Re: 911 sun angle question


" George" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:LbqdnTZHNNmGreDZnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Michal" <mich@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:FJ7fg.148$I61.81@xxxxxxxxxxx


Those who believe this load of crap have not seen a large explosion of
JP-1 fuel, and have no idea what they are talking about.

George


Oh, and you do?? How much energy can possibly be produced to vaporize?
That's what you are implying...vaporization...it would take the confined
energy of a
starship phaser to vaporize a 757...

Actually, I do. I've worked as an OSHA certified HAZMAT worker and HAZMAT
emergency response site manager for 16 years, much of that time as a
contractor for the petroleum industry. And no it certainly wouldn't take
such a science fiction amount of energy to vaporize a 757, because first
of all, the plane wasn't vaporized - it disintigrated in the impact.
Secondly, much of the resulting debris was consumed in the fire.

Much of that airplane is aluminum and plastic. Take an aluminum can,
place it into a very hot camp fire, and watch it be consumed before your
very eyes. Aluminum oxydizes rapidly in the presence of atmospheric air
(in fact, when it was first identified as an element, it was kept in a
sealed, airtight container for fear that it would completely oxydize).
The only reason why it doesn't completely oxydize while sitting in air is
because the oxydation process rapidly forms a layer of AlO2 on the
surface, which protects it from further oxydation. In a large inferno
such as occurred in the after math of the Pentagon attack, the aluminum
would be consumed rapidly. Oh, and by the way, the 757 did not completely
vaporize. Any plane flying at nearly full speed and striking a hardened
building such as the Pentagon is going to disintegrate practically on
impact. Much of what is left will be consumed in the fire. However,
there were plenty of small parts left in the wreckage of the Pentagon. Of
course, the plastic was consumed as well.

But don't let the facts stop you from making a complete ass our of
yourself. If you had taken some science courses instead of spending all
your time at political rallies when you went to school (and on conspiracy
theory web sites as an immature adult), you might actually have learned
something about chemistry, physics, and fuel explosions.

George

You're grasping at straws. The FBI even confiscated all security video from
other buildings that caught everything and
only showed the public that pathetic piece of footage.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 911 sun angle question
    ... Those who believe this load of crap have not seen a large explosion of ... JP-1 fuel, and have no idea what they are talking about. ... How much energy can possibly be produced to vaporize? ... Much of that airplane is aluminum and plastic. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: 911 sun angle question
    ... Those who believe this load of crap have not seen a large explosion of ... JP-1 fuel, and have no idea what they are talking about. ... How much energy can possibly be produced to vaporize? ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: 911 sun angle question
    ... Those who believe this load of crap have not seen a large explosion of ... JP-1 fuel, and have no idea what they are talking about. ... How much energy can possibly be produced to vaporize? ... facts that were witnessed by hundreds of people, and all facts that can be ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: 911 sun angle question
    ... Those who believe this load of crap have not seen a large explosion of ... How much energy can possibly be produced to vaporize? ... what the energetics of the transcontinental fueled flights delivered it ... that the fate of a steel framed building with a roughly 1GW fire ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: 911 sun angle question
    ... JP-1 fuel, and have no idea what they are talking about. ... How much energy can possibly be produced to vaporize? ... Aluminum is very reactive. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)