Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:05:04 GMT, "Ed T" <reply@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>That was my point. If you don't see the change in psychology as damaging,
>it becomes mundane, perhaps developmental. It's in the eye of the
>beholder.

However, in my case, I did not mean simply "altered", but "altered in a
negative way". That is, I meant damaged: a component of the psyche that
can lead to personal harm or harm to others, or that can make the victim
dangerous. I wasn't talking about generic changes- obviously, we all
change from moment to moment, and we can occasionally experience large
changes- something that can either be positive or negative.

_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
.

Quantcast