Re: Refractors vs. binoculars
- From: "laura halliday" <marsgal42@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Feb 2006 07:34:33 -0800
Doink <skyman1...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
There aren't 7 stars in the Trapezium. There are 6
and the other 2 (from the usual 4) are pretty rough.
I was curious, so I took my Orion 20x80s out to the
back yard and had a look. The Trapezium was clearly
(but just barely) three stars, with a suggestion of a
4th. I've seen the E and F components, but it took an
8" and dark skies to do so.
The Pleiades were the usual religious experience,
M41 and M44 weren't too shabby, and Saturn was
a tiny yellow oval...
These binoculars are obviously achromats, but good
ones. I could see a little bit of false colour on Sirius and
the Moon, but that was about it.
Laura Halliday VE7LDH "Que les nuages soient notre
Grid: CN89mg pied a terre..."
ICBM: 49 16.05 N 122 56.92 W - Hospital/Shafte
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Refractors vs. binoculars
- From: Ioannis
- Re: Refractors vs. binoculars
- References:
- Refractors vs. binoculars
- From: Tom Rauschenbach
- Re: Refractors vs. binoculars
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: Refractors vs. binoculars
- From: Tom Rauschenbach
- Re: Refractors vs. binoculars
- From: Doink
- Refractors vs. binoculars
- Prev by Date: Re: Can I see any spiral galaxies with an etx-60at ?
- Next by Date: Re: Grinding a mirror vs buying complete
- Previous by thread: Re: Refractors vs. binoculars
- Next by thread: Re: Refractors vs. binoculars
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|