Re: Observing on the move
- From: "atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx" <atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Nov 2005 23:41:26 -0800
Stephen Paul wrote:
....
>
> I know little of photometry,
And it shows.
>but if stars and portability were primary
> concerns, then I'd be thinking 4" F9 ED doublet ($$), or 4" F6 apo triplet
> ($$$$) refractor. These have comparatively zero cooldown time, and are
> pretty much dew proof for hours and hours.
Aperture photometry is all but impervious to cool down issues but the
heck of sensitive to aperture, which is vastly much larger for a 8"
SCT. As for refractor being dew proof for hours to no end; just don't
be ridiculous.
Andrea T.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Observing on the move
- From: Stephen Paul
- Re: Observing on the move
- From: Martin R. Howell
- Re: Observing on the move
- References:
- Observing on the move
- From: Zinc Potterman
- Re: Observing on the move
- From: Stephen Paul
- Observing on the move
- Prev by Date: Re: Behold! Meade Truss-DOB's are coming!
- Next by Date: Re: Observing on the move
- Previous by thread: Re: Observing on the move
- Next by thread: Re: Observing on the move
- Index(es):