Re: creation
- From: John Hyde <EJHyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 23:51:00 -0700
On 10/9/2005 11:09 AM, Tom wrote:
This is where the problems begin. I have never seen or heard of a test that proves the universe is older than a few thousand to a few tens of thousands years old. That is utter crap.
Then it's time you step out of your closet and open your eyes and ears! There are plenty of celestial objects much farther away than some tens or thousands of light years. If the universe was a mere tens of thousands of years old, the light from these objects wouldn't have had the time to reach us yet and we would not be able to see them.
Since we have never been to these other light sources, how do we measure the time it takes for light to travel between them and Earth?
As far as using light years is concerned, this ISN'T SCIENCE. It's Mathematics. That is if we could count from the source which I would honestly really like to know how that can be done.
Brian Tung explained this science / math issue earlier today. Were'nt you paying attention? Or are you being deliberatly obtuse?
.
- References:
- Re: creation
- From: Tom
- Re: creation
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: creation
- From: Tom
- Re: creation
- From: Tom
- Re: creation
- Prev by Date: Re: creation
- Next by Date: Re: Serious camera question
- Previous by thread: Re: creation
- Next by thread: Re: creation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|