Re: Star of Bethlehem
- From: pausch@xxxxxxx (Paul Schlyter)
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:44:28 GMT
In article <swartzfeger-945003.00052313122005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Jay Swartzfeger <swartzfeger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <dnj8l9$1tl$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> pausch@xxxxxxx (Paul Schlyter) wrote:
>
>> In article <swartzfeger-341EB6.11243211122005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> Jay Swartzfeger <swartzfeger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> In article <dngt95$27ip$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> pausch@xxxxxxx (Paul Schlyter) wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I prefer to not throw pearls before the swine, so to speak, particularly
>>>>> in a place like s.a.a. I think it's safe to assume most here are older,
>>>>> well-educated and rooted in their core beliefs/non-beliefs.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, I do have one problem with a number of Christians: their
>>>> self-righteousness. E.g. the kind you show here when you refer to us
>>>> non-believers as "swine" ....
>>>
>>> That's why I said 'so to speak' -- I was simply quoting a scripture that
>>> basically means don't bother people with something they clearly do not
>>> want to hear.
>>
>> ...and it also implies that those who don't want to hear it are somehow
>> inferior .... and will end up in hell, tortured forever..... nice
>> scriptures, eh? :-)
>
> <shrug> take it up with Jesus, he said it. :)
....or so the legend says... :-) ...but even if Jesus did say so, it's
up to each one of us whether we want to accept it or not. To invoke fear
is a very old trick to gain power over uneducated people.
Finally, it is kind'a hard to discuss with someone who've been dead
for almost 2000 years, isn't it?
> In context, his comments made sense considering he was addressing an
> uneducated crowd and using heavy allegory.
Context? You mean the Word Of God isn't eternal and unchanging, as a
number of Christians claim? <g>
Anyway, if you wanted to transfer this into the contemporary context instead,
how would you want to express it?
> Of course, I don't want to disabuse you of the notion of of Christians
> being self-righteous bible thumpers that read hate-filled scriptures, so
> whatever. ;)
Some are -- and I think you agee with me on that, don't you?
> I personally find pigs 1) cute and 2) tasty, so I take no offense at the
> use of the term swine.
So if someone wanted to devour you for dinner, you'd consider that a
compliment?
> Ok, this 'self-righteous' Christian is bowing out of this thread because
> religion doesn't belong in s.a.a. and I need to pour myself a third pint
> of russian imperial stout...
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se
WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Star of Bethlehem
- From: Jay Swartzfeger
- Re: Star of Bethlehem
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: Star of Bethlehem
- References:
- Star of Bethlehem
- From: johnboy
- Re: Star of Bethlehem
- From: Jay Swartzfeger
- Re: Star of Bethlehem
- From: Paul Schlyter
- Re: Star of Bethlehem
- From: Jay Swartzfeger
- Star of Bethlehem
- Prev by Date: Re: A Consequence of Improper Science Lessons
- Next by Date: Re: Star of Bethlehem
- Previous by thread: Re: Star of Bethlehem
- Next by thread: Re: Star of Bethlehem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|