Re: They "may" build great cars, but.....
- From: Rich <none@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:37:39 -0500
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 01:33:35 GMT, Phil Wheeler <w6tuh-ng7@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Rich wrote:
>>
>> If your problem is with some copyright issue, the newsletter is
>> provided to anyone, free of charge. If it's bandwidth, then I'd
>> say it's time to get off dial-up.
>>
>
>
>No. My problem is that it adds nothing to the newsgroup, since anyone
>can go and get it for free if they want to read it. If you post copied
>stuff to make some added-value statement or point, fine. But just
>copying someones work and posting it here is a real drag!
I've heard this before and usually, someone else pipes up that most
people don't see everything that they might be interested in
and would have no problem with it.
Why not just avoid the post anyway? I still fail to see how you are
inconvenienced in any major way. I think that amateur astronomy is
often narrowly construed as simply using a telescope to see things
when it can mean taking an interest in any facet of astronomy from
an amateur level.
-Rich
.
- References:
- They "may" build great cars, but.....
- From: Rich
- Re: They "may" build great cars, but.....
- From: md
- Re: They "may" build great cars, but.....
- From: George
- Re: They "may" build great cars, but.....
- From: md
- Re: They "may" build great cars, but.....
- From: Phil Wheeler
- Re: They "may" build great cars, but.....
- From: Rich
- Re: They "may" build great cars, but.....
- From: Phil Wheeler
- They "may" build great cars, but.....
- Prev by Date: Re: Mt.Wilson
- Next by Date: Sky and Tel and their "plastic" bags
- Previous by thread: Re: They "may" build great cars, but.....
- Next by thread: Re: They "may" build great cars, but.....
- Index(es):