Re: How many photons in one airy disc?
- From: Chris L Peterson <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 01:07:29 GMT
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:48:43 -0700, Jürgen Appel
<jappel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>What you probably mean is, that a photon does not have to be localized.
I agree with that, but it isn't what I meant, which was that there is no
such thing as a "ray" consisting of a stream of photons, because no two
photons will be in exactly the same path. I suppose you could create
some definition of ray that included a non-zero width (radius), and the
resulting finite volume could be seen as containing a stream of photons.
But I can't think of any particularly useful reason for doing that.
My sense was that the OP was viewing a ray as if it were some sort of
physical entity.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How many photons in one airy disc?
- From: EP Guy
- Re: How many photons in one airy disc?
- From: jayz
- Re: How many photons in one airy disc?
- Prev by Date: Re: Uncle Rod Ain't Exactly a Refractor Kind of Guy...BUT...
- Next by Date: Re: Saturn with M44 photos?
- Previous by thread: How much dec drift, field rot, and periodic error allowable?
- Next by thread: Re: How many photons in one airy disc?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading