Re: Area 51
- From: pausch@xxxxxxx (Paul Schlyter)
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 20:14:10 GMT
In article <e4a5dl$40o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Robin Wier <rwier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
""Anders Eklvf"" <andekl_no@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1hfcb4a.nw20x1rlai5kN%andekl_no@xxxxxxxxxxxx
..............................................................................................................................................................
That is one part I find problematic. What does it mean if I - at best an
agnostic - was obliged to swear on the Bible?
To me it would mean absolutely nothing, except that I would feel like a
hypocrite. ................................................
How does an antheist swear the oath in court ? Or a moslem, for that
matter - the Quran? (You don't see that in L.A. law :-))
Swearing an oath is a legal procedure, not a spiritual, religious, or
ethical event. Failure to respond truthfully (after swearing) is the
definition of perjury.
Don't the courts have some alternate procedure for non-believers (or
for believers whose holy scriptures are unavailable at the court), where
the witness swears to tell the truth, without involving any bible or
god? That procedure would be non-religious, but still imply the same
legal obligation.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at stockholm dot bostream dot se
WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Area 51
- From: DT
- Re: Area 51
- References:
- Re: Area 51
- From: AM
- Re: Area 51
- From: Anders Eklöf
- Re: Area 51
- From: Robin Wier
- Re: Area 51
- Prev by Date: Re: How to disassemble eyepiece of binocular
- Next by Date: Re: OT- New York New York
- Previous by thread: Re: Area 51
- Next by thread: Re: Area 51
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|