Re: Stupid question about magnification
- From: "nick" <svla@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Jan 2006 09:22:28 -0800
Chris L Peterson wrote:
>
> To an astronomer, "magnification" is useful to describe the factor by
> which an object appears larger through an instrument compared with its
> size to the naked eye. An objective has no such value.
Interesting. And at the same time, you're stating:
> The magnification of a 500mm objective and a particular EP will be one
> fourth the magnification of a 2000mm objective with the same EP.
Isn't it directly contradicting?
Vlad
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stupid question about magnification
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Stupid question about magnification
- References:
- Stupid question about magnification
- From: Cerdic
- Re: Stupid question about magnification
- From: nick
- Re: Stupid question about magnification
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Stupid question about magnification
- From: nick
- Re: Stupid question about magnification
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: Stupid question about magnification
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Stupid question about magnification
- Prev by Date: Re: Stupid question about magnification
- Next by Date: Re: The myserious star has been located
- Previous by thread: Re: Stupid question about magnification
- Next by thread: Re: Stupid question about magnification
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|