Re: Stephen Paul: Please
- From: "Doink" <skyman102a@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:51:02 -0700
How much memory card are you "consuming" for a 3-5 minute exposure? Do you
shoot those at full resolution or back it down to 800X600 or something?
I'm thinking about a new camera because I like having a warranty on an item
as complex as this...If I bought a $400 CAMERA on ebay loaded with hot
pixels there wouldn't be much to do...what's the 350D? Better?
Thanks for the help. I've struggled with this one a long time...
Doink
"Stephen Paul" <smarshallpaul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:z_mdnQ_hos91B9DZRVn-sg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Doink wrote:
Greetings...
I'm trying to snag a 300D and would like your thoughts on the subject.
I've seen images that are exactly what I'm looking for from this
camera---
But...is there something newer, better or???? Should I still go for a
300D? I'd like your thoughts before I plunk $500 for a camera...
Also, which adapters did you get---just a T-ring and nose piece?
Regards and thanks...
Doink
I have no problem recommending the 300D. Personally, if I were going to
spend more than the cost of a used 300D, I'd go all out and get a full
blown astro-CCD camera.
You'll need a T-Ring which you can get almost anywhere (check
ScopeStuff??). This is a bayonet style adapter that locks into the lens
position on the camera, with threads to mate to a T-adapter. T-adapters
come in SCT style, and nosepiece style. Some scopes include a T-adapter
thread on the outside rim of the 1.25" eyepiece adapter.
It takes a while to get this all straightened out, but I'd encourage you
to go for it. 300D's are an excellent value right now.
-Stephen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stephen Paul: Please
- From: Stephen Paul
- Re: Stephen Paul: Please
- From: Phil Wheeler
- Re: Stephen Paul: Please
- From: Uncle Bob
- Re: Stephen Paul: Please
- References:
- Stephen Paul: Please
- From: Doink
- Re: Stephen Paul: Please
- From: Stephen Paul
- Stephen Paul: Please
- Prev by Date: Re: Stephen Paul: Please
- Next by Date: Re: Why Questars are so great
- Previous by thread: Re: Stephen Paul: Please
- Next by thread: Re: Stephen Paul: Please
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|