news?, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Be the first to own an XBox360 (for FREE!!!), RMOLLISE
• active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., justbeats
    • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., RMOLLISE
    • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Tim Auton
      • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Jeff Polston
      • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
    • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., tony_flanders
    • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Len Philpot
      • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Jeff Polston
  • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Martin Brown
    • Re: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Report: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: Report: active dew prevention for finders? .. OTA is fine .., Esmail Bonakdarian
• Orion DualBeam Astro Flashlight Battery Replacement, John Nichols
  • Re: Orion DualBeam Astro Flashlight Battery Replacement, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: Orion DualBeam Astro Flashlight Battery Replacement, John Nichols
      • Re: Orion DualBeam Astro Flashlight Battery Replacement, Esmail Bonakdarian
• how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, md
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Martin Brown
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, kapella
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, justbeats
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Shawn
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, boo
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Martin
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, rat ~( );>
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, David Nakamoto
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, David Nakamoto
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Ioannis
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Message not available
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Jan Owen
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Marty
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Marty
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Marty
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, tony_flanders
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Paul Schlyter
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, tony_flanders
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, David Nakamoto
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Terry Bohlsen
    • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Terry B
      • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: how much aperture needed for M31, Kool Aid
• Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, David Nakamoto
  • Message not available
    • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, David Nakamoto
      • Message not available
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Rob Johnson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Beta Persei
      • Message not available
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Jeff R
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Beta Persei
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Beta Persei
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Beta Persei
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Beta Persei
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Cousin Ricky
      • Message not available
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Cousin Ricky
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Tim Auton
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Su090405 - Venus, Jupiter, and Spica, Odysseus
• S&amp;T review-Meade low-cost cameras, nytecam
  • Re: S&amp;T review-Meade low-cost cameras, Hilton Evans
    • Re: S&amp;T review-Meade low-cost cameras, md
      • Re: S&amp;T review-Meade low-cost cameras, David Nakamoto
      • Re: S&amp;T review-Meade low-cost cameras, Geraldo on Family Pet
      • Re: S&amp;T review-Meade low-cost cameras, RMOLLISE
      • Re: S&amp;T review-Meade low-cost cameras, Robin Leadbeater
      • Re: S&amp;T review-Meade low-cost cameras, lal_truckee
      • Re: S&amp;T review-Meade low-cost cameras, JATO
      • Re: S&amp;T review-Meade low-cost cameras, lal_truckee
    • Re: S&amp;T review-Meade low-cost cameras, Geraldo on Family Pet
• Other suggestions, Terry B
  • Re: Other suggestions, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Other suggestions, William Foley
  • Re: Other suggestions, D&D
    • Re: Other suggestions, Coppy Littlehouse
      • Re: Other suggestions, Coppy Littlehouse
  • Re: Other suggestions, SkySea@xxxxxxx
• Is this rare?, Jethro
  • Re: Is this rare?, boofreak
  • Re: Is this rare?, David Nakamoto
• Telescope market size?, boofreak
  • Re: Telescope market size?, Pierre Vandevennne
  • Re: Telescope market size?, Tim Killian
• Orion 90mm AZ refractor - review, comparison, observing report, boofreak
• Measure Moon's Parallax, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Measure Moon's Parallax, Tim Auton
  • Re: Measure Moon's Parallax, Mike Thomas
    • Re: Measure Moon's Parallax, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Measure Moon's Parallax, md
    • Re: Measure Moon's Parallax, Kool Aid
  • Re: Measure Moon's Parallax, Paul Schlyter
    • Re: Measure Moon's Parallax, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Measure Moon's Parallax, Anthony Ayiomamitis
    • Re: Measure Moon's Parallax, CLT
• Sure to be a classic "Bad Astrononomy Movie", Stan Jensen
  • Re: Sure to be a classic "Bad Astrononomy Movie", Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Sure to be a classic "Bad Astrononomy Movie", Marty
    • Re: Sure to be a classic "Bad Astrononomy Movie", Matthew Ota
      • Re: Sure to be a classic "Bad Astrononomy Movie", Tom McDonald
  • Re: Sure to be a classic "Bad Astrononomy Movie", Davoud
  • Re: Sure to be a classic "Bad Astrononomy Movie", Coppy Littlehouse
    • Re: Sure to be a classic "Bad Astrononomy Movie", Tim Killian
      • Re: Sure to be a classic "Bad Astrononomy Movie", Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Sure to be a classic "Bad Astrononomy Movie", Jim
  • Re: Sure to be a classic "Bad Astrononomy Movie", dougspeterson
    • Re: Sure to be a classic "Bad Astrononomy Movie", Pierre Vandevenne
• Remote sense, Mick
  • Re: Remote sense, Starlord
    • Re: Remote sense, Mick
• wedge first light, md
  • Re: wedge first light, William R. Mattil
    • Re: wedge first light, md
  • Re: wedge first light, RMOLLISE
    • Re: wedge first light, md
      • Re: wedge first light, md
• giant solar prominence, nytecam
• Meade ETX-125 AT vs. EC, Pippen
  • Re: Meade ETX-125 AT vs. EC, Pippen
    • Re: Meade ETX-125 AT vs. EC, Anders Eklöf
      • Re: Meade ETX-125 AT vs. EC, md
• Re: Orion StarMax 102mm EQ or AstroView 120mm EQ?, larrymiracle
  • Re: Orion StarMax 102mm EQ or AstroView 120mm EQ?, Doink
  • Re: Orion StarMax 102mm EQ or AstroView 120mm EQ?, Doink
• Refractor question, larrymiracle
  • Re: Refractor question, Doink
    • Re: Refractor question, Howard Lester
      • Re: Refractor question, Doink
      • Re: Refractor question, Howard Lester
      • Re: Refractor question, Doink
      • Re: Refractor question, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Refractor question, Howard Lester
  • Re: Refractor question, Mark S. Holden
  • Re: Refractor question, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Refractor question, boofreak
    • Re: Refractor question, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Refractor question, larrymiracle
    • Re: Refractor question, Tim Killian
    • Re: Refractor question, Stephen Paul
• Seeing - backyard vs country, Dan
  • Re: Seeing - backyard vs country, Davoud
  • Re: Seeing - backyard vs country, Dan Mckenna
  • Re: Seeing - backyard vs country, Chris.B
    • Re: Seeing - backyard vs country, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: Seeing - backyard vs country, Chris.B
  • Re: Seeing - backyard vs country, Hilton Evans
  • Re: Seeing - backyard vs country, John Nichols
  • Re: Seeing - backyard vs country, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Seeing - backyard vs country, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Seeing - backyard vs country, Dan
• A quick visit with on old friend, Nick Theodorakis
  • Re: A quick visit with on old friend, Martin
  • Re: A quick visit with on old friend, Starlord
• a world of truth, Mick
  • Re: a world of truth, Peter Walker
    • Re: a world of truth, Tom McDonald
    • Re: a world of truth, Mick
    • Re: a world of truth, Ed T
      • Re: a world of truth, Marty
      • Re: a world of truth, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: a world of truth, T.T.
      • Re: a world of truth, Shawn
• Observing report, TV76, 9/2/2005, Florian
  • Re: Observing report, TV76, 9/2/2005, Davoud
• Conclusion of ED100 saga, Doink
  • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, AstroHoney
    • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Doink
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, AstroHoney
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Doink
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, AstroHoney
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Doink
    • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, AstroHoney
    • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, AstroHoney
  • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Jan Owen
    • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Doink
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Chris.B
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Doink
  • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, jerry warner
    • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Doink
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Doink
  • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, John Deer
    • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Doink
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Chris.B
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Doink
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, bratislav3162
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Doink
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, bratislav3162
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Doink
      • Re: Conclusion of ED100 saga, Brian Tung
• Cherokee #5: Pronto & Bootes, Cherokee
  • Re: Cherokee #5: Pronto & Bootes, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: Cherokee #5: Pronto & Bootes, Cherokee
  • Re: Cherokee #5: Pronto & Bootes, tony_flanders
  • Re: Cherokee #5: Pronto & Bootes, Jan Owen
• Re: star hopping, boo
• Re: Astrophotography with the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT, fleemo17
  • Re: Astrophotography with the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT, G.T.
• WARNING & ALERT: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Sam Wormley
  • Re: WARNING & ALERT: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, boo
    • Re: WARNING & ALERT: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Sam Wormley
      • Re: WARNING & ALERT: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Tom McDonald
      • Re: WARNING & ALERT: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: WARNING & ALERT: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Tom McDonald
      • Re: WARNING & ALERT: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: WARNING & ALERT: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Jan Owen
      • Re: WARNING & ALERT: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Anthony Ayiomamitis
  • Re: WARNING & ALERT: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Greg Crinklaw
    • Re: WARNING & ALERT: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Sam Wormley
      • Re: WARNING & ALERT: Geomagnetic K-Index of 6 expected, Marty
• Re: Slow moving object spotted near M11, Uncle Bob
• Did I see a satellite or what?, Jethro
  • Re: Did I see a satellite or what?, SkySea@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Did I see a satellite or what?, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: Did I see a satellite or what?, John Nichols
      • Re: Did I see a satellite or what?, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Did I see a satellite or what?, John Nichols
      • Re: Did I see a satellite or what?, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Did I see a satellite or what?, Starlord
  • Re: Did I see a satellite or what?, md
  • Re: Did I see a satellite or what?, boo
  • Message not available
    • Re: Did I see a satellite or what?, Nick Theodorakis
• Why no 6x42 binos?, mizar730
  • Re: Why no 6x42 binos?, Jan Owen
    • Re: Why no 6x42 binos?, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Why no 6x42 binos?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Why no 6x42 binos?, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Why no 6x42 binos?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Why no 6x42 binos?, mizar730
      • Re: Why no 6x42 binos?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Why no 6x42 binos?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Why no 6x42 binos?, tony_flanders
      • Re: Why no 6x42 binos?, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Why no 6x42 binos?, mizar730
• Fitchburg MA Astronomy Club?, Phil Trevorrow
  • Re: Fitchburg MA Astronomy Club?, Carl & Sherri
• Bushnell SpaceMaster eyepiece., rowmart
  • Re: Bushnell SpaceMaster eyepiece., Starlord
  • Re: Bushnell SpaceMaster eyepiece., Martymart8864
• No Lights!, Starlord
  • Re: No Lights!, Greg Crinklaw
    • Re: No Lights!, Starlord
      • Re: No Lights!, Greg Crinklaw
  • Re: No Lights!, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: No Lights!, Jan Owen
      • Re: No Lights!, Esmail Bonakdarian
    • Re: No Lights!, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: No Lights!, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: No Lights!, Tom McDonald
      • Re: No Lights!, Ioannis
      • Re: No Lights!, William R. Mattil
      • Re: No Lights!, Starlord
      • Re: No Lights!, Mick
      • Re: No Lights!, Marty
      • Re: No Lights!, JATO
  • Re: No Lights!, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: No Lights!, Starlord
      • Re: No Lights!, Mob_rule
• Heating Coronal Loops, Sam Wormley
• Re: star hopping [Ammendment], Stephen Paul
  • Re: star hopping [Ammendment], jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
    • Re: star hopping [Ammendment], Marty
    • Re: star hopping [Ammendment], Stephen Paul
      • Re: star hopping [Ammendment], jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: star hopping [Ammendment], Stephen Paul
      • Re: star hopping [Ammendment], jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: star hopping [Ammendment], Stephen Paul
      • Re: star hopping [Ammendment], jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: star hopping [Ammendment], Stephen Paul
      • Re: star hopping [Ammendment], jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
• Re: Any RegiStax gurus here ?, spiral_72
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Any RegiStax gurus here ?, Davoud
    • Message not available
      • Re: Any RegiStax gurus here ?, Davoud
  • Re: Any RegiStax gurus here ?, G.T.
  • Re: Any RegiStax gurus here ?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Any RegiStax gurus here ?, David Nakamoto
• A night of open clusters and double stars, orion94nl
  • Re: A night of open clusters and double stars, Larry Stedman
    • Re: A night of open clusters and double stars, orion94nl
• Baader FFC information request??, Rodney Owens
  • Re: Baader FFC information request??, Stephen Paul
• Rat Notes: AP 160 First Light Comments, rat ~( );>
  • Re: Rat Notes: AP 160 First Light Comments, Tim Killian
    • Re: Rat Notes: AP 160 First Light Comments, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Rat Notes: AP 160 First Light Comments, mizar730
      • Re: Rat Notes: AP 160 First Light Comments, Howard Lester
      • Re: Rat Notes: AP 160 First Light Comments, mizar730
      • Re: Rat Notes: AP 160 First Light Comments, G.T.
      • Re: Rat Notes: AP 160 First Light Comments, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Rat Notes: AP 160 First Light Comments, Tim Killian
      • Re: Rat Notes: AP 160 First Light Comments, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Rat Notes: AP 160 First Light Comments, jerry warner
  • Re: Rat Notes: AP 160 First Light Comments, jerry warner
• Building a computer controlled telescope., none
  • Re: Building a computer controlled telescope., Martin Brown
    • Re: Building a computer controlled telescope., none
  • Re: Building a computer controlled telescope., Roger Hamlett
    • Re: Building a computer controlled telescope., none
      • Re: Building a computer controlled telescope., Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Building a computer controlled telescope., Roger Hamlett
  • Re: Building a computer controlled telescope., szaki
    • Re: Building a computer controlled telescope., none
      • Re: Building a computer controlled telescope., szaki
• Alberta Star Party on the ropes, Mick
  • Re: Alberta Star Party on the ropes, Havriliak
    • Re: Alberta Star Party on the ropes, Mick
      • Re: Alberta Star Party on the ropes, Zarkovic
      • Re: Alberta Star Party on the ropes, Mick
• Re: NYC Events 1/2 Sep 1/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: NYC Events 1/2 Sep 2/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: NYC Events 1/2 Sep 3/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: NYC Events 1/2 Sep 4/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: NYC Events 1/2 Sep 5/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: NYC Events 1/2 Sep 6/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: NYC Events 2/2 Sep 1/ 7, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: NYC Events 2/2 Sep 2/ 7, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: NYC Events 2/2 Sep 3/ 7, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: NYC Events 2/2 Sep 4/ 7, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: NYC Events 2/2 Sep 5/ 7, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: NYC Events 2/2 Sep 6/ 7, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: NYC Events 2/2 Sep 7/ 7, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: AAA News Sep 2005 1/ 3, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: AAA News Sep 2005 2/ 3, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: AAA News Sep 2005 3/ 3, JOHN PAZMINO
• Heard from Rod M?, Uncle Bob
  • Re: Heard from Rod M?, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Heard from Rod M?, Hilton Evans
• LZOS and APO lenses, Tim Killian
  • Re: LZOS and APO lenses, AFM
  • Re: LZOS and APO lenses, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: LZOS and APO lenses, nick
• Re: Question on Mirror Coating, Michael McCulloch
• Bushnell Telescopes, eflaspo
  • Re: Bushnell Telescopes, Stu
  • Re: Bushnell Telescopes, Michael Wood
  • Re: Bushnell Telescopes, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Bushnell Telescopes, Starlord
• OT Warning: Living in a Bar..., Davoud
  • Re: OT Warning: Living in a Bar..., Shazzam
    • Re: OT Warning: Living in a Bar..., Davoud
      • Re: OT Warning: Living in a Bar..., G.T.
  • Re: OT Warning: Living in a Bar..., Gobbletwo
• Orion 150mm Mak, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Orion 150mm Mak, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Orion 150mm Mak, David Nakamoto
• Re: replicating "old" science, Pierre Vandevenne
• HUBBLE MAKES MOVIE OF NEPTUNE'S DYNAMIC ATMOSPHERE (STScI-PRC05-22), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
• two big solar proms [Sept1], nytecam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • two big solar proms [Sept1], nytecam
• C-11 vs.C-14, szaki
  • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, Bob May
  • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, John Savard
    • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, szaki
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, szaki
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, John Savard
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, Mick
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, szaki
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, Brian Tung
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, szaki
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, Stuart Chapman
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, szaki
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, Tom Royer
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, Stuart Chapman
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, Shawn
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, John Savard
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, Brian Tung
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, Joe Bergeron
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, szaki
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, szaki
      • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, CLT
  • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, SkySea@xxxxxxx
  • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, nytecam
    • Re: C-11 vs.C-14, George Normandin
• Re: Chaos Manor South Update, Mike Simmons
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Chaos Manor South Update, edward12@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Complaint Filed, Starlord
  • Re: Complaint Filed, Meksican Invasion
  • Re: Complaint Filed, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Complaint Filed, just me
    • Re: Complaint Filed, Starlord
• Re: Average nightsky Luminosity in space?, Stuart Levy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Average nightsky Luminosity in space?, George Normandin
• Controller for Orion Atlas 10 inch, canopus56
• Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Doink
  • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Meksican Invasion
    • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Howard Lester
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, nick
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, nick
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, AstroHoney
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Brian Tung
  • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Mark S. Holden
    • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Doink
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Martin Brown
  • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Meksican Invasion
  • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, William R. Mattil
    • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, William R. Mattil
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Jan Owen
    • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Doink
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, John Deer
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Doink
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, AstroHoney
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Doink
      • Re: Refractors, Diffraction Rings?, Colin J Denman
• Chuck Taylor please...., Doink
  • Re: Chuck Taylor please...., CLT
    • Re: Chuck Taylor please...., Doink
• ALERT: Geomagnetic K-index of 6, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ALERT: Geomagnetic K-index of 6, Sam Wormley
• HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE BEGINS "TWO GYRO" SCIENCE OPERATIONS (STScI-PR05-24), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
  • Re: HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE BEGINS "TWO GYRO" SCIENCE OPERATIONS (STScI-PR05-24), Ed
• Test for false Color?, Doink
  • Re: Test for false Color?, Ed T
  • Re: Test for false Color?, Meksican Invasion
• Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Doink
  • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, lal_truckee
    • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Meksican Invasion
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Markus Ludes
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Herb York
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Doink
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Shazzam
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Herb York
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Herb York
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, maureen
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mark D
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, G.T.
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Anthony Ayiomamitis
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mark D
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Chris.B
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mob_rule
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Bill Becker
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mark S. Holden
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Doink
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Herb York
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mark S. Holden
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Tim Killian
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Doink
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Shazzam
    • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Doink
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, lal_truckee
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Tim Killian
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, lal_truckee
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, rat ~( );>
  • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, John Savard
    • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Gobbletwo
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Ed T
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Gobbletwo
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Doink
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, jonisaacs@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Gobbletwo
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, lal_truckee
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Markus Ludes
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Ed T
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, jerry warner
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Doink
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mob_rule
      • Message not available
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mob_rule
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Markus Ludes
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mob_rule
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mark D
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, Mob_rule
    • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, james
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, offaxis2
  • Re: Warning ! TMB Apo 8"F/9 Ser. Nr. 030 , read, szaki
• Re: LOTS of false color on Orion 100mm APO, Doink
  • Re: LOTS of false color on Orion 100mm APO, Howard Lester
    • Re: LOTS of false color on Orion 100mm APO, Doink
      • Re: LOTS of false color on Orion 100mm APO, Mark S. Holden
      • HELP, Doink
      • Re: HELP, Jan Owen
  • Re: LOTS of false color on Orion 100mm APO, Tim Auton
    • Re: LOTS of false color on Orion 100mm APO, Chris.B
      • Re: LOTS of false color on Orion 100mm APO, Doink
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: LOTS of false color on Orion 100mm APO, CLT
• Re: What's the poop on the C6?, Chuck
• Re: Club site smoking?, Mark
  • Re: Club site smoking?, Dave Jessie
  • Re: Club site smoking?, lal_truckee
    • Re: Club site smoking?, Mark
• Re: God Bless US??? Heh?, katrinaxx
  • Re: God Bless US??? Heh?, Jan Owen
    • Re: God Bless US??? Heh?, katrinaxx
  • Re: God Bless US??? Heh?, Marty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: God Bless US??? Heh?, Meksican Invasion
  • Re: God Bless US??? Heh?, Ben Bradley
• Americans are embarrassing themselves..., Rock Steel
  • Re: Americans are embarrassing themselves..., Dan Mckenna
    • Re: Americans are embarrassing themselves..., richard schumacher
  • Re: Americans are embarrassing themselves..., DaveMan
  • Re: Americans are embarrassing themselves..., Richard F.L.R.Snashall
• September Que tal in the Current Skies Now Available, Bob Riddle
• Dark Skies West, Dark Skies East, tony_flanders
  • Re: Dark Skies West, Dark Skies East, starburst
  • Re: Dark Skies West, Dark Skies East, CNJ999
  • Message not available
    • Re: Dark Skies West, Dark Skies East, allisonki
• Re: How long for AP160?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How long for AP160?, John Deer
    • Re: How long for AP160?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: How long for AP160?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: How long for AP160?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: How long for AP160?, rat ~( );>
    • Re: How long for AP160?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: How long for AP160?, John Deer
      • Re: How long for AP160?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How long for AP160?, Vlad_the_Skeptical
• Re: Dammed Lights, B . Franklin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dammed Lights, Marty
• Re: Dominion over the Earth?? heh?, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dominion over the Earth?? heh?, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Re: Dominion over the Earth?? heh?, Ioannis
      • Re: Dominion over the Earth?? heh?, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: Dominion over the Earth?? heh?, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Re: Dominion over the Earth?? heh?, Shawn
  • Re: Dominion over the Earth?? heh?, Blaine Baxter
• Re: Galaxy in our midst, geraldkelleher
• Re: Sirius!, John Nichols
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sirius!, Stuart Levy
• Nuevo sitio web de astronomía, astraco
  • 10th Planet Discovery Paper, Tom Kirke
  • Re: Nuevo sitio web de astronomía, Meksican Invasion
• Re: Some Americans are embarrassing themselves......., Richard F.L.R.Snashall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Some Americans are embarrassing themselves......., Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: Some Americans are embarrassing themselves......., Davoud
    • Re: Some Americans are embarrassing themselves......., Wayne Howell
  • Re: Some Americans are embarrassing themselves......., Meksican Invasion
• Re: HEQ-5 EQ mounts GOTO, szaki
  • Re: HEQ-5 EQ mounts GOTO, Phil Smith
    • Re: HEQ-5 EQ mounts GOTO, szaki