sci.astro.amateur

• Date Index

---

• Meteor in Kent, UK?, Vernon
• Advice on photo stacking, gingerdazza
• Newbie Celestron StarHopper Assistance, Snowman
• Newbie Question, wbtancer
  • Re: Newbie Question, Brian Tung
    • Re: Newbie Question, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Newbie Question, Chris L Peterson
• starter scope - reducing options, J Lunis
  • Re: starter scope - reducing options, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: starter scope - reducing options, Doink
      • Re: starter scope - reducing options, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Re: starter scope - reducing options, Stephen Paul
• When computer geeks start defining time, Tim Killian
  • Re: When computer geeks start defining time, Brian Tung
    • Re: When computer geeks start defining time, George
  • Re: When computer geeks start defining time, Skywise
  • Re: When computer geeks start defining time, Eric
    • Re: When computer geeks start defining time, Skywise
• Re: Gravity pobe B papers ?, oriel36
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gravity pobe B papers ?, Sam Wormley
• Light Polution Filter / Photography question...., Sailing Away
• If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., Arnold
  • Re: If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., Davoud
  • Re: If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., Sam Wormley
  • Re: If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., Bert Hyman
    • Re: If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., Joe S.
    • Re: If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., john carruthers
  • Re: If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., Joe S.
• Re: science sense and common sense, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Stuart Levy
  • Re: science sense and common sense, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Robert Grumbine
• Re: Can a gamma ray burst make me blind ???, Skywise
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can a gamma ray burst make me blind ???, Skywise
    • Re: Can a gamma ray burst make me blind ???, George
  • Re: Can a gamma ray burst make me blind ???, Eric
    • Re: Can a gamma ray burst make me blind ???, George
• Making a homemade focal reducer, tedkord
  • Re: Making a homemade focal reducer, Roger Hamlett
    • Re: Making a homemade focal reducer, tedkord
• Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, Glenn Holliday
  • Re: Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, trosenfeld
    • Re: Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, Glenn Holliday
  • Re: Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, David G. Nagel
      • Re: Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, Glenn Holliday
• Dead Time in Rosamond, Starlord
  • Re: Dead Time in Rosamond, Stuart Chapman
    • Re: Dead Time in Rosamond, Starlord
  • Re: Dead Time in Rosamond, Tom
    • Re: Dead Time in Rosamond, Starlord
      • Re: Dead Time in Rosamond, Mike Simmons
• New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, John Banister
  • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, Starlord
    • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, John Banister
      • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, Starlord
      • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, Craig M . Bobchin
  • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, john carruthers
    • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, John Banister
      • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, rat ~( );>
    • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, g626700-groups
      • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, Shawn
      • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, urban astronomer
      • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, Shawn
• Good starting telescope and book for child, lifeisgood
  • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Brian Tung
  • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, g626700-groups
  • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Robert Grumbine
  • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Doink
    • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Jan Owen
      • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Doink
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, FSaxwas9
      • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Starlord
    • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, g626700-groups
• Vatican astronomer: Science and faith do not contradict, Hilton Evans
• meade ds 90, cavalier1968
• Software advice for stacking photos, gingerdazza
  • Re: Software advice for stacking photos, Beta Persei
    • Re: Software advice for stacking photos, William C. Keel
  • Re: Software advice for stacking photos, David Nakamoto
• Re: Philips tricked me!!, Sailing Away
• intro help, bobby . kasthuri
  • Re: intro help, Starlord
  • Re: intro help, Mean Mr Mustard
  • Re: intro help, Jay Swartzfeger
• zhummel dobs, hansolo
  • Re: zhummel dobs, Doink
    • Re: zhummel dobs, Ernie Dunbar
      • Re: zhummel dobs, Doink
      • Re: zhummel dobs, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: zhummel dobs, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: zhummel dobs, Florian
      • Re: zhummel dobs, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: zhummel dobs, Doink
    • Re: zhummel dobs, Ernie Dunbar
      • Re: zhummel dobs, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: zhummel dobs, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: zhummel dobs, Mark
• webcam recommendations for astrophotography?, Eric
  • Re: webcam recommendations for astrophotography?, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: webcam recommendations for astrophotography?, Eric
    • Re: webcam recommendations for astrophotography?, Uncle Bob
  • Re: webcam recommendations for astrophotography?, David Nakamoto
    • Re: webcam recommendations for astrophotography?, Eric
• [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Florian
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Alson Wong
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, George
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Florian
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, George
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Florian
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, George
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Florian
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, William Hamblen
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, John Shakespeare
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, G.T.
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Alson Wong
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Sailing Away
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, George
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Sailing Away
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, john carruthers
      • Re: Where is M13?, Tom Polakis
      • Re: Where is M13?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Where is M13?, John Shakespeare
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Doink
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Jay Swartzfeger
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
  • Re: Where is M13?, canopus56
  • Re: Where is M13?, canopus56
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Paul Schlyter
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Robin Leadbeater
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Harry F . Leopold
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Starlord
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, john carruthers
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, David G. Nagel
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Florian
• Planetarium Software, Kevin
  • Re: Planetarium Software, Brian Tung
  • Re:Astro: Planetarium Software, Sjouke Burry
• Why .avi format ?, Tom Rauschenbach
  • Re: Why .avi format ?, Michael McCulloch
    • Re: Why .avi format ?, Carsten A. Arnholm
  • Re: Why .avi format ?, Davoud
    • Re: Why .avi format ?, Tom Rauschenbach
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, Davoud
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, Chuck Taylor
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why .avi format ?, William Hamblen
  • Re: Why .avi format ?, David Nakamoto
• "Telescope" problem same in camera world, Rich
  • Re: "Telescope" problem same in camera world, G.T.
    • Re: "Telescope" problem same in camera world, Rich
  • Re: "Telescope" problem same in camera world, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: "Telescope" problem same in camera world, David Nakamoto
• opinions/experience with Orion short-tube 4.5" reflector, FSaxwas9
  • Re: opinions/experience with Orion short-tube 4.5" reflector, FSaxwas9
• M31 at last, Pete Lawrence
  • Re: M31 at last, David Nakamoto
    • Re: M31 at last, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: M31 at last, George
    • Re: M31 at last, Pete Lawrence
      • Re: M31 at last, George
      • Re: M31 at last, Rich
      • Re: M31 at last, George
  • Re: M31 at last, Tom Randy
  • Re: M31 at last, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: M31 at last, pete lawrence
      • Re: M31 at last, G.T.
      • Re: M31 at last, Pete Lawrence
  • Re: M31 at last, Arnie
    • Re: M31 at last, pete lawrence
    • Re: M31 at last, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: M31 at last, caryrjr
• new telrad finder charts, nigel_sampson70
  • Re: new telrad finder charts, Doink
• On top/bottom posting... definitely OFF TOPIC (LONG), Larry Stedman
  • Re: On top/bottom posting... definitely OFF TOPIC (LONG), per.corell@xxxxxxxxx
• Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, william . lugg
  • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, tkuniok
    • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, Stephen Paul
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, william . lugg
    • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, David Nakamoto
  • Single Axis vs. Dual Axis Drives, william . lugg
    • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis Drives, Bill Becker
    • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis Drives, Chuck Taylor
• two quick questions, Jason Watters
  • Re: two quick questions, Sam Wormley
    • Re: two quick questions, oriel36
  • Re: two quick questions, oriel36
  • Re: two quick questions, canopus56
    • Re: two quick questions, oriel36
• Google Groups Problem?, RAMangold
• C-8 and 2-inch eyepieces?, George Normandin
  • Re: C-8 and 2-inch eyepieces?, Stephen Paul
    • Re: C-8 and 2-inch eyepieces?, Ol' Duffer
  • Re: C-8 and 2-inch eyepieces?, William Hamblen
    • Re: C-8 and 2-inch eyepieces?, Rich
  • Re: C-8 and 2-inch eyepieces?, Scott Smith
• Wood legs and cold temps...., Stephen Paul
  • Re: Wood legs and cold temps...., George
  • Re: Wood legs and cold temps...., Shawn
• FAQ and cold weather gear, Tom Rauschenbach
  • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, Starlord
  • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, Stephen Paul
  • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, George Normandin
  • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, john carruthers
    • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, George Normandin
      • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, Starlord
      • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, Tom Rauschenbach
      • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, George Normandin
  • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, Andy Blackburn
• Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, George Normandin
    • Re: Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, George Normandin
  • Re: Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, Alson Wong
• Making a telescope, callisto
  • Re: Making a telescope, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Making a telescope, Starlord
  • Re: Making a telescope, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: Making a telescope, George Hein
  • Re: Making a telescope, rcyoung
    • Re: Making a telescope, Jan Owen
      • Re: Making a telescope, Howard Lester
  • Re: Making a telescope, Bob May
    • Re: Making a telescope, callisto
  • Re: Making a telescope, Jan Owen
  • Re: Making a telescope, john carruthers
  • Re: Making a telescope, Roger Hamlett
    • Re: Making a telescope, George Hein
      • Re: Making a telescope, rcyoung
  • Re: Making a telescope, jeff
• Hubbell Barnyard Sky Caps For Sale--Light Polluction Reduction, W. Watson
  • Re: Hubbell Barnyard Sky Caps For Sale--Light Polluction Reduction, blart
• buying used>?, FSaxwas9
  • Re: buying used>?, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: buying used>?, Starlord
  • Re: buying used>?, Stephen Paul
• solar prom activity, nytecam
• Feedback on Antares Refractors?, daveponder
  • Re: Feedback on Antares Refractors?, smsastro
    • Re: Feedback on Antares Refractors?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Feedback on Antares Refractors?, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Feedback on Antares Refractors?, Doink
  • Re: Feedback on Antares Refractors?, laura halliday
• Off-topic question, Joe S.
  • Re: Off-topic question, Starlord
• Setup for DSO hunter, Ioannis
  • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Florian
    • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Ioannis
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Tom Rauschenbach
  • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Martin R. Howell
    • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Ioannis
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Ioannis
  • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, elaich
    • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Ioannis
    • Re: Setup for DSO hunter (top posting), Roger Steer
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter (top posting), Brian Tung
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter (top posting), Ioannis
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter (top posting), G.T.
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter (top posting), Tom Rauschenbach
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter (top posting), Larry Stedman
  • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Arnold
    • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Ioannis
  • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, elaich
• Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, laura halliday
  • Re: Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, Phil Wheeler
    • Message not available
      • Re: Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, Joe
  • Re: Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, Howard Lester
  • Re: Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, Mark Gingrich
• Orion XT maillist?, Dan Wenz
  • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Dan Wenz
  • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Joe S.
    • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Dan Wenz
      • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Starlord
  • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Starlord
    • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Starlord
      • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Phil Wheeler
• APML?, J McBride
• Re: which telescope to buy???, RMOLLISE
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: which telescope to buy???, RMOLLISE
  • Re: which telescope to buy???, Starlord
  • Re: which telescope to buy???, Uncle Bob
    • Re: which telescope to buy???, Stephen Paul
      • Re: which telescope to buy???, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: which telescope to buy???, Stephen Paul
      • Re: which telescope to buy???, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: which telescope to buy???, Uncle Bob
• Collimation?, bolt thrower
  • Re: Collimation?, Doink
  • Re: Collimation?, Chuck Taylor
    • Re: Collimation?, Jan Owen
  • Re: Collimation?, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Collimation?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Collimation?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Collimation?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Collimation?, Doink
  • Re: Collimation?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Collimation?, Uncle Bob
    • Re: Collimation?, Starlord
  • Re: Collimation?, canopus56
    • Re: Collimation?, Chuck Taylor
• NexStar 8i help please, Joe
  • Re: NexStar 8i help please, RMOLLISE
    • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Joe
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Wade A. Hilmo
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Joe
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Wade A. Hilmo
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, daveponder
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Joe
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Robert Sheaffer
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, RMOLLISE
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, RMOLLISE
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Joe
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, jsavard
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, RMOLLISE
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Joe
• Orion "AccuFocus", RAMangold
  • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", Shawn
    • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", RAMangold
      • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", Doink
      • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", RAMangold
      • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", George
      • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", RAMangold
      • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", Phil Wheeler
• Opinions on Orion Astroview 120 ST, Rob
  • Re: Opinions on Orion Astroview 120 ST, Doink
    • Re: Opinions on Orion Astroview 120 ST, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Opinions on Orion Astroview 120 ST, Doink
  • Re: Opinions on Orion Astroview 120 ST, bob
  • Re: Opinions on Orion Astroview 120 ST, RMOLLISE
• GM8 Question..., Doink
  • Re: GM8 Question..., Stephen Paul
    • Re: GM8 Question..., Doink
  • Re: GM8 Question..., Steve Sherman
    • Re: GM8 Question..., Coppy Littlehouse
  • Re: GM8 Question..., Mark D
    • Re: GM8 Question..., Mij Adyaw
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Doink
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Stephen Paul
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Coppy Littlehouse
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Mij Adyaw
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Coppy Littlehouse
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Steve Sherman
  • Re: GM8 Question..., Uncle Bob
    • Re: GM8 Question..., Doink
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Steve Sherman
• Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), callisto
  • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), tony_flanders
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), CNJ999
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Sam Wormley
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), CNJ999
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Sam Wormley
  • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Joe S.
    • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Doink
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Coppy Littlehouse
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), urban astronomer
• Japanese probe - Hayabusa had touched down on asteroid itokawa afterall, jhaveri_alay
• Space X News, Starlord
• konus 500 short tube reflector, hansolo
  • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, George
    • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, Doink
      • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, Jan Owen
      • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, Doink
      • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, Jan Owen
  • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, hansolo
    • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, Jan Owen
• Re: Criterion Dynamax 8 help, offshore79
  • Re: Criterion Dynamax 8 help, Gil
• Universal Astronomics MicroStar, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Universal Astronomics MicroStar, Doink
    • Re: Universal Astronomics MicroStar, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Universal Astronomics MicroStar, tony_flanders
    • Re: Universal Astronomics MicroStar, Stephen Paul
• William Optics / Burgess Binoviewer, Paul Murphy
  • Re: William Optics / Burgess Binoviewer, George Hein
    • Re: William Optics / Burgess Binoviewer, RMOLLISE
    • Re: William Optics / Burgess Binoviewer, Stephen Paul
• Mnemonic for the galactic equator constellations?, canopus56
  • Re: Mnemonic for the galactic equator constellations?, callisto
    • Re: Mnemonic for the galactic equator constellations?, canopus56
• Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, canopus56
  • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, canopus56
  • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Tom Polakis
    • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Bryan Putnam
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Brian Tung
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Harry F . Leopold
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Brian Tung
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Harry F . Leopold
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Harry F . Leopold
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, canopus56
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, canopus56
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Bryan Putnam
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Brian Tung
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Bryan Putnam
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Brian Tung
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, canopus56
    • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Brian Tung
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Tom Polakis
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, SkySea
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, John Savard
• Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!, Vernon
• XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Kwai Chang Caine
  • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Phil
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), g626700-groups
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Kevin
  • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Ed B.
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Dennis Woos
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), tony_flanders
  • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Wade A. Hilmo
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Starlord
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Mij Adyaw
  • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Kwai Chang Caine
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Starlord
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Wade A. Hilmo
      • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Kwai Chang Caine
      • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Phil Wheeler
• Another relativity thought..., Doink
  • Re: Another relativity thought..., Davoud
  • Re: Another relativity thought..., Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Another relativity thought..., Robert Grumbine
      • Re: Another relativity thought..., Dan Wenz
• XT-10 vs XT-12, Joe S.
  • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Jan Owen
    • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, fcathell
  • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Shawn
  • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Stephen Paul
    • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, g626700-groups
      • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Gaz
  • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Michael McCulloch
• Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, canopus56
  • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, md
    • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, canopus56
  • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, Brian Tung
  • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, allisonki
    • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, canopus56
    • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, canopus56
  • Message not available
    • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, canopus56
  • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, Alan Baxter
• Some advice needed for newcomer, gingerdazza
  • Re: Some advice needed for newcomer, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Some advice needed for newcomer, Doink
      • Re: Some advice needed for newcomer, gingerdazza
      • Re: Some advice needed for newcomer, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Some advice needed for newcomer, nytecam
• blue mars ?, James Vincent
  • Re: blue mars ?, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: blue mars ?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: blue mars ?, Joe S.
• spectral hotspot in Cygnus, nytecam
• want to go to Kitt Peak for imaging? (December 7th), pslipscomb
• GOOGLE SKY, Anibalito
  • Re: GOOGLE SKY, RMOLLISE
    • Re: GOOGLE SKY, William C. Keel
  • Re: GOOGLE SKY, urban astronomer
  • Re: GOOGLE SKY, Tom Polakis
• Strange event, Starlord
  • Re: Strange event, avivancom
    • Re: Strange event, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Strange event, Starlord
      • Re: Strange event, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: Strange event, Joe S.
    • Re: Strange event, Buzzygirl
      • Re: Strange event, john carruthers
• Converting Hyperleda galaxy dimensions to arcmins? How to, canopus56
  • Re: Converting Hyperleda galaxy dimensions to arcmins? How to, William C. Keel
    • Re: Converting Hyperleda galaxy dimensions to arcmins? How to, canopus56
    • Re: Converting Hyperleda galaxy dimensions to arcmins? How to, canopus56
• Weird passage in a book, Rich
  • Re: Weird passage in a book, Algomeysa2
    • Re: Weird passage in a book, james
    • Re: Weird passage in a book, John Savard
• Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), PD
• science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
  • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
    • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Paul Schlyter
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), John Savard
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Stephen Paul
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), mrgrytt
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Mij Adyaw
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), smarshallpaul
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Stephen Paul
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Mij Adyaw
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Martin Brown
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Martin Brown
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Shawn
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, John Savard
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, jsavard
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Martin Brown
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, John Savard
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, WinField
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, WinField
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Robert Grumbine
  • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Ed T
    • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Ed T
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Chris L Peterson
• Arp Peculiar Galaxy Catalogue too faint for amateurs?, canopus56
  • Re: Arp Peculiar Galaxy Catalogue too faint for amateurs?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Arp Peculiar Galaxy Catalogue too faint for amateurs?, Brian Tung
    • Re: Arp Peculiar Galaxy Catalogue too faint for amateurs?, canopus56
  • Re: Arp Peculiar Galaxy Catalogue too faint for amateurs?, David Nakamoto
• Webcam questions, Skywise
  • Re: Webcam questions, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Webcam questions, Skywise
      • Re: Webcam questions, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Webcam questions, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Webcam questions, Skywise
  • Re: Webcam questions, Robin Leadbeater
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Webcam questions, Davoud
• ep on astromart question, Jay Swartzfeger
• A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Shneor
  • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, G.T.
  • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Bert Hyman
    • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Bert Hyman
  • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Tim Killian
  • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, canopus56
    • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Coppy Littlehouse
  • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, FOXZ News Gored
• A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Larry Stedman
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Jan Owen
  • Perhaps not, was Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Brian Tung
    • Re: Perhaps not, was Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Shawn
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Shawn
    • Message not available
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Chris.B
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, elaich
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Hilton Evans
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Joe S.
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Shawn
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Martin R. Howell
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Tom Hise
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, elaich
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Tom Hise
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Mike Simmons
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Brian Tung
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Mike Simmons
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Tom Hise
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Shawn
      • Thanks for responses! A reply... (LONG without quotes), Larry Stedman
      • Re: Thanks for responses! A reply... (LONG without quotes), Starlord
      • Re: Thanks for responses! A reply... (LONG without quotes), Shawn
      • Re: Thanks for responses! A reply... (LONG without quotes), G.T.
      • Re: Thanks for responses! A reply... (LONG without quotes), Ed
  • Message not available
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Ed T
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, thad
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Chuck Taylor
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, RMOLLISE
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, RMOLLISE
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Brian Tung
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Brian Tung
• Venus casts a shadow..., Pete Lawrence
  • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Mark Gingrich
    • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Pete Lawrence
  • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Pete Lawrence
      • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Shawn
  • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Les Blalock
  • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., nytecam
    • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Pete Lawrence
    • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., nytecam
      • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Pete Lawrence
  • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., G.T.
• Re: BushnellŪ Voyager Reflector Telescope at Costco online store, zgseronik
• Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Adrian
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, wsnell01
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, jsavard
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Adrian
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Bob May
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, wsnell01
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Ed T
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, canopus56
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, zgseronik
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, wsnell01
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, jsavard
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, jeff
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Roger Hamlett
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Gil
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Tom Rauschenbach
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, richard schumacher
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, wsnell01
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, richard schumacher
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, wsnell01
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, richard schumacher
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, wsnell01
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Tim Killian
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Adrian
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Cutshot
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, decaf
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Cutshot
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, cutshot
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, cutshot
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, tedkord
• Old Scope New Life, Starlord
  • Re: Old Scope New Life, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Old Scope New Life, Howard Lester
    • Re: Old Scope New Life, Starlord
      • Re: Old Scope New Life, Doink
• Meade DSI software and controlling an Orion Atlas EQ-GT mount, canopus56
  • Re: Meade DSI software and controlling an Orion Atlas EQ-GT mount, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Meade DSI software and controlling an Orion Atlas EQ-GT mount, canopus56
      • Re: Meade DSI software and controlling an Orion Atlas EQ-GT mount, canopus56
• adapting orion intelliscope to other models?, kkduda
  • Re: adapting orion intelliscope to other models?, Phil Wheeler
• Venus 'under attacK' in dusk sky, nytecam
  • Re: Venus 'under attacK' in dusk sky, Rich
    • Re: Venus 'under attacK' in dusk sky, nytecam
      • Re: Venus 'under attacK' in dusk sky, G.T.
  • Re: Venus 'under attacK' in dusk sky, Florian
• suggestion for upgrading Celeston Super C8 plus, tlrouse
  • Re: suggestion for upgrading Celeston Super C8 plus, William Hamblen
    • Re: suggestion for upgrading Celeston Super C8 plus, RMOLLISE
• solar flare on east limb, nytecam
  • Re: solar flare on east limb, Doink
    • Message not available
      • Re: solar flare on east limb, nytecam
• Cassini gets the skinny on Saturn's rings, Sam Wormley
• Quaoar: Is it 2002 LM 60 or AW 197?, Scott Robert Ladd
  • Re: Quaoar: Is it 2002 LM 60 or AW 197?, Sam Wormley
• achromats needed for H-alpha light?, nytecam
  • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, William Hamblen
  • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Rich
      • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Rich
      • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Mark Gingrich
      • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Brian Tung
  • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Phil Wheeler
• stupidity and astronomy don't mix, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: stupidity and astronomy don't mix, Andrew Nicolle
    • Re: stupidity and astronomy don't mix, Jay Swartzfeger
    • Re: stupidity and astronomy don't mix, Joe S.
      • Re: stupidity and astronomy don't mix, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: stupidity and astronomy don't mix, Jan Owen
• 5x antares barlow, Max
  • Re: 5x antares barlow, JD
    • Re: 5x antares barlow, Hilton Evans
  • Re: 5x antares barlow, Hilton Evans
• Short night, Starlord
  • Re: Short night, Harry F . Leopold
    • Re: Short night, Starlord
      • Re: Short night, Harry F . Leopold
• Einstien, Mark F.
  • Re: Einstien, Hilton Evans
  • Re: Einstien, Brian Tung
  • Re: Einstien, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Einstien, oriel36
  • Re: Einstien, Llanzlan Klazmon
• two blue planets after dusk, nytecam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • two blue planets after dusk, nytecam
    • Re: two blue planets after dusk, Pierre
      • Re: two blue planets after dusk, nytecam
• How do you help astronomy?, sunwolf
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Starlord
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Bill Owen
    • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Martin Brown
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Martin Brown
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, lputerbaugh
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Davoud
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Buzzygirl
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Bob Schmall
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Steven Van Impe
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, oriel36
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, sunwolf
• "stone thrown west goes further", nytecam
  • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Joško Šugar
  • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Sailing Away
  • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Sam Wormley
    • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Sailing Away
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Sam Wormley
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Chris L Peterson
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Brian Tung
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Brian Tung
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Chris L Peterson
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Brian Tung
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", SkySea
  • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", lal_truckee
    • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Doink
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Marty
• Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, boofreak
  • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, tony_flanders
  • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Jay Swartzfeger
      • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, John Nichols
      • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Daniel A. Mitchell
      • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, tony_flanders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Jay Swartzfeger
      • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, wsnell01
      • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Roger Hamlett
  • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Starlord
  • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, John Nichols
• Deepsky Astronomy Software - Fundraiser for your club, Steven S Tuma
• celestron nexstar 8i or C10 NGT, meercat19
  • Re: celestron nexstar 8i or C10 NGT, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: celestron nexstar 8i or C10 NGT, Sailing Away
  • Re: celestron nexstar 8i or C10 NGT, RMOLLISE
  • Re: celestron nexstar 8i or C10 NGT, Stephen Paul
    • Re: celestron nexstar 8i or C10 NGT, RMOLLISE
• Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death (was: Will Rome Return? ), G.T.
  • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death (was: Will Rome Return? ), Florian
  • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death, Starlord
  • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death (was: Will Rome Return? ), Doink
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death (was: Will Rome Return? ), Brian Tung
    • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death (was: Will Rome Return? ), decaf
  • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death (was: Will Rome Return? ), Brian Tung
• Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, stlham59
  • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, Tom Rauschenbach
    • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, stlham59
      • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, tony_flanders
      • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, stlham59
  • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, tony_flanders
    • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, stlham59
      • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, tony_flanders
  • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, Ernie Wright
  • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, Brian Tung
• Mt.Wilson, Mark F.
  • Re: Mt.Wilson, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Mt.Wilson, G.T.
  • Re: Mt.Wilson, tkuniok
    • Re: Mt.Wilson, Starlord
  • Re: Mt.Wilson, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Mt.Wilson, Coppy Littlehouse
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Matthew Ota
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Brian Tung
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Gobbletwo
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Matthew Ota
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Mike Simmons
    • Re: Mt.Wilson, Gobbletwo
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Starlord
  • Re: Mt.Wilson, Mike Simmons
    • Re: Mt.Wilson, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Starlord
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Mike Simmons
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Mike Simmons
• Help With alt.binaries.pictures.astro, RAMangold
  • Re: Help With alt.binaries.pictures.astro, George
    • Re: Help With alt.binaries.pictures.astro, Terry Bohlsen
      • Re: Help With alt.binaries.pictures.astro, RAMangold
      • Re: Help With alt.binaries.pictures.astro, George
      • Message not available
      • Re: Help With alt.binaries.pictures.astro, George Normandin
• LEON-IDS (Shooting Stars ) are Coming !, jhaveri_alay
• clock driven equatorial mount., Zinc Potterman
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Tim Killian
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Sam Wormley
    • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Sam Wormley
    • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Tim Killian
    • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Phil Wheeler
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., RMOLLISE
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Roger Hamlett
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., laura halliday
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Phil Wheeler
    • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., David Nakamoto
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Martin Brown
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., nytecam
• When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, Sam Wormley
  • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, Sam Wormley
  • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, oriel36
    • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, Shawn
    • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, SkySea
      • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, oriel36
    • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, Hilton Evans
  • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, Rich
    • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, carsten_niel
    • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, carsten_niel
• Royal Rangers, Starlord
  • Re: Royal Rangers, dsmalln
    • Re: Royal Rangers, Wayne Howell
      • Re: Royal Rangers, Starlord
• How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, meara . london
  • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, Sailing Away
  • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, George
    • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, Larry Stedman
  • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, john carruthers
  • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, wsnell01
    • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, Gil
      • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, meara . london
  • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, nytecam
• Re: ANNUAL DR. VELIKOVSKY HALLOWEEN SEANCE.., Marty
• When is the Leonid peak ?, Craig
  • Re: When is the Leonid peak ?, RAMangold
  • Re: When is the Leonid peak ?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: When is the Leonid peak ?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: When is the Leonid peak ?, canopus56
    • Re: When is the Leonid peak ?, canopus56
• canon 300d IR?, starburst
  • Re: canon 300d IR?, George
    • Re: canon 300d IR?, starburst
      • Re: canon 300d IR?, George
  • Re: canon 300d IR?, Kukuriku
• Neptune + Triton pic via DSLR, nytecam
  • Re: Neptune + Triton pic via DSLR, George
• Space Weather News for Nov. 16, 2005, Sam Wormley
• Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, nytecam
  • Re: Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, John Sheff
  • Re: Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, nytecam
      • Re: Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, Per Erik Jorde
    • Re: Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, David Nakamoto
• Speaking of Copernicus, He's Been Found, Davoud
• Waterproof EPs?, darin
  • Re: Waterproof EPs?, Larry Stedman
    • Re: Waterproof EPs?, darin
      • Re: Waterproof EPs?, Larry Stedman
• At Last!, Starlord
  • Re: At Last!, Jim
  • Re: At Last!, RMOLLISE
    • Re: At Last!, Starlord
• Outside OTA diameter of 114mm Newt, genedigennaro
  • Re: Outside OTA diameter of 114mm Newt, George
    • Re: Outside OTA diameter of 114mm Newt, Roger Hamlett
  • Re: Outside OTA diameter of 114mm Newt, Martin R. Howell
• Free web-based Asteroid hunting Seminar - Saturday 11-19-05, newbinaries
• Current sky simulator similar to the old PC Sky?, Stephen M. Zumbo
  • Re: Current sky simulator similar to the old PC Sky?, MitchAlsup
  • Re: Current sky simulator similar to the old PC Sky?, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Current sky simulator similar to the old PC Sky?, Stephen M. Zumbo
  • Re: Current sky simulator similar to the old PC Sky?, Esmail Bonakdarian
• Canon Rebel to a Televue 76, Stan Dornfeld
  • Re: Canon Rebel to a Televue 76, tmbMike
  • Re: Canon Rebel to a Televue 76, Kukuriku
• Something weird about DSLRs..., Rich
  • Re: Something weird about DSLRs..., Chris L Peterson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Something weird about DSLRs..., Rob Johnson
    • Re: Something weird about DSLRs..., Rich
      • Re: Something weird about DSLRs..., Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Something weird about DSLRs..., MitchAlsup
• imperfect moon, nytecam
  • Re: imperfect moon, JESSIE MURRAY
    • Re: imperfect moon, nytecam
• Update my page on high-resolution, Giorgio Mengoli
  • Re: Update my page on high-resolution, md
    • Re: Update my page on high-resolution, Giorgio Mengoli
  • Re: Update my page on high-resolution, Davoud
• Mars @ 92x, Ioannis
  • Re: Mars @ 92x, Ioannis
  • Re: Mars @ 92x, john carruthers
• continued ep ignorance, part deux, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, john carruthers
    • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Jay Swartzfeger
    • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Harry F . Leopold