Re: Opinions sought Meade RC/Russian Mak
- From: "RMOLLISE" <rmollise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 May 2006 23:40:40 -0700
Doink wrote:
I'm finding as I gain experience, I prefer detail to quantity. My MK-67
shows a lot more detail than a C-8---well collimated C-8 too.
Hi:
If that's your experience, more power to ya. It's not been mine,
however.
Peace,
Rod Mollise
Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_
and _The Urban Astronomer's Guide_
Like SCTs and MCTs?
Join the SCT User Mailing List.
<http://www.groups.yahoo.com/group/sct-user>
See my home page at
<http://skywatch.brainiac.com/astroland/index.htm>
for further info
For Uncle Rod's Astro Blog See:
<http://journals.aol.com/rmollise/UncleRodsAstroBlog/>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Opinions sought Meade RC/Russian Mak
- From: Doink
- Re: Opinions sought Meade RC/Russian Mak
- References:
- Opinions sought Meade RC/Russian Mak
- From: Doink
- Re: Opinions sought Meade RC/Russian Mak
- From: RMOLLISE
- Re: Opinions sought Meade RC/Russian Mak
- From: Doink
- Opinions sought Meade RC/Russian Mak
- Prev by Date: Re: Whats with my Dec Drive? - LX50
- Next by Date: Re: Opinions sought Meade RC/Russian Mak
- Previous by thread: Re: Opinions sought Meade RC/Russian Mak
- Next by thread: Re: Opinions sought Meade RC/Russian Mak
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|