sci.astro.amateur

• Date Index

---

• Meteor in Kent, UK?, Vernon
• Advice on photo stacking, gingerdazza
• Newbie Celestron StarHopper Assistance, Snowman
• Newbie Question, wbtancer
  • Re: Newbie Question, Brian Tung
    • Re: Newbie Question, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Newbie Question, Chris L Peterson
• starter scope - reducing options, J Lunis
  • Re: starter scope - reducing options, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: starter scope - reducing options, Doink
      • Re: starter scope - reducing options, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Re: starter scope - reducing options, Stephen Paul
• When computer geeks start defining time, Tim Killian
  • Re: When computer geeks start defining time, Brian Tung
    • Re: When computer geeks start defining time, George
  • Re: When computer geeks start defining time, Skywise
  • Re: When computer geeks start defining time, Eric
    • Re: When computer geeks start defining time, Skywise
• Re: Gravity pobe B papers ?, oriel36
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gravity pobe B papers ?, Sam Wormley
• Light Polution Filter / Photography question...., Sailing Away
• If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., Arnold
  • Re: If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., Davoud
  • Re: If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., Sam Wormley
  • Re: If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., Bert Hyman
    • Re: If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., Joe S.
    • Re: If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., john carruthers
  • Re: If you believe any of your theories, you've turned science into a religion., Joe S.
• Re: science sense and common sense, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Stuart Levy
  • Re: science sense and common sense, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Robert Grumbine
• Re: Can a gamma ray burst make me blind ???, Skywise
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can a gamma ray burst make me blind ???, Skywise
    • Re: Can a gamma ray burst make me blind ???, George
  • Re: Can a gamma ray burst make me blind ???, Eric
    • Re: Can a gamma ray burst make me blind ???, George
• Making a homemade focal reducer, tedkord
  • Re: Making a homemade focal reducer, Roger Hamlett
    • Re: Making a homemade focal reducer, tedkord
• Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, Glenn Holliday
  • Re: Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, trosenfeld
    • Re: Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, Glenn Holliday
  • Re: Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, David G. Nagel
      • Re: Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Solar guidelines in Boy Scout Astronomy merit badge, Glenn Holliday
• Dead Time in Rosamond, Starlord
  • Re: Dead Time in Rosamond, Stuart Chapman
    • Re: Dead Time in Rosamond, Starlord
  • Re: Dead Time in Rosamond, Tom
    • Re: Dead Time in Rosamond, Starlord
      • Re: Dead Time in Rosamond, Mike Simmons
• New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, John Banister
  • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, Starlord
    • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, John Banister
      • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, Starlord
      • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, Craig M . Bobchin
  • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, john carruthers
    • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, John Banister
      • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, rat ~( );>
    • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, g626700-groups
      • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, Shawn
      • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, urban astronomer
      • Re: New Guy Questions; Opinions wanted, Shawn
• Good starting telescope and book for child, lifeisgood
  • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Brian Tung
  • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, g626700-groups
  • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Robert Grumbine
  • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Doink
    • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Jan Owen
      • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Doink
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, FSaxwas9
      • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, Starlord
    • Re: Good starting telescope and book for child, g626700-groups
• Vatican astronomer: Science and faith do not contradict, Hilton Evans
• meade ds 90, cavalier1968
• Software advice for stacking photos, gingerdazza
  • Re: Software advice for stacking photos, Beta Persei
    • Re: Software advice for stacking photos, William C. Keel
  • Re: Software advice for stacking photos, David Nakamoto
• Re: Philips tricked me!!, Sailing Away
• intro help, bobby . kasthuri
  • Re: intro help, Starlord
  • Re: intro help, Mean Mr Mustard
  • Re: intro help, Jay Swartzfeger
• zhummel dobs, hansolo
  • Re: zhummel dobs, Doink
    • Re: zhummel dobs, Ernie Dunbar
      • Re: zhummel dobs, Doink
      • Re: zhummel dobs, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: zhummel dobs, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: zhummel dobs, Florian
      • Re: zhummel dobs, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: zhummel dobs, Doink
    • Re: zhummel dobs, Ernie Dunbar
      • Re: zhummel dobs, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: zhummel dobs, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: zhummel dobs, Mark
• webcam recommendations for astrophotography?, Eric
  • Re: webcam recommendations for astrophotography?, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: webcam recommendations for astrophotography?, Eric
    • Re: webcam recommendations for astrophotography?, Uncle Bob
  • Re: webcam recommendations for astrophotography?, David Nakamoto
    • Re: webcam recommendations for astrophotography?, Eric
• [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Florian
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Alson Wong
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, George
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Florian
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, George
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Florian
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, George
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Florian
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, William Hamblen
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, John Shakespeare
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, G.T.
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Alson Wong
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Sailing Away
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, George
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Sailing Away
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, john carruthers
      • Re: Where is M13?, Tom Polakis
      • Re: Where is M13?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Where is M13?, John Shakespeare
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Doink
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Jay Swartzfeger
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
  • Re: Where is M13?, canopus56
  • Re: Where is M13?, canopus56
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Paul Schlyter
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Robin Leadbeater
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Harry F . Leopold
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Starlord
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
    • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, john carruthers
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Bill Tschumy
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, David G. Nagel
      • Re: [ANN] Where is M13?, Florian
• Planetarium Software, Kevin
  • Re: Planetarium Software, Brian Tung
  • Re:Astro: Planetarium Software, Sjouke Burry
• Why .avi format ?, Tom Rauschenbach
  • Re: Why .avi format ?, Michael McCulloch
    • Re: Why .avi format ?, Carsten A. Arnholm
  • Re: Why .avi format ?, Davoud
    • Re: Why .avi format ?, Tom Rauschenbach
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, Davoud
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, Chuck Taylor
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Why .avi format ?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why .avi format ?, William Hamblen
  • Re: Why .avi format ?, David Nakamoto
• "Telescope" problem same in camera world, Rich
  • Re: "Telescope" problem same in camera world, G.T.
    • Re: "Telescope" problem same in camera world, Rich
  • Re: "Telescope" problem same in camera world, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: "Telescope" problem same in camera world, David Nakamoto
• opinions/experience with Orion short-tube 4.5" reflector, FSaxwas9
  • Re: opinions/experience with Orion short-tube 4.5" reflector, FSaxwas9
• M31 at last, Pete Lawrence
  • Re: M31 at last, David Nakamoto
    • Re: M31 at last, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: M31 at last, George
    • Re: M31 at last, Pete Lawrence
      • Re: M31 at last, George
      • Re: M31 at last, Rich
      • Re: M31 at last, George
  • Re: M31 at last, Tom Randy
  • Re: M31 at last, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: M31 at last, pete lawrence
      • Re: M31 at last, G.T.
      • Re: M31 at last, Pete Lawrence
  • Re: M31 at last, Arnie
    • Re: M31 at last, pete lawrence
    • Re: M31 at last, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: M31 at last, caryrjr
• new telrad finder charts, nigel_sampson70
  • Re: new telrad finder charts, Doink
• On top/bottom posting... definitely OFF TOPIC (LONG), Larry Stedman
  • Re: On top/bottom posting... definitely OFF TOPIC (LONG), per.corell@xxxxxxxxx
• Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, william . lugg
  • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, tkuniok
    • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, Stephen Paul
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, william . lugg
    • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis drives, David Nakamoto
  • Single Axis vs. Dual Axis Drives, william . lugg
    • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis Drives, Bill Becker
    • Re: Single Axis vs. Dual Axis Drives, Chuck Taylor
• two quick questions, Jason Watters
  • Re: two quick questions, Sam Wormley
    • Re: two quick questions, oriel36
  • Re: two quick questions, oriel36
  • Re: two quick questions, canopus56
    • Re: two quick questions, oriel36
• Google Groups Problem?, RAMangold
• C-8 and 2-inch eyepieces?, George Normandin
  • Re: C-8 and 2-inch eyepieces?, Stephen Paul
    • Re: C-8 and 2-inch eyepieces?, Ol' Duffer
  • Re: C-8 and 2-inch eyepieces?, William Hamblen
    • Re: C-8 and 2-inch eyepieces?, Rich
  • Re: C-8 and 2-inch eyepieces?, Scott Smith
• Wood legs and cold temps...., Stephen Paul
  • Re: Wood legs and cold temps...., George
  • Re: Wood legs and cold temps...., Shawn
• FAQ and cold weather gear, Tom Rauschenbach
  • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, Starlord
  • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, Stephen Paul
  • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, George Normandin
  • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, john carruthers
    • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, George Normandin
      • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, Starlord
      • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, Tom Rauschenbach
      • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, George Normandin
  • Re: FAQ and cold weather gear, Andy Blackburn
• Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, George Normandin
    • Re: Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, George Normandin
  • Re: Seek Advice: What filters make sense for color CCD imagers like SBIG ST-10XME, Alson Wong
• Making a telescope, callisto
  • Re: Making a telescope, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Making a telescope, Starlord
  • Re: Making a telescope, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: Making a telescope, George Hein
  • Re: Making a telescope, rcyoung
    • Re: Making a telescope, Jan Owen
      • Re: Making a telescope, Howard Lester
  • Re: Making a telescope, Bob May
    • Re: Making a telescope, callisto
  • Re: Making a telescope, Jan Owen
  • Re: Making a telescope, john carruthers
  • Re: Making a telescope, Roger Hamlett
    • Re: Making a telescope, George Hein
      • Re: Making a telescope, rcyoung
  • Re: Making a telescope, jeff
• Hubbell Barnyard Sky Caps For Sale--Light Polluction Reduction, W. Watson
  • Re: Hubbell Barnyard Sky Caps For Sale--Light Polluction Reduction, blart
• buying used>?, FSaxwas9
  • Re: buying used>?, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: buying used>?, Starlord
  • Re: buying used>?, Stephen Paul
• solar prom activity, nytecam
• Feedback on Antares Refractors?, daveponder
  • Re: Feedback on Antares Refractors?, smsastro
    • Re: Feedback on Antares Refractors?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Feedback on Antares Refractors?, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Feedback on Antares Refractors?, Doink
  • Re: Feedback on Antares Refractors?, laura halliday
• Off-topic question, Joe S.
  • Re: Off-topic question, Starlord
• Setup for DSO hunter, Ioannis
  • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Florian
    • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Ioannis
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Tom Rauschenbach
  • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Martin R. Howell
    • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Ioannis
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Ioannis
  • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, elaich
    • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Ioannis
    • Re: Setup for DSO hunter (top posting), Roger Steer
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter (top posting), Brian Tung
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter (top posting), Ioannis
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter (top posting), G.T.
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter (top posting), Tom Rauschenbach
      • Re: Setup for DSO hunter (top posting), Larry Stedman
  • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Arnold
    • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, Ioannis
  • Re: Setup for DSO hunter, elaich
• Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, laura halliday
  • Re: Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, Phil Wheeler
    • Message not available
      • Re: Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, Joe
  • Re: Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, Howard Lester
  • Re: Solar eclipse: 29 March 2006, Mark Gingrich
• Orion XT maillist?, Dan Wenz
  • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Dan Wenz
  • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Joe S.
    • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Dan Wenz
      • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Starlord
  • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Starlord
    • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Starlord
      • Re: Orion XT maillist?, Phil Wheeler
• APML?, J McBride
• Re: which telescope to buy???, RMOLLISE
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: which telescope to buy???, RMOLLISE
  • Re: which telescope to buy???, Starlord
  • Re: which telescope to buy???, Uncle Bob
    • Re: which telescope to buy???, Stephen Paul
      • Re: which telescope to buy???, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: which telescope to buy???, Stephen Paul
      • Re: which telescope to buy???, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: which telescope to buy???, Uncle Bob
• Collimation?, bolt thrower
  • Re: Collimation?, Doink
  • Re: Collimation?, Chuck Taylor
    • Re: Collimation?, Jan Owen
  • Re: Collimation?, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Collimation?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Collimation?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Collimation?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Collimation?, Doink
  • Re: Collimation?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Collimation?, Uncle Bob
    • Re: Collimation?, Starlord
  • Re: Collimation?, canopus56
    • Re: Collimation?, Chuck Taylor
• NexStar 8i help please, Joe
  • Re: NexStar 8i help please, RMOLLISE
    • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Joe
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Wade A. Hilmo
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Joe
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Wade A. Hilmo
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, daveponder
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Joe
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Robert Sheaffer
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, RMOLLISE
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, RMOLLISE
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Joe
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, jsavard
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, RMOLLISE
      • Re: NexStar 8i help please, Joe
• Orion "AccuFocus", RAMangold
  • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", Shawn
    • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", RAMangold
      • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", Doink
      • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", RAMangold
      • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", George
      • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", RAMangold
      • Re: Orion "AccuFocus", Phil Wheeler
• Opinions on Orion Astroview 120 ST, Rob
  • Re: Opinions on Orion Astroview 120 ST, Doink
    • Re: Opinions on Orion Astroview 120 ST, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Opinions on Orion Astroview 120 ST, Doink
  • Re: Opinions on Orion Astroview 120 ST, bob
  • Re: Opinions on Orion Astroview 120 ST, RMOLLISE
• GM8 Question..., Doink
  • Re: GM8 Question..., Stephen Paul
    • Re: GM8 Question..., Doink
  • Re: GM8 Question..., Steve Sherman
    • Re: GM8 Question..., Coppy Littlehouse
  • Re: GM8 Question..., Mark D
    • Re: GM8 Question..., Mij Adyaw
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Doink
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Stephen Paul
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Coppy Littlehouse
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Mij Adyaw
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Coppy Littlehouse
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Steve Sherman
  • Re: GM8 Question..., Uncle Bob
    • Re: GM8 Question..., Doink
      • Re: GM8 Question..., Steve Sherman
• Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), callisto
  • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), tony_flanders
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), CNJ999
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Sam Wormley
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), CNJ999
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Sam Wormley
  • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Joe S.
    • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Doink
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), Coppy Littlehouse
      • Re: Equivalent scopes (or binocs) to match Messier telescope(s), urban astronomer
• Japanese probe - Hayabusa had touched down on asteroid itokawa afterall, jhaveri_alay
• Space X News, Starlord
• konus 500 short tube reflector, hansolo
  • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, George
    • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, Doink
      • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, Jan Owen
      • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, Doink
      • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, Jan Owen
  • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, hansolo
    • Re: konus 500 short tube reflector, Jan Owen
• Re: Criterion Dynamax 8 help, offshore79
  • Re: Criterion Dynamax 8 help, Gil
• Universal Astronomics MicroStar, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Universal Astronomics MicroStar, Doink
    • Re: Universal Astronomics MicroStar, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Universal Astronomics MicroStar, tony_flanders
    • Re: Universal Astronomics MicroStar, Stephen Paul
• William Optics / Burgess Binoviewer, Paul Murphy
  • Re: William Optics / Burgess Binoviewer, George Hein
    • Re: William Optics / Burgess Binoviewer, RMOLLISE
    • Re: William Optics / Burgess Binoviewer, Stephen Paul
• Mnemonic for the galactic equator constellations?, canopus56
  • Re: Mnemonic for the galactic equator constellations?, callisto
    • Re: Mnemonic for the galactic equator constellations?, canopus56
• Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, canopus56
  • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, canopus56
  • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Tom Polakis
    • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Bryan Putnam
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Brian Tung
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Harry F . Leopold
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Brian Tung
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Harry F . Leopold
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Harry F . Leopold
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, canopus56
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, canopus56
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Bryan Putnam
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Brian Tung
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Bryan Putnam
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Brian Tung
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, canopus56
    • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Brian Tung
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, Tom Polakis
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, SkySea
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the celestial equator constellations, John Savard
• Re: Happy Birthday Jesus!, Vernon
• XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Kwai Chang Caine
  • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Phil
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), g626700-groups
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Kevin
  • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Ed B.
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Dennis Woos
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), tony_flanders
  • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Wade A. Hilmo
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Starlord
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Mij Adyaw
  • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Kwai Chang Caine
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Starlord
    • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Wade A. Hilmo
      • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Kwai Chang Caine
      • Re: XT4.5 vs. XT6 for a 5-year old (and dad), Phil Wheeler
• Another relativity thought..., Doink
  • Re: Another relativity thought..., Davoud
  • Re: Another relativity thought..., Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Another relativity thought..., Robert Grumbine
      • Re: Another relativity thought..., Dan Wenz
• XT-10 vs XT-12, Joe S.
  • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Jan Owen
    • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, fcathell
  • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Shawn
  • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Stephen Paul
    • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, g626700-groups
      • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Gaz
  • Re: XT-10 vs XT-12, Michael McCulloch
• Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, canopus56
  • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, md
    • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, canopus56
  • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, Brian Tung
  • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, allisonki
    • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, canopus56
    • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, canopus56
  • Message not available
    • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, canopus56
  • Re: Menomic for remembering the progression of the zodiac constellations, Alan Baxter
• Some advice needed for newcomer, gingerdazza
  • Re: Some advice needed for newcomer, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Some advice needed for newcomer, Doink
      • Re: Some advice needed for newcomer, gingerdazza
      • Re: Some advice needed for newcomer, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Some advice needed for newcomer, nytecam
• blue mars ?, James Vincent
  • Re: blue mars ?, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: blue mars ?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: blue mars ?, Joe S.
• spectral hotspot in Cygnus, nytecam
• want to go to Kitt Peak for imaging? (December 7th), pslipscomb
• GOOGLE SKY, Anibalito
  • Re: GOOGLE SKY, RMOLLISE
    • Re: GOOGLE SKY, William C. Keel
  • Re: GOOGLE SKY, urban astronomer
  • Re: GOOGLE SKY, Tom Polakis
• Strange event, Starlord
  • Re: Strange event, avivancom
    • Re: Strange event, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Strange event, Starlord
      • Re: Strange event, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: Strange event, Joe S.
    • Re: Strange event, Buzzygirl
      • Re: Strange event, john carruthers
• Converting Hyperleda galaxy dimensions to arcmins? How to, canopus56
  • Re: Converting Hyperleda galaxy dimensions to arcmins? How to, William C. Keel
    • Re: Converting Hyperleda galaxy dimensions to arcmins? How to, canopus56
    • Re: Converting Hyperleda galaxy dimensions to arcmins? How to, canopus56
• Weird passage in a book, Rich
  • Re: Weird passage in a book, Algomeysa2
    • Re: Weird passage in a book, james
    • Re: Weird passage in a book, John Savard
• Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), PD
• science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
  • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
    • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Paul Schlyter
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), John Savard
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Stephen Paul
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), mrgrytt
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Mij Adyaw
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), smarshallpaul
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Stephen Paul
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Mij Adyaw
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Martin Brown
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Martin Brown
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Davoud
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Shawn
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, John Savard
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, jsavard
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Martin Brown
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, John Savard
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, WinField
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, WinField
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Robert Grumbine
  • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Ed T
    • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms (was: South Park taunting Scientology), Brian Tung
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Ed T
      • Re: science and religion, was Re: Intelligent Design Invading Liberal Classrooms, Chris L Peterson
• Arp Peculiar Galaxy Catalogue too faint for amateurs?, canopus56
  • Re: Arp Peculiar Galaxy Catalogue too faint for amateurs?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Arp Peculiar Galaxy Catalogue too faint for amateurs?, Brian Tung
    • Re: Arp Peculiar Galaxy Catalogue too faint for amateurs?, canopus56
  • Re: Arp Peculiar Galaxy Catalogue too faint for amateurs?, David Nakamoto
• Webcam questions, Skywise
  • Re: Webcam questions, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Webcam questions, Skywise
      • Re: Webcam questions, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Webcam questions, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Webcam questions, Skywise
  • Re: Webcam questions, Robin Leadbeater
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Webcam questions, Davoud
• ep on astromart question, Jay Swartzfeger
• A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Shneor
  • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, G.T.
  • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Bert Hyman
    • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Bert Hyman
  • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Tim Killian
  • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, canopus56
    • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, Coppy Littlehouse
  • Re: A CALL TO ACTION - OR LOSE YOUR OBSERVING SITE FOREVER, FOXZ News Gored
• A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Larry Stedman
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Jan Owen
  • Perhaps not, was Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Brian Tung
    • Re: Perhaps not, was Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Shawn
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Shawn
    • Message not available
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Chris.B
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, elaich
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Hilton Evans
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Joe S.
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Shawn
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Martin R. Howell
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Tom Hise
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, elaich
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Tom Hise
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Mike Simmons
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Brian Tung
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Mike Simmons
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Tom Hise
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Shawn
      • Thanks for responses! A reply... (LONG without quotes), Larry Stedman
      • Re: Thanks for responses! A reply... (LONG without quotes), Starlord
      • Re: Thanks for responses! A reply... (LONG without quotes), Shawn
      • Re: Thanks for responses! A reply... (LONG without quotes), G.T.
      • Re: Thanks for responses! A reply... (LONG without quotes), Ed
  • Message not available
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Ed T
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, thad
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Chuck Taylor
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, RMOLLISE
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, RMOLLISE
    • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Brian Tung
      • Re: A suggestion for responding to posts on s.a.a.... please put the quotes at the bottom!, Brian Tung
• Venus casts a shadow..., Pete Lawrence
  • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Mark Gingrich
    • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Pete Lawrence
  • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Pete Lawrence
      • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Shawn
  • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Les Blalock
  • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., nytecam
    • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Pete Lawrence
    • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., nytecam
      • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., Pete Lawrence
  • Re: Venus casts a shadow..., G.T.
• Re: Bushnell® Voyager Reflector Telescope at Costco online store, zgseronik
• Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Adrian
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, wsnell01
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, jsavard
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Adrian
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Bob May
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, wsnell01
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Ed T
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, canopus56
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, zgseronik
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, wsnell01
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, jsavard
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, jeff
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Roger Hamlett
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Gil
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Tom Rauschenbach
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, richard schumacher
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, wsnell01
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, richard schumacher
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, wsnell01
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, richard schumacher
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, wsnell01
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Tim Killian
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, offaxis2
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Adrian
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Cutshot
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, decaf
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Cutshot
    • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, rat ~( );>
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, cutshot
      • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, cutshot
  • Re: Why so few amateur off-axis telescopes?, tedkord
• Old Scope New Life, Starlord
  • Re: Old Scope New Life, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Old Scope New Life, Howard Lester
    • Re: Old Scope New Life, Starlord
      • Re: Old Scope New Life, Doink
• Meade DSI software and controlling an Orion Atlas EQ-GT mount, canopus56
  • Re: Meade DSI software and controlling an Orion Atlas EQ-GT mount, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Meade DSI software and controlling an Orion Atlas EQ-GT mount, canopus56
      • Re: Meade DSI software and controlling an Orion Atlas EQ-GT mount, canopus56
• adapting orion intelliscope to other models?, kkduda
  • Re: adapting orion intelliscope to other models?, Phil Wheeler
• Venus 'under attacK' in dusk sky, nytecam
  • Re: Venus 'under attacK' in dusk sky, Rich
    • Re: Venus 'under attacK' in dusk sky, nytecam
      • Re: Venus 'under attacK' in dusk sky, G.T.
  • Re: Venus 'under attacK' in dusk sky, Florian
• suggestion for upgrading Celeston Super C8 plus, tlrouse
  • Re: suggestion for upgrading Celeston Super C8 plus, William Hamblen
    • Re: suggestion for upgrading Celeston Super C8 plus, RMOLLISE
• solar flare on east limb, nytecam
  • Re: solar flare on east limb, Doink
    • Message not available
      • Re: solar flare on east limb, nytecam
• Cassini gets the skinny on Saturn's rings, Sam Wormley
• Quaoar: Is it 2002 LM 60 or AW 197?, Scott Robert Ladd
  • Re: Quaoar: Is it 2002 LM 60 or AW 197?, Sam Wormley
• achromats needed for H-alpha light?, nytecam
  • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, William Hamblen
  • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Rich
      • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Rich
      • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Mark Gingrich
      • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Brian Tung
  • Re: achromats needed for H-alpha light?, Phil Wheeler
• stupidity and astronomy don't mix, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: stupidity and astronomy don't mix, Andrew Nicolle
    • Re: stupidity and astronomy don't mix, Jay Swartzfeger
    • Re: stupidity and astronomy don't mix, Joe S.
      • Re: stupidity and astronomy don't mix, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: stupidity and astronomy don't mix, Jan Owen
• 5x antares barlow, Max
  • Re: 5x antares barlow, JD
    • Re: 5x antares barlow, Hilton Evans
  • Re: 5x antares barlow, Hilton Evans
• Short night, Starlord
  • Re: Short night, Harry F . Leopold
    • Re: Short night, Starlord
      • Re: Short night, Harry F . Leopold
• Einstien, Mark F.
  • Re: Einstien, Hilton Evans
  • Re: Einstien, Brian Tung
  • Re: Einstien, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Einstien, oriel36
  • Re: Einstien, Llanzlan Klazmon
• two blue planets after dusk, nytecam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • two blue planets after dusk, nytecam
    • Re: two blue planets after dusk, Pierre
      • Re: two blue planets after dusk, nytecam
• How do you help astronomy?, sunwolf
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Starlord
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Bill Owen
    • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Martin Brown
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Martin Brown
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, lputerbaugh
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Davoud
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Buzzygirl
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Bob Schmall
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, Steven Van Impe
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, oriel36
  • Re: How do you help astronomy?, sunwolf
• "stone thrown west goes further", nytecam
  • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Joško Šugar
  • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Sailing Away
  • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Sam Wormley
    • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Sailing Away
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Sam Wormley
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Chris L Peterson
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Brian Tung
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Brian Tung
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Chris L Peterson
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Brian Tung
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", SkySea
  • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", lal_truckee
    • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Doink
      • Re: "stone thrown west goes further", Marty
• Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, boofreak
  • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, tony_flanders
  • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Jay Swartzfeger
      • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, John Nichols
      • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Daniel A. Mitchell
      • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, tony_flanders
      • Message not available
      • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Jay Swartzfeger
      • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, wsnell01
      • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Roger Hamlett
  • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, Starlord
  • Re: Full/near-full moon and Telrad, John Nichols
• Deepsky Astronomy Software - Fundraiser for your club, Steven S Tuma
• celestron nexstar 8i or C10 NGT, meercat19
  • Re: celestron nexstar 8i or C10 NGT, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: celestron nexstar 8i or C10 NGT, Sailing Away
  • Re: celestron nexstar 8i or C10 NGT, RMOLLISE
  • Re: celestron nexstar 8i or C10 NGT, Stephen Paul
    • Re: celestron nexstar 8i or C10 NGT, RMOLLISE
• Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death (was: Will Rome Return? ), G.T.
  • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death (was: Will Rome Return? ), Florian
  • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death, Starlord
  • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death (was: Will Rome Return? ), Doink
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death (was: Will Rome Return? ), Brian Tung
    • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death (was: Will Rome Return? ), decaf
  • Re: Atheist-agnostics ignorant about life & death (was: Will Rome Return? ), Brian Tung
• Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, stlham59
  • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, Tom Rauschenbach
    • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, stlham59
      • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, tony_flanders
      • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, stlham59
  • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, tony_flanders
    • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, stlham59
      • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, tony_flanders
  • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, Ernie Wright
  • Re: Simple Astronomical Seek & Find, Brian Tung
• Mt.Wilson, Mark F.
  • Re: Mt.Wilson, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Mt.Wilson, G.T.
  • Re: Mt.Wilson, tkuniok
    • Re: Mt.Wilson, Starlord
  • Re: Mt.Wilson, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Mt.Wilson, Coppy Littlehouse
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Matthew Ota
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Brian Tung
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Gobbletwo
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Matthew Ota
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Mike Simmons
    • Re: Mt.Wilson, Gobbletwo
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Starlord
  • Re: Mt.Wilson, Mike Simmons
    • Re: Mt.Wilson, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Starlord
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Mike Simmons
      • Re: Mt.Wilson, Mike Simmons
• Help With alt.binaries.pictures.astro, RAMangold
  • Re: Help With alt.binaries.pictures.astro, George
    • Re: Help With alt.binaries.pictures.astro, Terry Bohlsen
      • Re: Help With alt.binaries.pictures.astro, RAMangold
      • Re: Help With alt.binaries.pictures.astro, George
      • Message not available
      • Re: Help With alt.binaries.pictures.astro, George Normandin
• LEON-IDS (Shooting Stars ) are Coming !, jhaveri_alay
• clock driven equatorial mount., Zinc Potterman
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Tim Killian
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Sam Wormley
    • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Sam Wormley
    • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Tim Killian
    • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Phil Wheeler
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., RMOLLISE
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Roger Hamlett
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., laura halliday
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Phil Wheeler
    • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., David Nakamoto
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., Martin Brown
  • Re: clock driven equatorial mount., nytecam
• When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, Sam Wormley
  • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, Sam Wormley
  • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, oriel36
    • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, Shawn
    • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, SkySea
      • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, oriel36
    • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, Hilton Evans
  • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, Rich
    • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, carsten_niel
    • Re: When the sun goes down tonight, step outside and look Venus and Nunki, carsten_niel
• Royal Rangers, Starlord
  • Re: Royal Rangers, dsmalln
    • Re: Royal Rangers, Wayne Howell
      • Re: Royal Rangers, Starlord
• How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, meara . london
  • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, Sailing Away
  • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, George
    • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, Larry Stedman
  • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, john carruthers
  • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, wsnell01
    • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, Gil
      • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, meara . london
  • Re: How to Dobsonian-ize an equatorial scope?, nytecam
• Re: ANNUAL DR. VELIKOVSKY HALLOWEEN SEANCE.., Marty
• When is the Leonid peak ?, Craig
  • Re: When is the Leonid peak ?, RAMangold
  • Re: When is the Leonid peak ?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: When is the Leonid peak ?, Stephen Paul
  • Re: When is the Leonid peak ?, canopus56
    • Re: When is the Leonid peak ?, canopus56
• canon 300d IR?, starburst
  • Re: canon 300d IR?, George
    • Re: canon 300d IR?, starburst
      • Re: canon 300d IR?, George
  • Re: canon 300d IR?, Kukuriku
• Neptune + Triton pic via DSLR, nytecam
  • Re: Neptune + Triton pic via DSLR, George
• Space Weather News for Nov. 16, 2005, Sam Wormley
• Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, nytecam
  • Re: Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, John Sheff
  • Re: Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, nytecam
      • Re: Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, Per Erik Jorde
    • Re: Uranus pic but help neededidentifying sats, David Nakamoto
• Speaking of Copernicus, He's Been Found, Davoud
• Waterproof EPs?, darin
  • Re: Waterproof EPs?, Larry Stedman
    • Re: Waterproof EPs?, darin
      • Re: Waterproof EPs?, Larry Stedman
• At Last!, Starlord
  • Re: At Last!, Jim
  • Re: At Last!, RMOLLISE
    • Re: At Last!, Starlord
• Outside OTA diameter of 114mm Newt, genedigennaro
  • Re: Outside OTA diameter of 114mm Newt, George
    • Re: Outside OTA diameter of 114mm Newt, Roger Hamlett
  • Re: Outside OTA diameter of 114mm Newt, Martin R. Howell
• Free web-based Asteroid hunting Seminar - Saturday 11-19-05, newbinaries
• Current sky simulator similar to the old PC Sky?, Stephen M. Zumbo
  • Re: Current sky simulator similar to the old PC Sky?, MitchAlsup
  • Re: Current sky simulator similar to the old PC Sky?, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Current sky simulator similar to the old PC Sky?, Stephen M. Zumbo
  • Re: Current sky simulator similar to the old PC Sky?, Esmail Bonakdarian
• Canon Rebel to a Televue 76, Stan Dornfeld
  • Re: Canon Rebel to a Televue 76, tmbMike
  • Re: Canon Rebel to a Televue 76, Kukuriku
• Something weird about DSLRs..., Rich
  • Re: Something weird about DSLRs..., Chris L Peterson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Something weird about DSLRs..., Rob Johnson
    • Re: Something weird about DSLRs..., Rich
      • Re: Something weird about DSLRs..., Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Something weird about DSLRs..., MitchAlsup
• imperfect moon, nytecam
  • Re: imperfect moon, JESSIE MURRAY
    • Re: imperfect moon, nytecam
• Update my page on high-resolution, Giorgio Mengoli
  • Re: Update my page on high-resolution, md
    • Re: Update my page on high-resolution, Giorgio Mengoli
  • Re: Update my page on high-resolution, Davoud
• Mars @ 92x, Ioannis
  • Re: Mars @ 92x, Ioannis
  • Re: Mars @ 92x, john carruthers
• continued ep ignorance, part deux, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, john carruthers
    • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Jay Swartzfeger
    • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Harry F . Leopold
  • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Jan Owen
    • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Jay Swartzfeger
      • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Martin Brown
    • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, g626700-groups
      • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Jay Swartzfeger
      • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Mark D
      • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Brian Tung
      • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Mark D
      • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, g626700-groups
      • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Mark S. Holden
      • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Mark D
      • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Rich
  • Re: continued ep ignorance, part deux, Rich
• Takahashi LE or...(eyepiece advice), Gregory
  • Message not available
    • Re: Takahashi LE or...(eyepiece advice), PR Hobson
• Notturni.it: a new NightScapes Astrophotography site!, Gianluca Li Causi
• The Astronomer's Messier Journal, eflaspo
• Orion Electronic Imaging Eyepiece, Gary
  • Re: Orion Electronic Imaging Eyepiece, Doink
• Gas Giants Return..., Uncle Bob
  • Re: Gas Giants Return..., Rich
    • Re: Gas Giants Return..., Cousin Ricky
    • Re: Gas Giants Return..., Jay Swartzfeger
• Collimating a Meade 8 inch SCT, Tom Rauschenbach
  • Re: Collimating a Meade 8 inch SCT, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Collimating a Meade 8 inch SCT, Mark D
    • Re: Collimating a Meade 8 inch SCT, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Collimating a Meade 8 inch SCT, dkelvey
      • Re: Collimating a Meade 8 inch SCT, Mark D
      • Re: Collimating a Meade 8 inch SCT, Jan Owen
      • Re: Collimating a Meade 8 inch SCT, Mark D
      • Re: Collimating a Meade 8 inch SCT, dkelvey
    • Re: Collimating a Meade 8 inch SCT, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Collimating a Meade 8 inch SCT, Shawn
• heat haze, blart
  • Re: heat haze, RMOLLISE
    • Re: heat haze, Mark F.
      • Re: heat haze, RMOLLISE
      • Re: heat haze, blart
    • Re: heat haze, blart
• Re: Motor Drives on a Polaris Mount, RMOLLISE
• Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, Davoud
  • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, jimandlaura26
    • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, Buzzygirl
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, Tim Killian
    • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, RAMangold
  • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, Mark D
  • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, blart
    • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, Shawn
      • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, blart
  • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, Jan Owen
    • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, bolt thrower
      • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, Richard F.L.R.Snashall
      • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, thad
      • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, Robert Sheaffer
      • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, Richard F.L.R.Snashall
      • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, katrinaxx
      • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, blart
      • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, G.T.
      • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, blart
  • Re: Terrestrial/Astronomical scope?, blart
• SCT design, tedkord
  • Re: SCT design, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: SCT design, Roger Hamlett
  • Re: SCT design, William Hamblen
  • Re: SCT design, Mike Ruskai
  • Message not available
    • Re: SCT design, thad
  • Message not available
    • Re: SCT design, Stephen Paul
• Re: ISRO To Launch Israel's Spy Satellite, Hilton Evans
  • Re: ISRO To Launch Israel's Spy Satellite, Shneor
• Constellation Stamps, Hilton Evans
  • Re: Constellation Stamps, ko57
    • Re: Constellation Stamps, Florian
  • Re: Constellation Stamps, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Constellation Stamps, Japetus
      • Re: Constellation Stamps, RMOLLISE
• Re: ep advice, Chuck Taylor
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ep advice, g626700-groups
    • Re: ep advice, Jay Swartzfeger
      • Re: ep advice, Doink
      • Re: ep advice, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: ep advice, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: ep advice, Mark D
    • Re: ep advice, jimandlaura26
  • Re: ep advice, wsnell01
    • Re: ep advice, Jay Swartzfeger
      • Re: ep advice, RAMangold
      • Re: ep advice, thad
      • Re: ep advice, Mark D
      • Re: ep advice, Jay Swartzfeger
      • Re: ep advice, wsnell01
      • Re: ep advice, john carruthers
      • Re: ep advice, Mark S. Holden
      • Re: ep advice, Chuck Taylor
      • Re: ep advice, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: ep advice, Sailing Away
  • Re: ep advice, Andrew Nicolle
• Good astro binocular, really, Stephen Paul
• Re: PST first light, nytecam
• M42 and 11x56 binocs, G.T.
• Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, nytecam
  • Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, jsavard
    • Message not available
      • Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, jeff
      • Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, jsavard
      • Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, bratislav3162
      • Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, jsavard
      • Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, Chuck Taylor
      • Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, Howard Lester
      • Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, Tim Killian
      • Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, bratislav3162
      • Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, bratislav3162
      • Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, jsavard
      • Re: Inexpensive Telescope Design Revealed, Richard F.L.R.Snashall
• the insanity has commenced..., Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: the insanity has commenced..., john carruthers
    • Message not available
      • Re: the insanity has commenced..., Stephen Paul
  • Re: the insanity has commenced..., Stephen Paul
  • Re: the insanity has commenced..., Havriliak
  • Re: the insanity has commenced..., Davoud
    • Re: the insanity has commenced..., Shawn
    • Re: the insanity has commenced..., Sam Wormley
  • Re: the insanity has commenced..., Joe S.
  • Re: the insanity has commenced..., Paul Winalski
    • Re: the insanity has commenced..., jimandlaura26
    • Re: the insanity has commenced..., tmbMike
      • Re: the insanity has commenced..., g626700-groups
      • Re: the insanity has commenced..., Tom Rauschenbach
• Black Friday adds anyone?, G
• Rosamond Report, Starlord
• Re: Fireball- Dublin CA, boofreak
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fireball- Dublin CA, Kukuriku
    • Re: Fireball- Dublin CA, PaulCsouls
  • Re: Fireball- Dublin CA, Davoud
    • Re: Fireball- Dublin CA, Mij Adyaw
    • Re: Fireball- Dublin CA, PaulCsouls
      • Re: Fireball- Dublin CA, Shawn
  • Re: Fireball- Dublin CA, PaulCsouls
• early morning galaxy hunting, boofreak
  • Re: early morning galaxy hunting, Larry Stedman
    • Re: early morning galaxy hunting, boofreak
  • Re: early morning galaxy hunting, tony_flanders
• Re: Space Rockets, Crusader
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Space Rockets, canopus56
• Re: Back on the sidewalk in Fairfax, CA (long, ADD warning), Dave Jessie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Back on the sidewalk in Fairfax, CA (long, ADD warning), starburst
  • Re: Back on the sidewalk in Fairfax, CA (long, ADD warning), Starlord
  • Re: Back on the sidewalk in Fairfax, CA (long, ADD warning), Starlord
    • Re: Back on the sidewalk in Fairfax, CA (long, ADD warning), Uncle Bob
  • Re: Back on the sidewalk in Fairfax, CA (long, ADD warning), Morris Jones
    • Re: Back on the sidewalk in Fairfax, CA (long, ADD warning), Uncle Bob
  • Re: Back on the sidewalk in Fairfax, CA (long, ADD warning), boofreak
• Japanese probing robot may have failed to land on asteroid, jhaveri_alay
• Re: Philips Toucam Pro webcam?, Carsten A. Arnholm
• Rubber eyepiece cups needed, Bill Cotten
  • Re: Rubber eyepiece cups needed, jimandlaura26
  • Re: Rubber eyepiece cups needed, Hilton Evans
  • Re: Rubber eyepiece cups needed, Bill Cotten
• Dew Heaters to Become Obsolete?, Mark Gingrich
  • Re: Dew Heaters to Become Obsolete?, Tim Killian
    • Re: Dew Heaters to Become Obsolete?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Dew Heaters to Become Obsolete?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Dew Heaters to Become Obsolete?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Dew Heaters to Become Obsolete?, Chris L Peterson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Dew Heaters to Become Obsolete?, thad
      • Re: Dew Heaters to Become Obsolete?, SkySea
      • Re: Dew Heaters to Become Obsolete?, Joe Bergeron
      • Re: Dew Heaters to Become Obsolete?, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Dew Heaters to Become Obsolete?, wa2ise
      • Re: Dew Heaters to Become Obsolete?, thad
• Telescope Question, Miss Livvy
  • Re: Telescope Question, Jan Owen
  • Re: Telescope Question, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: Telescope Question, Mark S .
  • Re: Telescope Question, Starlord
  • Re: Telescope Question, g626700-groups
• Re: AAA news Nov 2005 6/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: AAA news Nov 2005 5/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: AAA news Nov 2005 4/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: AAA news Nov 2005 3/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: AAA news Nov 2005 2/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: AAA news Nov 2005 1/ 6, JOHN PAZMINO
• Relativity question, Doink
  • Re: Relativity question, Hilton Evans
    • Re: Relativity question, Doink
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: Relativity question, David G. Nagel
      • Re: Relativity question, lal_truckee
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Ioannis
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Skywise
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Skywise
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Relativity question, Brian Tung
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Martin Brown
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Martin Brown
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Skywise
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Skywise
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Skywise
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Skywise
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Skywise
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Skywise
      • Re: Relativity question, DT
      • Re: Relativity question, Skywise
  • Re: Relativity question, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Relativity question, oriel36
      • Re: Relativity question, Sam Wormley
      • Message not available
      • Re: Relativity question, Shawn
  • Re: Relativity question, Skywise
  • Re: Relativity question, Paul Winalski
    • Re: Relativity question, Doink
  • Re: Relativity question, William Hamblen
  • Re: Relativity question, Brian Tung
    • Re: Relativity question, Martin Brown
      • Re: Relativity question, Brian Tung
      • Re: Relativity question, Doink
      • Re: Relativity question, Brian Tung
      • Re: Relativity question, Martin Brown
• Re: Logitech webcam?, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Logitech webcam?, Jay Swartzfeger
• speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Howard Lester
  • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Dave Jessie
    • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Howard Lester
      • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Ed Erbeck Jr.
      • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Howard Lester
      • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Ed Erbeck Jr.
      • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Howard Lester
      • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Ed Erbeck Jr.
      • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Howard Lester
    • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, William Hamblen
  • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Mark S. Holden
  • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Davoud
    • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Erik
  • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Joe S.
    • Re: speaking of Copernicus: what's wrong with THIS cartoon?, Howard Lester
• how to mount a PST, md
  • Re: how to mount a PST, Michael McCulloch
    • Re: how to mount a PST, Doink
• Huge Meteorite Found Underground in Kansas, USA, jhaveri_alay
  • Re: Huge Meteorite Found Underground in Kansas, USA, Tom Randy
    • Re: Huge Meteorite Found Underground in Kansas, USA, Fred Garvin
• Can a 'shadow' move faster than light?, nytecam
  • Re: Can a 'shadow' move faster than light?, Raving Loonie
  • Message not available
    • Re: Can a 'shadow' move faster than light?, Chuck Taylor
      • Re: Can a 'shadow' move faster than light?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Can a 'shadow' move faster than light?, Martin Brown
      • Re: Can a 'shadow' move faster than light?, plawler@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Can a 'shadow' move faster than light?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Can a 'shadow' move faster than light?, Vernon
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can a 'shadow' move faster than light?, Tim Killian
• Lesson for everyone, astronut
  • Re: Lesson for everyone, john carruthers
  • Re: Lesson for everyone, Roger Hamlett
    • Re: Lesson for everyone, fcathell
      • Re: Lesson for everyone, scribe2b
      • Re: Lesson for everyone, Doink
      • Re: Lesson for everyone, AstroHoney
      • Re: Lesson for everyone, Starlord
      • Re: Lesson for everyone, astronut
      • Re: Lesson for everyone, Jan Owen
      • Re: Lesson for everyone, john carruthers
      • Re: Lesson for everyone, Doink
  • Re: Lesson for everyone, katrinaxx
  • Re: Lesson for everyone, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: Lesson for everyone, Cass & Tony L'Hotellier
    • Re: Lesson for everyone, Florian
    • Re: Lesson for everyone, Marty
      • Re: Lesson for everyone, Howard Lester
  • Re: Lesson for everyone, Rich
    • Re: Lesson for everyone, AstroHoney
      • Re: Lesson for everyone, Rich
  • Re: Lesson for everyone, Tim Killian
  • Re: Lesson for everyone, canopus56
    • Re: Lesson for everyone, Martin Brown
  • Re: Lesson for everyone, scribe2b
• proms return !, nytecam
• Re: Bright meteor caught on tape, Coppy Littlehouse
  • Re: Bright meteor caught on tape, Chris L Peterson
• Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, Jay Swartzfeger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, Doink
    • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, Shawn Curry
      • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, Doink
      • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, Shawn Curry
      • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, Chuck Taylor
      • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, Jan Owen
      • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, JD
      • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, wsnell01
  • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, wsnell01
  • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, FOXZ News Gored
    • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, Shawn Curry
      • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, FOXZ News Gored
      • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, FOXZ News Gored
      • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, Shawn Curry
  • Re: So how come education is so underfunded???, jsavard
• A Flare for Barnard's Star, Magnificent Universe
• The First Interstellar Gas in a Globular Cluster?, Magnificent Universe
• Mars/bright feature Nov 8, Dan
  • Re: Mars/bright feature Nov 8, fcathell
    • Message not available
      • Re: Mars/bright feature Nov 8, fcathell
• Glass still a mystery, Rich
  • Re: Glass still a mystery, Skywise
    • Re: Glass still a mystery, Matalog
  • Re: Glass still a mystery, elaich
    • Re: Glass still a mystery, Rich
• They found Copernicus! Maybe, Rich
  • Re: They found Copernicus! Maybe, Mark F.
• Johannesburg skies, lal_truckee
  • Re: Johannesburg skies, eugene
  • Message not available
    • Re: Johannesburg skies, lal_truckee
• YOUNG STARS SCULPT GAS WITH POWERFUL OUTFLOWS (STScI-PRC05-35), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
• Nikon D100 for astrophotography, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: Nikon D100 for astrophotography, Jay Swartzfeger
    • Re: Nikon D100 for astrophotography, Mark S. Holden
• Free web-based astro seminar this Sunday, hannahvfromdublin
• More Lights, Starlord
  • Re: More Lights, tmbMike
    • Re: More Lights, Shawn
      • Re: More Lights, Gary
• Question, Starlord
  • Re: Question, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Question, Mike Simmons
  • Re: Question, George
  • Re: Question, tmbMike
    • Re: Question, ko57
      • Re: Question, G
• Re: Mars now, rat ~( );>
  • Re: Mars now, decaf
• Legos in Astronomy?, W. Watson
  • Re: Legos in Astronomy?, blart
  • Re: Legos in Astronomy?, Kevin
• Laptop for LX200, west
  • Re: Laptop for LX200, Terry A Haimann
  • Re: Laptop for LX200, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Laptop for LX200, Mark S. Holden
      • Re: Laptop for LX200, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Laptop for LX200, Davoud
    • Re: Laptop for LX200, Jay Swartzfeger
      • Re: Laptop for LX200, Davoud
      • Re: Laptop for LX200, starburst
      • Re: Laptop for LX200, Jay Swartzfeger
      • Re: Laptop for LX200, Davoud
  • Re: Laptop for LX200, Martin Brown
    • Re: Laptop for LX200, Davoud
      • Re: Laptop for LX200, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Laptop for LX200, Eric Kay
      • Re: Laptop for LX200, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: Laptop for LX200, Martin Brown
    • Re: Laptop for LX200, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: Laptop for LX200, Jeff Polston
    • Re: Laptop for LX200, Hilton Evans
  • Re: Laptop for LX200, bob
• NJ man pleads guilty to laser prank on jet, Pete Rasmussen
• Re: Test of Astro cam CCDs in Brit magazine, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Test of Astro cam CCDs in Brit magazine, Rich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Test of Astro cam CCDs in Brit magazine, Pete Lawrence
    • Re: Test of Astro cam CCDs in Brit magazine, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Message not available
      • Re: Test of Astro cam CCDs in Brit magazine, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Test of Astro cam CCDs in Brit magazine, Rich
      • Re: Test of Astro cam CCDs in Brit magazine, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: Test of Astro cam CCDs in Brit magazine, Rich
      • Re: Test of Astro cam CCDs in Brit magazine, Pete Lawrence
  • Re: Test of Astro cam CCDs in Brit magazine, Anthony Ayiomamitis
• Celestron NexStar 11 GPS Telescope for Sale on Ebay UK, George Dingwall
• Anyone use Celestia?, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: Anyone use Celestia?, Martin R. Howell
    • Re: Anyone use Celestia?, Florian
      • Re: Anyone use Celestia?, Jay Swartzfeger
    • Re: Anyone use Celestia?, Jay Swartzfeger
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anyone use Celestia?, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Anyone use Celestia?, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: Anyone use Celestia?, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: Anyone use Celestia?, Bob Lewis
  • Re: Anyone use Celestia?, Craig M . Bobchin
• New Absorption Filters, alm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: New Absorption Filters, RMOLLISE
    • Re: New Absorption Filters, Dennis Woos
    • Re: New Absorption Filters, alm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: New Absorption Filters, lal_truckee
    • Re: New Absorption Filters, alm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: New Absorption Filters, George
      • Re: New Absorption Filters, g626700-groups
      • Re: New Absorption Filters, Chuck Taylor
• 2005 Chiefland Star Party, RMOLLISE
  • Re: 2005 Chiefland Star Party, Jason H.
• Objective lens tilting effect on target, Scott
  • Re: Objective lens tilting effect on target, Hilton Evans
  • Re: Objective lens tilting effect on target, Doink
• Re: Finder that accepts an eyepiece?, Roger Hamlett
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Finder that accepts an eyepiece?, Ed T
  • Re: Finder that accepts an eyepiece?, starburst
  • Re: Finder that accepts an eyepiece?, RMOLLISE
  • Re: Finder that accepts an eyepiece?, Michael McCulloch
    • Re: Finder that accepts an eyepiece?, Mark S. Holden
    • Re: Finder that accepts an eyepiece?, Mark D
  • Re: Finder that accepts an eyepiece?, jimandlaura26
• Re: Simple galactic calculations?, canopus56
  • Re: Simple galactic calculations?, canopus56
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Simple galactic calculations?, canopus56
  • Re: Simple galactic calculations?, Dan Mckenna
  • Re: Simple galactic calculations?, canopus56
• Coulter Optical / E-Scopes mirrors, Phil
  • Re: Coulter Optical / E-Scopes mirrors, tbennett
  • Re: Coulter Optical / E-Scopes mirrors, Phil
• Re: Fireball over Queens, NY!, Spongey
  • Re: Fireball over Queens, NY!, Joe S.
• Mars through LX200, md
  • Re: Mars through LX200, Kukuriku
    • Re: Mars through LX200, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Kukuriku
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Kukuriku
      • Re: Mars through LX200, David Knisely
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Kukuriku
      • Re: Mars through LX200, starburst
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Brian Tung
      • Re: Mars through LX200, starburst
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Brian Tung
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Stephen Paul
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Brian Tung
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Brian Tung
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Kukuriku
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Mars through LX200, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Pete Lawrence
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Mark D
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Pete Lawrence
      • Re: Mars through LX200, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Pete Lawrence
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Kukuriku
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Mij Adyaw
    • Re: Mars through LX200, thad
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Shawn
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Havriliak
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Havriliak
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Kukuriku
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Kukuriku
    • Re: Mars through LX200, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Mars through LX200, JD
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Mark D
  • Re: Mars through LX200, Mark D
    • Re: Mars through LX200, Pete Lawrence
      • Re: Mars through LX200, md
    • Re: Mars through LX200, starburst
      • Re: Mars through LX200, decaf
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Mark D
      • Re: Mars through LX200, starburst
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Brian Tung
      • Re: Mars through LX200, decaf
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Brian Tung
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Kukuriku
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mars through LX200, JD
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Brian Tung
      • Re: Mars through LX200, JD
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mars through LX200, JD
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Kukuriku
      • Re: Mars through LX200, Brian Tung
  • Re: Mars through LX200, md
    • Re: Mars through LX200, Mark D
• Seeing conditions - website, Dan
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Seeing conditions - website, Dan
      • Re: Seeing conditions - website, canopus56
      • Re: Seeing conditions - website, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: Seeing conditions - website, canopus56
      • Re: Seeing conditions - website, Dan Mckenna
      • Re: Seeing conditions - website, reconair
      • Re: Seeing conditions - website, canopus56
      • Re: Seeing conditions - website, reconair
  • Re: Seeing conditions - website, Shawn
• Last Saturday Night, Starlord
• Hardcase for Orion Atlas mount, canopus56
  • Re: Hardcase for Orion Atlas mount, Doink
    • Re: Hardcase for Orion Atlas mount, Mark D
  • Re: Hardcase for Orion Atlas mount, canopus56
• Astronomy magazine article on Tele Vue, ronbeeh
  • Re: Astronomy magazine article on Tele Vue, Mark D
• Re: Vixen Porta - users guide ?, Carismo
• Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Doink
  • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Doink
    • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Ed T
    • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, john carruthers
    • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Cass & Tony L'Hotellier
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Phil Wheeler
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Doink
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Cass & Tony L'Hotellier
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Doink
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Cass & Tony L'Hotellier
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Doink
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Doink
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Doink
      • Re: Reasonable Zoom Eyepiece?, Mark D
• Re: Australia's Sky&Space Magazine, Zana & Al
  • Re: Australia's Sky&Space Magazine, Terry B
    • Re: Australia's Sky&Space Magazine, Anthony Ayiomamitis
• What can I image in 30 seconds?, newbinaries
• Beginner - need assistance with Skywatcher Reflector lense config, gingerdazza
  • Re: Beginner - need assistance with Skywatcher Reflector lense config, g626700-groups
    • Re: Beginner - need assistance with Skywatcher Reflector lense config, gingerdazza
      • Re: Beginner - need assistance with Skywatcher Reflector lense config, g626700-groups
      • Re: Beginner - need assistance with Skywatcher Reflector lense config, gingerdazza
  • Re: Beginner - need assistance with Skywatcher Reflector lense config, Chuck Taylor
    • Re: Beginner - need assistance with Skywatcher Reflector lense config, g626700-groups
  • Re: Beginner - need assistance with Skywatcher Reflector lense config, Doink
• Re: newbie, Richard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: newbie, Mark S. Holden
  • Re: newbie, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: newbie, Doink
  • Re: newbie, Starlord
  • Re: newbie, Hilton Evans
    • Re: newbie, Richard
      • Message not available
      • Re: newbie, Mean Mr Mustard
• Celestial christmas trees: M39, M103 and NGC 2264, orion94nl
  • Message not available
    • Re: Celestial christmas trees: M39, M103 and NGC 2264, orion94nl
  • Re: Celestial christmas trees: M39, M103 and NGC 2264, RMOLLISE
• Today Mars is the Brightest and at Opposition to Earth !, jhaveri_alay
  • Re: Today Mars is the Brightest and at Opposition to Earth !, oriel36
    • Message not available
      • Re: Today Mars is the Brightest and at Opposition to Earth !, oriel36
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Today Mars is the Brightest and at Opposition to Earth !, tony_flanders
      • Re: Today Mars is the Brightest and at Opposition to Earth !, tmbMike
  • Re: Today Mars is the Brightest and at Opposition to Earth !, Mij Adyaw
    • Re: Today Mars is the Brightest and at Opposition to Earth !, Jan Owen
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Today Mars is the Brightest and at Opposition to Earth !, Doink
      • Re: Today Mars is the Brightest and at Opposition to Earth !, Phil Wheeler
• Cerco test sulle stelle del Sigma 20-70 F/2.8-4, Gianluca Li Causi
  • Re: Cerco test sulle stelle del Sigma 20-70 F/2.8-4, Beta Persei
• Hurricanes can spawn tornadoes, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Hurricanes can spawn tornadoes, RMOLLISE
  • Message not available
    • Re: Hurricanes can spawn tornadoes, Shawn
      • Re: Hurricanes can spawn tornadoes, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Hurricanes can spawn tornadoes, Shawn
      • Re: Hurricanes can spawn tornadoes, Martin Brown
• Warmer Seas, Wetter Air Make Harder Rains as Greenhouse Gases Build, Sam Wormley
• Re: Low power ep for 8" newt, Shneor
  • Re: Low power ep for 8" newt, g626700-groups
    • Re: Low power ep for 8" newt, Doink
• Free web-based seminar on spectroscopy, newbinaries
• Free web-based seminar on asteroids, newbinaries
• Updated Astro Image Web Site - Please take a look., Jason Ware
• solar pics thro glass!, nytecam
  • Re: solar pics thro glass!, RAMangold
    • Message not available
      • Re: solar pics thro glass!, Brian Tung
      • Re: solar pics thro glass!, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: solar pics thro glass!, nytecam
• Finally, Images of Mars, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Finally, Images of Mars, Doink
• Very Stupid Newbie Question - I blew up my first telescope - Tasco 45-060525, tavarish
  • Re: Very Stupid Newbie Question - I blew up my first telescope - Tasco 45-060525, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Very Stupid Newbie Question - I blew up my first telescope - Tasco 45-060525, David G. Nagel
    • Re: Very Stupid Newbie Question - I blew up my first telescope - Tasco 45-060525, tavarish
    • Message not available
      • Re: Very Stupid Newbie Question - I blew up my first telescope - Tasco 45-060525, Gil
    • Re: Very Stupid Newbie Question - I blew up my first telescope - Tasco 45-060525, Ernie Dunbar
  • Re: Very Stupid Newbie Question - I blew up my first telescope - Tasco 45-060525, Hilton Evans
    • Re: Very Stupid Newbie Question - I blew up my first telescope - Tasco 45-060525, tavarish
  • Message not available
    • Re: Very Stupid Newbie Question - I blew up my first telescope - Tasco 45-060525, wsnell01
• SAA Mugshots - and now we have Dobson!, George Normandin
  • Re: SAA Mugshots - and now we have Dobson!, tmbMike
• 89mm Questar takes on 206mm Astro-Physics at Mars Skywatch!, Davoud
  • Re: 89mm Questar takes on 206mm Astro-Physics at Mars Skywatch!, Coppy Littlehouse
    • Message not available
      • Re: 89mm Questar takes on 206mm Astro-Physics at Mars Skywatch!, Davoud
  • Re: 89mm Questar takes on 206mm Astro-Physics at Mars Skywatch!, JD
    • Re: 89mm Questar takes on 206mm Astro-Physics at Mars Skywatch!, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: 89mm Questar takes on 206mm Astro-Physics at Mars Skywatch!, Davoud
    • Re: 89mm Questar takes on 206mm Astro-Physics at Mars Skywatch!, Davoud
  • Re: 89mm Questar takes on 206mm Astro-Physics at Mars Skywatch!, Ernie Wright
• Hayabusa and asteroid Itokawa, Phil
  • Re: Hayabusa and asteroid Itokawa, md
• any color?, Zarkovic
  • Re: any color?, Matthew Ota
• OT: Electronic paper moves from sci-fi to marketplace, Kukuriku
• Mars Moons - How Challenging, tmbMike
  • Re: Mars Moons - How Challenging, Greg Crinklaw
    • Re: Mars Moons - How Challenging, Tom
      • Re: Mars Moons - How Challenging, John Nichols
      • Re: Mars Moons - How Challenging, tmbMike
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mars Moons - How Challenging, tmbMike
• Which filter is most appropriate?, Rob
  • Re: Which filter is most appropriate?, Dave Jessie
  • Re: Which filter is most appropriate?, tony_flanders
    • Re: Which filter is most appropriate?, George Normandin
      • Re: Which filter is most appropriate?, Shneor
      • Message not available
      • Re: Which filter is most appropriate?, Dan McShane
• Off topic: Removing coating from lenses., Roberto Waltman
  • Re: Off topic: Removing coating from lenses., Chris L Peterson
• How Far to Andromeda? The First Direct Distance Determination, Magnificent Universe
  • Re: How Far to Andromeda? The First Direct Distance Determination, Sam Wormley
  • Re: How Far to Andromeda? The First Direct Distance Determination, Michael McCulloch
    • Re: How Far to Andromeda? The First Direct Distance Determination, Magnificent Universe
      • Re: How Far to Andromeda? The First Direct Distance Determination, Michael McCulloch
• FS: Televue 1.25" Eyepieces and other stuff on Ebay UK, George Dingwall
• Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, skarkada
  • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, skarkada
    • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, tony_flanders
      • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, Jan Owen
    • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, skarkada
    • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, skarkada
      • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, Starlord
  • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, JATO
  • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, jimandlaura26
  • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, Pierre
  • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, skarkada
  • Re: Orion XT8: Light spikes from bright objects, boo
• ddfssssss, stefan . azzurro
  • Re: ddfssssss, johnschiap
• Kepler's explanation of the 'Pretzel', oriel36
• Tips on viewing Mars?, Just Me
  • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, md
    • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, john carruthers
  • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Dennis Woos
  • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Greg Crinklaw
  • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Jan Owen
    • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Jan Owen
  • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, vahe240d
    • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, decaf
    • Message not available
      • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, vahe240d
  • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, jimandlaura26
    • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Starlord
      • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, jimandlaura26
  • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Just Me
    • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Starlord
      • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, tony_flanders
      • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Starlord
      • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, tony_flanders
      • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, md
    • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, tony_flanders
  • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Kukuriku
  • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, laura halliday
    • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Chris.B
      • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, decaf
      • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Tips on viewing Mars?, Chem Student
• s.a.a., google, and a newsgroup server, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: s.a.a., google, and a newsgroup server, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: s.a.a., google, and a newsgroup server, Jay Swartzfeger
• New telescope distributor, Rich
  • Re: New telescope distributor, dougspeterson
    • Re: New telescope distributor, Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: New telescope distributor, Stephen Paul
      • Re: New telescope distributor, Howard Lester
      • Re: New telescope distributor, Ed Erbeck Jr.
    • Re: New telescope distributor, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: New telescope distributor, lal_truckee
      • Re: New telescope distributor, Rich
      • Re: New telescope distributor, Gobbletwo
    • Re: New telescope distributor, Tom Rauschenbach
• Formula for converting Epoch 1950 RA/DEC to Epoch 2000, Paul Winalski
  • Re: Formula for converting Epoch 1950 RA/DEC to Epoch 2000, canopus56
  • Re: Formula for converting Epoch 1950 RA/DEC to Epoch 2000, Greg Crinklaw
  • Re: Formula for converting Epoch 1950 RA/DEC to Epoch 2000, Chris L Peterson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Formula for converting Epoch 1950 RA/DEC to Epoch 2000, Chris L Peterson
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Formula for converting Epoch 1950 RA/DEC to Epoch 2000, Brian Tung
    • Re: Formula for converting Epoch 1950 RA/DEC to Epoch 2000, canopus56
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Formula for converting Epoch 1950 RA/DEC to Epoch 2000, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Formula for converting Epoch 1950 RA/DEC to Epoch 2000, Robert Sheaffer
    • Re: Formula for converting Epoch 1950 RA/DEC to Epoch 2000, Robert Sheaffer
  • Re: Formula for converting Epoch 1950 RA/DEC to Epoch 2000, Paul Winalski
• beginner: my first two weeks, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: beginner: my first two weeks, Chuck Taylor
    • Re: beginner: my first two weeks, Shawn
  • Re: beginner: my first two weeks, Dave Jessie
  • Re: beginner: my first two weeks, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Message not available
    • Re: beginner: my first two weeks, Jay Swartzfeger
  • Re: beginner: my first two weeks, tony_flanders
  • Re: beginner: my first two weeks, john carruthers
• wide field on M31 M33 NGC752, manastro
  • Re: wide field on M31 M33 NGC752, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: wide field on M31 M33 NGC752, manastro
      • Re: wide field on M31 M33 NGC752, Marty
      • Re: wide field on M31 M33 NGC752, manastro
• Diagonal dropped on main mirror - ouch!, C.W. Thomas
  • Re: Diagonal dropped on main mirror - ouch!, Rich
  • Re: Diagonal dropped on main mirror - ouch!, Martin Brown
  • Re: Diagonal dropped on main mirror - ouch!, Starlord
  • Re: Diagonal dropped on main mirror - ouch!, David G. Nagel
  • Re: Diagonal dropped on main mirror - ouch!, lal_truckee
  • Re: Diagonal dropped on main mirror - ouch!, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: Diagonal dropped on main mirror - ouch!, Hilton Evans
    • Re: Diagonal dropped on main mirror - ouch!, Mild One
      • Re: Diagonal dropped on main mirror - ouch!, Hilton Evans
  • Re: Diagonal dropped on main mirror - ouch!, C.W. Thomas
  • Re: Diagonal dropped on main mirror - ouch!, George Normandin
• Coronado PST review, nytecam
  • Re: Coronado PST review, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Coronado PST review, RAMangold
      • Re: Coronado PST review, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Coronado PST review, RAMangold
      • Re: Coronado PST review, Phil
      • Re: Coronado PST review, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Coronado PST review, RAMangold
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coronado PST review, Phil Wheeler
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Coronado PST review, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Coronado PST review, RAMangold
      • Re: Coronado PST review, Brian Tung
      • Re: Coronado PST review, RAMangold
      • Re: Coronado PST review, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Coronado PST review, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Coronado PST review, Phil
      • Re: Coronado PST review, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Coronado PST review, nytecam
      • Re: Coronado PST review, Brian Tung
• Re: Help - Non-rotating focusing tube, JD
  • Re: Help - Non-rotating focusing tube, Roger Hamlett
• atrophotography knowledge transfer: avi-to-single frame interpolation, Jeremy Taylor
  • Re: atrophotography knowledge transfer: avi-to-single frame interpolation, john carruthers
    • Re: atrophotography knowledge transfer: avi-to-single frame interpolation, Jeremy Taylor
  • Re: atrophotography knowledge transfer: avi-to-single frame interpolation, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: atrophotography knowledge transfer: avi-to-single frame interpolation, Jeremy Taylor
  • Message not available
    • Re: atrophotography knowledge transfer: avi-to-single frame interpolation, Jeremy Taylor
  • Message not available
    • Re: atrophotography knowledge transfer: avi-to-single frame interpolation, Jeremy Taylor
      • Re: atrophotography knowledge transfer: avi-to-single frame interpolation, Martin Brown
• Re: Online calculators for position angle, Richard Bullock
  • Re: Online calculators for position angle, canopus56
  • Message not available
    • Re: Online calculators for position angle, thad
  • Message not available
    • Re: Online calculators for position angle, canopus56
      • Re: Online calculators for position angle, Paul Schlyter
  • Message not available
    • Re: Online calculators for position angle, Mark Gingrich
      • hook and crook, was Re: Online calculators for position angle, Brian Tung
      • Re: hook and crook, was Re: Online calculators for position angle, Mark Gingrich
      • Re: Online calculators for position angle, canopus56
      • Re: Online calculators for position angle, Brian Tung
      • Re: Online calculators for position angle, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Online calculators for position angle, Paul Schlyter
      • Message not available
      • Re: Online calculators for position angle, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: Online calculators for position angle, canopus56
      • Re: Online calculators for position angle, Bill Owen
      • Re: Online calculators for position angle, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: Online calculators for position angle, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: Online calculators for position angle, William Hamblen
• unusual number of nighttime fireballs, Sam Wormley
  • Re: unusual number of nighttime fireballs, katrinaxx
  • Re: unusual number of nighttime fireballs, Uncle Bob
  • Message not available
    • Re: unusual number of nighttime fireballs, JATO
  • Re: unusual number of nighttime fireballs, ed1ward2
    • Re: unusual number of nighttime fireballs, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: unusual number of nighttime fireballs, Sam Wormley
      • Message not available
      • Re: unusual number of nighttime fireballs, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: unusual number of nighttime fireballs, Ernie Wright
  • Re: unusual number of nighttime fireballs, Matthew Ota
  • Message not available
    • Re: unusual number of nighttime fireballs, Bob Riddle
      • Re: unusual number of nighttime fireballs, Spongey
      • Re: unusual number of nighttime fireballs, Chris L Peterson
• Telrad vs EZ Finder, Wayne Barber
  • Re: Telrad vs EZ Finder, Ed B.
  • Re: Telrad vs EZ Finder, Shawn
  • Re: Telrad vs EZ Finder, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Telrad vs EZ Finder, Paul Winalski
  • Re: Telrad vs EZ Finder, Jay Swartzfeger
    • Message not available
      • Re: Telrad vs EZ Finder, Wayne Barber
• Mars images, Beta Persei
  • Re: Mars images, FOXZ News Gored
  • Re: Mars images, duhme
  • Re: Mars images, Tom Randy
• it's happened!, nytecam
• MARS KICKS UP THE DUST AS IT MAKES CLOSEST APPROACH TO EARTH (STScI-PRC05-34-Heritage), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
• Ode to Astronomer/Telescope Operator, Matthew Ota
• Don't hold your breath for the Thirty Meter Telescope, bolt_rollins
  • Re: Don't hold your breath for the Thirty Meter Telescope, Vernon
  • Re: Don't hold your breath for the Thirty Meter Telescope, Phil
  • Re: Don't hold your breath for the Thirty Meter Telescope, nytecam
• Re: Lowell Observatory Shots, George Normandin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lowell Observatory Shots, Matthew Ota
    • Re: Lowell Observatory Shots, Craig M . Bobchin
• Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., Rich
  • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., Skywise
    • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., AstroHoney
      • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., Chris.B
    • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., Tim Killian
  • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., Phil
    • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., dougspeterson
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., David G. Nagel
      • Message not available
      • Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, Rich
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, Starlord
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, John Savard
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, Rich
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, Starlord
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, Rich
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, Tom Rauschenbach
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, Davoud
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, Rich
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, AstroHoney
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, T.T.
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, banjaxed
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, John Savard
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, Rich
      • Re: Rich / RichA = Troll and continues to be anti-Chinese, John Savard
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., Rich
      • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., dougspeterson
      • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., Tim Auton
      • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., Rich
  • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., FOXZ News Gored
  • Re: Sad to see "Celestron" turned into just another "Chinese" supplier...., Pippen
• Juno in Orion, William C. Keel
  • Re: Juno in Orion, Larry Stedman
• Re: OT:Very alarming, CO2 at 360 ppm!!!!!, fcathell
• Re: How do they do it?, FOXZ News Boson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How do they do it?, FOXZ News Boson
  • Re: How do they do it?, Chris.B
• Re: Need Optics Cleaning Help, FOXZ News Boson
• Five years and $190B, Rich
  • Re: Five years and $190B, stone583
• Re: Iroquois confederacy eclipse?, FOXZ News Boson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Iroquois confederacy eclipse?, FOXZ News Boson
• More inefficient, expensive rockets on horizon, Rich
  • Re: More inefficient, expensive rockets on horizon, FOXZ News Boson
• Temper as red as Mars, Starlord
  • Re: Temper as red as Mars, ko57
    • Re: Temper as red as Mars, Starlord
  • Re: Temper as red as Mars, john carruthers
    • Re: Temper as red as Mars, Starlord
      • Re: Temper as red as Mars, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Temper as red as Mars, Beta Persei
    • Re: Temper as red as Mars, ko57
• Re: Betelgeuse dimmer?, FOXZ News Boson
• Re: Gravitational weirdness, whop whop whop
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gravitational weirdness, FOXZ News Boson
• Re: false info == TROLL!, whop whop whop
• 80/f5 For the In-Laws, derek
• more observing, boofreak
• Re: PUSSY DESTRUCTION, portaballer@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PUSSY DESTRUCTION, -Lost
• The new saa Mugshots page!, Gareth Slee
  • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, Starlord
    • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, Dave Jessie
      • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, -Lost
  • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, George Normandin
    • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, Tom Wales
      • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, George Normandin
  • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, Tom Polakis
    • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, Richard F.L.R.Snashall
    • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, Al Wilson
      • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, -Lost
  • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, Matthew Ota
  • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, Len Philpot
    • Re: The new saa Mugshots page!, Marty
• For Better or for Worse comic stip, Florian
  • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, Sam Wormley
    • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, Florian
      • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, Sam Wormley
      • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, Cousin Ricky
      • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, Nick Theodorakis
    • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, Davoud
    • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, Dave Jessie
      • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, Starlord
      • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, g626700-groups
      • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, Howard Lester
      • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, tmbMike
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, Marty
    • Re: For Better or for Worse comic stip, Howard Lester
• Behold! Meade Truss-DOB's are coming!, Kukuriku
  • Re: Behold! Meade Truss-DOB's are coming!, Starlord
  • Re: Behold! Meade Truss-DOB's are coming!, Ben S.
    • Re: Behold! Meade Truss-DOB's are coming!, john carruthers
      • Re: Behold! Meade Truss-DOB's are coming!, Ben S.
      • Re: Behold! Meade Truss-DOB's are coming!, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Behold! Meade Truss-DOB's are coming!, George Normandin
    • Re: Behold! Meade Truss-DOB's are coming!, Paul Winalski
• Re: ToUcam Pro 840k Webcam, reconair
  • Re: ToUcam Pro 840k Webcam, Tom Rauschenbach
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ToUcam Pro 840k Webcam, Michael McCulloch
    • Re: ToUcam Pro 840k Webcam, Thomas Dickens
      • Re: ToUcam Pro 840k Webcam, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: ToUcam Pro 840k Webcam, Thomas Dickens
  • Re: ToUcam Pro 840k Webcam, RMOLLISE
• Re: Celestron C-8, old Byres fork, how much?, George Normandin
  • Message not available
    • Re: Celestron C-8, old Byres fork, how much?, George Normandin
      • Re: Celestron C-8, old Byres fork, how much?, Chuck Taylor
• Meade Wireless Autostar II, Steve Holzworth
• Re: Mars 2005-10-31, RS
  • Re: Mars 2005-10-31, Pete Lawrence
• Re: buytelescopes.com trustworthy?, Pierre Vandevennne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: buytelescopes.com trustworthy?, lal_truckee
  • Re: buytelescopes.com trustworthy?, FOXZ News Boson
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: buytelescopes.com trustworthy?, Jim Attfield
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: buytelescopes.com trustworthy?, jerry warner
• Re: Binocular Telescope Sees First Light, Esmail Bonakdarian
• Observing on the move, Zinc Potterman
  • Re: Observing on the move, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Observing on the move, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Observing on the move, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: Observing on the move, Stephen Paul
  • Message not available
    • Re: Observing on the move, Zinc Potterman
  • Re: Observing on the move, Zinc Potterman
• Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Paul Schlyter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Paul Schlyter
  • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Bob May
    • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Robert Grumbine
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Martin Brown
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, FOXZ News Gored
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Robert Grumbine
      • Message not available
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, FOXZ News Gored
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, FOXZ News Gored
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, oriel36
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, oriel36
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, oriel36
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, wsnell01
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Rich
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Chris L Peterson
      • Message not available
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, oriel36
      • Message not available
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Martin Brown
      • Message not available
      • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Erik
  • Re: And the Earth warmers sobbed, Robert Grumbine
• Halloween observing rampage (long, rambling), boo
  • Re: Halloween observing rampage (long, rambling), mark_elkington123
• Re: cheap counterwieght ideas, elaich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: cheap counterwieght ideas, thad
    • Re: cheap counterwieght ideas, Tom Rauschenbach
      • Re: cheap counterwieght ideas, thad
• Re: An ideal astronomical moment, Mike
  • Re: An ideal astronomical moment, Jan Owen
    • Re: An ideal astronomical moment, Mike
      • Re: An ideal astronomical moment, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: An ideal astronomical moment, Mike
      • Re: An ideal astronomical moment, FOXZ News Boson
  • Re: An ideal astronomical moment, oriel36
• Re: Binoculars, Howard Lester
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Binoculars, Esmail Bonakdarian
      • Re: Binoculars, Howard Lester
• Anyone Experience the Orion 120ST f/5 Refractor?, Glen Ilacqua
• Orion's XT-12, J
• Re: *** CONTRAST vs RESOLUTION for Telescopes REFRACTORS vs REFLECTORS ***, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: *** CONTRAST vs RESOLUTION for Telescopes REFRACTORS vs REFLECTORS ***, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Re: *** CONTRAST vs RESOLUTION for Telescopes REFRACTORS vs REFLECTORS ***, Chris L Peterson
• New images: Mars and more, Daniele Gasparri
  • Re: New images: Mars and more, Mark Elkington
  • Re: New images: Mars and more, Esmail Bonakdarian
  • Re: New images: Mars and more, FOXZ News Boson
• Re: Solar Imaging with PST and ToUCam, David Nakamoto
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Solar Imaging with PST and ToUCam, canopus56
• Re: Mars dust storm!, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Mars dust storm!, Paul Schlyter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mars dust storm!, George Normandin
    • Re: Mars dust storm!, fcathell
      • Re: Mars dust storm!, George Normandin
• Re: What's inside a Kendrick Dew heater ?, adm
• Re: Astromart again..., Jim Attfield
  • Re: Astromart again..., Mark S. Holden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Astromart again..., Jim Attfield
    • Re: Astromart again..., FOXZ News Boson
  • Re: Astromart again..., Jan Owen
  • Re: Astromart again..., Bill Meyers
    • Re: Astromart again..., Howard Lester
      • Re: Astromart again..., Jan Owen
    • Re: Astromart again..., Jan Owen
  • Re: Astromart again..., FOXZ News Boson
• New Mexico Skies Night One, 2005/10/29, Dave Mitsky
  • Re: New Mexico Skies Night One, 2005/10/29, Tom Polakis
  • Re: New Mexico Skies Night One, 2005/10/29, Greg Crinklaw
    • Re: New Mexico Skies Night One, 2005/10/29, Mark D
    • Re: New Mexico Skies Night One, 2005/10/29, Dave Mitsky
    • Re: New Mexico Skies Night One, 2005/10/29, Dave Mitsky
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New Mexico Skies Night One, 2005/10/29, Dave Mitsky
  • Re: New Mexico Skies Night One, 2005/10/29, Dave Mitsky
• Re: Comparision of green laser pointer and car headlight, avtanski
• Re: Beginner - need help, Nick Roux
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Beginner - need help, g626700-groups
• NASA'S HUBBLE REVEALS POSSIBLE NEW MOONS AROUND PLUTO (STScI-PR05-19), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
  • Re: NASA'S HUBBLE REVEALS POSSIBLE NEW MOONS AROUND PLUTO (STScI-PR05-19), Rich