Re: help me understand how a Mac is virtually immune to viruses?



Beryl Gormley:
> After my initial question about a computer switch to Mac, I got to thinking
> about some of my colleagues at work mentioning that a Mac is virtually
> immune to Win viruses. I know this may be elementary (my dear Watson), but
> how is this so? Wouldn't the Mac be using the same programs for Win surfing
> (Firefox, for example) and be receiving the same spyware and other crap
> downloaded in the system as on the Win environment?

To the last part: Yes, the Mac user might download a virus or other
malware, but those are written to run under Windows, and they can't be
installed and run under the Mac OS. As a webmaster who receives lots of
mail from non-geek Windows users, (my web sites aren't computer
related) I receive e-mails with viruses attached every day. I also
receive the occasional virus from Windows experts. No big thing.

Conventional wisdom is that the reason no one has successfully
penetrated Mac OS X is that nobody is trying because nobody (meaning
only about 5% of users) uses Macs. If you consider who the Mac users
are, however <http://www.annapolisappleslice.com/nobody.html>, in order
to believe that you would have to believe that *no one* wants to hack
the movie industry, the television industry, the publishing industry
<http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,114464,00.asp>, NASA, the
Space Telescope Science Institute, the Human Genome Project
<http://www.macworld.com/news/2005/02/28/business/index.php> the FBI,
the U.S. Army <http://tfbbs.com/machackers.html>, certain "other"
government agencies, Microsoft (yes, they have a bunch of Macs), the
iTunes Music Store, or Apple itself.

The real reason the Mac OS hasn't been penetrated is that no one has
yet found a way to do so. There have been and continue to be vast
numbers of attacks against Mac networks -- even my own little six-Mac
network. One problem attackers have is that it requires user
intervention to install software on a Mac.

Having said that, I don't think that Mac users should be too smug; I
expect that someone, some day, will find a way to penetrate the Mac OS.
If it's a virus it could be bad, because practically no one has
anti-virus software on their Macs. Still, if and when that happens
we'll be hundreds of millions of penetrations behind Windows. Just one
more way Windows leads the Mac!

Davoud

--
usenet *at* davidillig dawt com
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: IE for Mac...
    ... Today's Mac is nothing more than yet another UNIX shell. ... Apple lacked the skills to create a real OS ... win for Mac users since for the first time they got real memory ... Windows Vista will not run on many older computers, ...
    (rec.food.cooking)
  • Cyberspeak: Boot Camp Will Start Exodus to Windows
    ... Boot Camp -- software that allows Windows XP to be installed on three ... The idea is that people who prefer the Mac but need to use ... it's more likely to convince Mac users to ...
    (comp.dcom.telecom)
  • Re: DENIAL
    ... Three or four mac users claimed you got a virus form visiting Gay Porn ... It was dismissed when Dave said he didn't visit porn sites ... It was suggested or implied by four different experienced mac users. ... What would constitute a 'qualified Windows user'? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: DENIAL
    ... "Thank you, Mayor"? ... Three or four mac users claimed you got a virus form visiting Gay Porn ... One Windows user claimed you have "Brain Strain". ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: DENIAL
    ... "I don't view porn in any case (certainly not on my ... Three or four mac users claimed you got a virus form visiting Gay Porn ... It was suggested or implied by four different experienced mac users. ... I am a qualified Windows user. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)