Re: Messier Marathon Object Ordering (?)
- From: brian@xxxxxxx (Brian Tung)
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Tom Polakis wrote:
Even though it's up quite a bit higher, M33 can pose a challenge in
murky or light-polluted sites thanks to its low surface brightness.
The same can be said for M110 (he said, refusing to participate in an
argument over whether there are 109 or 110 objects).
Whether or not we believe that M102 should be counted as distinct from
M101, we still call M103 through M110 by the same name! :)
--
Brian Tung <brian@xxxxxxx>
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html
(Location of these pages soon to change. Stay tuned for updates.)
.
- References:
- Messier Marathon Object Ordering (?)
- From: Stephen Paul
- Re: Messier Marathon Object Ordering (?)
- From: Greg Crinklaw
- Re: Messier Marathon Object Ordering (?)
- From: Tom Polakis
- Messier Marathon Object Ordering (?)
- Prev by Date: Re: Messier Marathon Object Ordering (?)
- Next by Date: Re: All-Arizona Messier Marathon March 25-26
- Previous by thread: Re: Messier Marathon Object Ordering (?)
- Next by thread: Re: Messier Marathon Object Ordering (?)
- Index(es):