Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
- From: "RMOLLISE" <rmollise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Jan 2006 02:42:04 -0800
KLing Oar wrote:
> who.............................................................................................................cares.
>
You must, or you wouldn't have typed all those ......s ;-)
Peace,
Rod Mollise
Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_
Like SCTs and MCTs?
Join the SCT User Mailing List.
<http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/sct-user>
============================
See my home page at
<http://skywatch.brainiac.com/astroland/index.htm>
for further details!
============================
For Uncle Rod's Astro Blog See:
<http://journals.aol.com/rmollise/UncleRodsAstroBlog/>
.
- References:
- "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
- From: Joe Bergeron
- Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
- From: Jan Owen
- Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
- From: Jan Owen
- Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
- From: KLing Oar
- "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
- Prev by Date: Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
- Next by Date: Re: remote capture
- Previous by thread: Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
- Next by thread: Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
