Re: SAA Drivel
- From: "RMOLLISE" <rmollise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Apr 2006 12:18:31 -0700
You practice astrophotography and that does not constitute
observational astronomy.Your sole purpose is making objects appear
bigger hence that does not constitute observational astronomy never
mind the perceptual astronomy of Kepler and Copernicus.
Hi Oriole:
I said, very plainly, _amateur astronomy_...which has everything to do
with astrophotography and nothing at all to do with the folderoll and
fiddle-dee-dee you post here. Why don't you also do us a favor and trot
on off to alt.astronomy or sci.astro where you can share your juvenile
foolishness with Ed Conrad, Nancy Lieder, Brad Guth and the rest of
your like-minded colleagues?
Peace,
Rod Mollise
Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_
<http://skywatch.brainiac.com/astroland/index.htm>
Like SCTs and MCTs?
Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers:
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sct-user>
See: <http://journals.aol.com/rmollise/UncleRodsAstroBlog/>
For Uncle Rod's Astro Blog.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SAA Drivel
- From: oriel36
- Re: SAA Drivel
- References:
- Re: SAA Drivel
- From: RMOLLISE
- Re: SAA Drivel
- From: oriel36
- Re: SAA Drivel
- Prev by Date: Re: Off Topic Posts (new yahoo group)
- Next by Date: Re: SAA Drivel
- Previous by thread: Re: This guy puts me to sleep!
- Next by thread: Re: SAA Drivel
- Index(es):