Re: CMOS vs. CCD -- Link to Article
- From: "David Nakamoto" <res07oeg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 07:03:34 GMT
If they can beat the noise down to CCD levels, keep the sensitivity and dynamic
range, and deliver more pixels, then it would be something.
My two cents,
--- Dave
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pinprick holes in a colorless sky
Let inspired figures of light pass by
The Mighty Light of ten thousand suns
Challenges infinity, and is soon gone
david.nakamoto@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Davoud" <star@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:021220051831574885%star@xxxxxxxxxx
> <http://tinyurl.com/ajavf> by Michael DeLuca, Eastman Kodak --
> Electronic News, 11/30/2005.
>
> I was referred to this article by Bob Piatek, an engineer who is
> developing the "Starfish" CMOS Astro Camera
> <http://www.fishcamp.com/starfish.html>. I saw some prototypes at this
> year's Macintosh Astronomy Workshop
> <http://mrmac.mr.aps.anl.gov/~macastroworkshop/> and then at AstroFest.
> The camera looks promising.
>
> Davoud
>
> --
> usenet *at* davidillig dawt com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CMOS vs. CCD -- Link to Article
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: CMOS vs. CCD -- Link to Article
- References:
- CMOS vs. CCD -- Link to Article
- From: Davoud
- CMOS vs. CCD -- Link to Article
- Prev by Date: Re: Showing off equipment
- Next by Date: Re: RCX400 review ?
- Previous by thread: CMOS vs. CCD -- Link to Article
- Next by thread: Re: CMOS vs. CCD -- Link to Article
- Index(es):