Re: Last Question...Please
- From: "Doink" <skyman102a@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:24:58 -0700
What's the 350 XT do that the 300D doesn't?
Worth the difference? The day stuff isn't important to me...
Doink
"Stephen Paul" <smarshallpaul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:WrqdnfMswZRcRdPZnZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Doink wrote:
That's why I was considering other models...you bag the others I
mentioned for a LOT less. I'm struggling with "do I need a $700-800
camera to do what I want?
I think the answer to that is yep, pretty much.
I just took a look at the others you listed and they're all permanent lens
systems (consumer digital). The (pro-sumer) digital SLRs those companies
offer are also around $800 for the low end models at 8MP.
That's why I went with a used 300D. :-)
The non SLR style cameras can only be used afocally. If all you want is a
family photo camera, then the consumer cameras are fine, but for anything
beyond that you need a pro-sumer. Thankfully they are making these for us
hobbyists. Otherwise we'd have to bite the bullet and get a professional
cla$$ camera.
In the end, if you wanna play, you gotta pay. ;-)
I still say a 12 month to 18 month old 300D is a good value at around
$400. However, after a Google search, I see that the 350XT can be had for
as little as $650 after rebate.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Question...Please
- From: Stephen Paul
- Re: Last Question...Please
- References:
- Stephen Paul: Please
- From: Doink
- Re: Stephen Paul: Please
- From: Stephen Paul
- Re: Stephen Paul: Please
- From: Doink
- Re: Stephen Paul: Please
- From: Stephen Paul
- Last Question...Please
- From: Doink
- Re: Last Question...Please
- From: Stephen Paul
- Re: Last Question...Please
- From: Doink
- Re: Last Question...Please
- From: Stephen Paul
- Stephen Paul: Please
- Prev by Date: Re: Last Question...Please
- Next by Date: Re: Cheap imaging?
- Previous by thread: Re: Last Question...Please
- Next by thread: Re: Last Question...Please
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|