sci.astro.amateur

• Date Index

---

• Solar Obs. 30/6/06, Willie R . Meghar
• Coloured objects list?, jtaylor
  • Re: Coloured objects list?, William Hamblen
  • Re: Coloured objects list?, Brian Tung
    • Re: Coloured objects list?, Ioannis
      • Re: Coloured objects list?, Brian Tung
    • Re: Coloured objects list?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: OT:Something Good for Once, Stuart Chapman
• Clouds, The Hammered Astronomer
  • Re: Clouds, Fuzzy_Stars
    • Re: Clouds, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Clouds, Fuzzy_Stars
• help with reference books list, Brian Tung
  • Re: help with reference books list, laura halliday
    • Re: help with reference books list, LarryG
    • Re: help with reference books list, John Nichols
      • Re: help with reference books list, Brian Tung
  • Re: help with reference books list, oriel36
  • Re: help with reference books list, Shelldigger
• Multiple bogus Jovian moons, William C. Keel
  • Re: Multiple bogus Jovian moons, Doink
• Finding Asteroid 2004 XP14, Robert Sheaffer
  • Re: Finding Asteroid 2004 XP14, Robert Sheaffer
• And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., Rich
  • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., eddie
    • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., Rich
      • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., George
  • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., Fuzzy_Stars
  • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., dk
    • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., Brian Tung
      • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., dk
      • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., Brian Tung
      • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., dk
      • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., Brian Tung
      • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., George
• Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
    • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
    • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Dennis Woos
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Dennis Woos
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Dan McKenna
    • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Dan McKenna
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, William Hamblen
    • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, William Hamblen
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Rich
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
    • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Dennis Woos
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Dennis Woos
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
• Observations: 29/6/06, Willie R . Meghar
  • Re: Observations: 29/6/06, Dennis Woos
    • Re: Observations: 29/6/06, Dennis Woos
      • Re: Observations: 29/6/06, Brian Tung
      • Re: Observations: 29/6/06, Dennis Woos
      • Re: Observations: 29/6/06, Marty
    • Re: Observations: 29/6/06, Willie R . Meghar
  • Re: Observations: 29/6/06, Skylook123
  • Re: Observations: 29/6/06, Terry B
• what was the trigger?, Brian Tung
  • Re: what was the trigger?, David Nakamoto
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: what was the trigger?, Anonymous AtWork
      • Re: what was the trigger?, Pieter Litchfield
      • Re: what was the trigger?, Anonymous AtWork
      • Re: what was the trigger?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: what was the trigger?, Marty
      • Re: what was the trigger?, Brian Tung
  • Re: what was the trigger?, John Banister
    • Re: what was the trigger?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: what was the trigger?, Pieter Litchfield
      • Re: what was the trigger?, Brian Tung
  • Re: what was the trigger?, John Banister
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Tom Rauschenbach
    • Re: what was the trigger?, Brian Tung
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Michael McCulloch
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Curtis Croulet
  • Re: what was the trigger?, dk
  • Re: what was the trigger?, laura halliday
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Bill Owen
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Howard Lester
  • Re: what was the trigger?, johnschiap
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Willie R . Meghar
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Paul S. Walsh
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Jan Owen
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Rick Evans
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Florian
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Skylook123
    • Re: what was the trigger?, Brian Tung
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Mike Kreuzer
  • Re: what was the trigger?, AM
    • Re: what was the trigger?, whowell
• The Ordeal, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: The Ordeal, JW
  • Re: The Ordeal, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: The Ordeal, Willie R . Meghar
    • Re: The Ordeal, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: The Ordeal, Willie R . Meghar
      • Re: The Ordeal, The Hammered Astronomer
      • Re: The Ordeal, Fuzzy_Stars
      • Re: The Ordeal, Sam Wormley
      • Re: The Ordeal, The Hammered Astronomer
  • Re: The Ordeal, Dennis Woos
• "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, W. Watson
  • Re: "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, Brian Tung
  • Re: "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, canopus56
    • Re: "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, W. Watson
      • Re: "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, canopus56
      • Re: "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, canopus56
      • Re: "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, Odysseus
  • Re: "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, Dennis Woos
    • Re: "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, canopus56
      • Re: "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, Marty
      • Re: "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, Brian Tung
      • Re: "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, Marty
      • Re: "Cat's Eyes" and Other Odd Asterisms, Shawn
• More Gore accuracy!, Procellerum
  • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Martin R. Howell
    • Re: More Gore accuracy!, W. Watson
  • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Sam Wormley
  • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Doink
    • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Procellerum
    • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Fuzzy_Stars
    • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Rick Evans
  • Re: More Gore accuracy!, JW
  • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Fuzzy_Stars
    • Re: More Gore accuracy!, rpasken
      • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Fuzzy_Stars
      • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Ernie Dunbar
      • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Fuzzy_Stars
      • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Procellerum
  • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Rich
    • Re: More Gore accuracy!, The Hammered Astronomer
      • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Fuzzy_Stars
• Great TELESCOPE For Sale: Orion StarMax 127mm Scope + Tripod + Lenses + More, Mr Shipwreck
• Space Weather News for June 28, 2006, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Space Weather News for June 28, 2006, Nick V
  • Re: Space Weather News for June 28, 2006, allisonki
• another physics article: Kepler to Newton, Brian Tung
  • Message not available
    • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, Brian Tung
  • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Message not available
    • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, oriel36
  • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, JW
  • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, oriel36
    • Message not available
      • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, oriel36
      • Message not available
      • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, oriel36
      • Message not available
      • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, oriel36
  • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, Anonymous AtWork
    • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, Brian Tung
      • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, oriel36
      • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, Klauss Schroder
      • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, Brian Tung
      • Re: another physics article: Kepler to Newton, oriel36
    • Re: what was the trigger?, Ioannis
• AstroStuff down?, Len Philpot
  • Message not available
    • Re: AstroStuff down?, Len Philpot
  • Re: AstroStuff down?, JW
• Can I turn a Meade 8x50 Straight through into a Right-Angle finder?, rdeol85@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Can I turn a Meade 8x50 Straight through into a Right-Angle finder?, RMOLLISE
  • Re: Can I turn a Meade 8x50 Straight through into a Right-Angle finder?, Willie R . Meghar
  • Re: Can I turn a Meade 8x50 Straight through into a Right-Angle finder?, William Hamblen
    • Re: Can I turn a Meade 8x50 Straight through into a Right-Angle finder?, rdeol85@xxxxxxxxx
• Hubble Space Telescope Status Report, Klaatu
• Deep Sky Reiseatlas, gubbenimanen
  • Re: Deep Sky Reiseatlas, Len Philpot
    • Re: Deep Sky Reiseatlas, gubbenimanen
• Missed the GRS, Anonymous AtWork
  • Message not available
    • Re: Missed the GRS, Anonymous AtWork
      • Re: Missed the GRS, Dennis Woos
      • Re: Missed the GRS, Anonymous AtWork
      • Re: Missed the GRS, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Re: Missed the GRS, Anonymous AtWork
      • Message not available
      • Re: Missed the GRS, Martin R. Howell
      • Too much Rebel Yell (nothing personal, Rod) was Re: Missed the GRS (was: Missed the GRS), Martin R. Howell
      • Re: Too much Rebel Yell (nothing personal, Rod) was Re: Missed the GRS, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: Missed the GRS, AM
      • Message not available
      • Re: Missed the GRS, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Re: Missed the GRS, JW
  • Re: Missed the GRS, Doink
    • Re: Missed the GRS, Anonymous AtWork
  • Re: Missed the GRS, Joe S.
  • Re: Missed the GRS, Willie R . Meghar
  • Re: Missed the GRS, William Hamblen
  • Re: Missed the GRS, David Nakamoto
  • Re: Missed the GRS, Don't Be Evil
• Favorite Doubles < 2", Dennis Woos
  • Re: Favorite Doubles < 2", Brian Tung
    • Re: Favorite Doubles < 2", Dennis Woos
      • Re: Favorite Doubles < 2", canopus56
      • Re: Favorite Doubles < 2", JW
      • Re: Favorite Doubles < 2", Dennis Woos
• AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE'S MOVIE, Fuzzy_Stars
  • Don't feed the trolls!, Don't Be Evil
    • Re: Don't feed the trolls!, Fuzzy_Stars
    • Re: Don't feed the trolls!, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE'S MOVIE, Procellerum
    • Re: AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE'S MOVIE, Fuzzy_Stars
    • Re: AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE'S MOVIE, Fuzzy_Stars
      • Re: AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE'S MOVIE, rpasken
      • Re: AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE'S MOVIE, Fuzzy_Stars
      • Re: AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE'S MOVIE, rpasken
      • Re: AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE'S MOVIE, Fuzzy_Stars
      • Re: AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE'S MOVIE, rpasken
      • Re: AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE'S MOVIE, Fuzzy_Stars
• Cartes du Ciel Version 3 beta 0.1.0, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Cartes du Ciel Version 3 beta 0.1.0, Procellerum
  • Re: Cartes du Ciel Version 3 beta 0.1.0, delyan
    • Re: Cartes du Ciel Version 3 beta 0.1.0, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Cartes du Ciel Version 3 beta 0.1.0, AM
• S&T C-6 Review, Doink
  • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Alan French
    • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Doink
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Brian Tung
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, rat ~( );>
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Brian Tung
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Tom Royer
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Don't Be Evil
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Ed T
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Alan French
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Brian Tung
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Alan French
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Brian Tung
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Alan French
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Doink
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Brian Tung
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Doink
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Brian Tung
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Doink
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, starburst
  • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Shelldigger
    • Re: S&T C-6 Review, AM
    • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Alan French
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Shelldigger
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, daveponder
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Brian Tung
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Bob Schmall
    • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Bob Schmall
      • Re: S&T C-6 Review, Shelldigger
• Jovian moon observation, Tom Rauschenbach
  • Re: Jovian moon observation, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Jovian moon observation, Alan French
  • Re: Jovian moon observation, Dave Jessie
  • Re: Jovian moon observation, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: Jovian moon observation, William Hamblen
  • Re: Jovian moon observation, BoycottAI
  • Re: Jovian moon observation, Tom Rauschenbach
    • Re: Jovian moon observation, Dave Jessie
    • Re: Jovian moon observation, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Re: Jovian moon observation, Odysseus
• GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Seven, Skylook123
  • Re: GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Seven, Willie R . Meghar
    • Re: GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Seven, Skylook123
      • Re: GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Seven, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Seven, Skylook123
      • Re: GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Seven, Morris Jones
      • Re: GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Seven, Skylook123
• GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Six, Skylook123
• GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Five, Skylook123
• GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Four, Skylook123
• GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Three, Skylook123
• GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Two, Skylook123
• GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_One, Skylook123
• Re: YUK, Mark F.
• Moon phases, goodnigh
  • Re: Moon phases, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Moon phases, goodnigh
      • Re: Moon phases, Sam Wormley
• DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Willie R . Meghar
  • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Brian Tung
    • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Willie R . Meghar
      • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Brian Tung
  • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Shawn
    • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Brian Tung
      • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, John Nichols
      • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, John Banister
      • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Brian Tung
      • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, AM
    • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Howard Lester
    • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Willie R . Meghar
      • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Shawn
  • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, John Nichols
  • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Ioannis
  • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Alan French
    • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Shawn
      • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Brian Tung
    • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, Jim
  • Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly Visitation, tony_flanders
• Re: Republican *Database* Against Liberals, MAT
• Re: Telescope, nytecam
  • Message not available
    • Re: Telescope, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Telescope, Roger Hamlett
• mag 11 near-earth asteriod 2004 XP14 passage 7/3/2006 6UTC-9UTC, canopus56
• AP Refractors, Ed Majden
  • Re: AP Refractors, Alan French
    • Re: AP Refractors, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AP Refractors, Alan French
      • Re: AP Refractors, vahe240d
      • Re: AP Refractors, dan chaffee
      • Re: AP Refractors, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AP Refractors, William Hamblen
      • Re: AP Refractors, decaf
    • Re: AP Refractors, vahe240d
      • Re: AP Refractors, Alan French
      • Re: AP Refractors, stevethornton
  • Re: AP Refractors, rat ~( );>
    • Re: AP Refractors, vahe240d
      • Re: AP Refractors, mrgrytt
      • Re: AP Refractors, vahe240d
      • Re: AP Refractors, mrgrytt
      • Re: AP Refractors, JW
• Warm Fire north of Grand Canyon, Morris Jones
• New Book: Modern Dictionary of Astronomy and Space Technology: Comprehensive and Illustrated Encyclopaedic Dictionary, an
• Surface Brightness of Deep-Sky Objects Measured with a Digital Camera, Sam Wormley
• Wobble and weather, Procellarum
  • Re: Wobble and weather, oriel36
• Pale swirls on the surface of the Moon, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Pale swirls on the surface of the Moon, Procellarum
  • Re: Pale swirls on the surface of the Moon, Procellarum
  • Re: Pale swirls on the surface of the Moon, Confused
• Washington Double Star Catalog?, Doink
  • Re: Washington Double Star Catalog?, Alan French
    • Re: Washington Double Star Catalog?, canopus56
    • Re: Washington Double Star Catalog?, Doink
• Hey what happen to small superplanetary mirrors?, Mean Mr Mustard
  • Re: Hey what happen to small superplanetary mirrors?, Alan French
  • Re: Hey what happen to small superplanetary mirrors?, Shelldigger
  • Re: Hey what happen to small superplanetary mirrors?, Ed T
    • Re: Hey what happen to small superplanetary mirrors?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Hey what happen to small superplanetary mirrors?, Edward Erbeck
      • Re: Hey what happen to small superplanetary mirrors?, Howard Lester
  • Re: Hey what happen to small superplanetary mirrors?, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Re: Hey what happen to small superplanetary mirrors?, Confused
      • Re: Hey what happen to small superplanetary mirrors?, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: Hey what happen to small superplanetary mirrors?, Bob May
    • Re: Hey what happen to small superplanetary mirrors?, Alan French
• Avoid Mercury System..., Doink
  • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., Davoud
    • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., Doink
      • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., Davoud
      • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., Doink
      • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., RMOLLISE
      • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., Doink
  • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., deb and todd
    • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., RichIsaTroll
      • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., Doink
      • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., RichIsaTroll
      • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., RichIsaTroll
      • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., Doink
      • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., RichIsaTroll
    • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., Doink
  • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., Confused
    • Re: Avoid Mercury System..., Doink
• 26 June 2006 Obs. Report, Willie R . Meghar
• Moderator for this group?, njrusty
  • Re: Moderator for this group?, Mad
  • Re: Moderator for this group?, Sam Wormley
  • Message not available
    • Re: Moderator for this group?, Fuzzy_Stars
  • Re: Moderator for this group?, Chris L Peterson
  • Message not available
    • Re: [OT] Moderator for this group?, Chris L Peterson
      • Message not available
      • Re: [OT] Moderator for this group?, Chris L Peterson
      • Message not available
      • Re: [OT] Moderator for this group?, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Moderator for this group?, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Moderator for this group?, Doink
  • Re: Moderator for this group?, LarryG
  • Re: Moderator for this group?, Confused
  • Re: Moderator for this group?, RMOLLISE
• Do KTP crystals only work with lasers?, Rich
  • Re: Do KTP crystals only work with lasers?, Chris L Peterson
• Liberal Democrat=FREEDOM, Thomas
• Am I totally confused?, Pieter Litchfield
  • Re: Am I totally confused?, Alan French
    • Re: Am I totally confused?, LarryG
  • Re: Am I totally confused?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Am I totally confused?, Florian
    • Re: Am I totally confused?, Doink
  • Re: Am I totally confused?, Greg Crinklaw
    • Re: Am I totally confused?, Alan French
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Am I totally confused?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Am I totally confused?, eddie
  • Re: Am I totally confused?, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Am I totally confused?, Florian
    • Re: Am I totally confused?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Am I totally confused?, Dizzy_Stars
    • Re: Am I totally confused?, Shawn
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Fuzzy_Stars
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Shawn
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Fuzzy_Stars
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Shawn
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Fuzzy_Stars
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, eddie
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, oriel36
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, eddie
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, oriel36
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, eddie
      • Re: Am I totally confused?, Shawn
    • Re: Am I totally confused?, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Am I totally confused?, Shelldigger
    • Re: Am I totally confused?, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Am I totally confused?, eddie
• Thousand Oaks H-alpha, Thomas
  • Re: Thousand Oaks H-alpha, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Thousand Oaks H-alpha, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Thousand Oaks H-alpha, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Thousand Oaks H-alpha, Thomas
  • Re: Thousand Oaks H-alpha, Rich
    • Re: Thousand Oaks H-alpha, Thomas
      • Re: Thousand Oaks H-alpha, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Thousand Oaks H-alpha, Confused
  • Re: Thousand Oaks H-alpha, Martin R. Howell
    • Re: Thousand Oaks H-alpha, Thomas
• Re: Wal=Mart : No more S&T?, Brian Tung
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Wal=Mart : No more S&T?, dynamics
• News flash: Component failure on Hubble Space Telescope, Matthew Ota
  • Re: News flash: Component failure on Hubble Space Telescope, Shawn
  • Re: News flash: Component failure on Hubble Space Telescope, Ed Holden
• focuser insert for photography, starburst
  • Re: focuser insert for photography, lal_truckee
• Saturn Occultation Photo - Copyright Owner Wanted, teleskop
  • Re: Saturn Occultation Photo - Copyright Owner Wanted, blobrana
• Links for tracking Progress m-57 untill ISS docking ?, Catapult
• Aruhna hills day, halfrolich@comcast
  • Re: Arunah Hill Days, Alan French
  • Re: Aruhna hills day, Dizzy_Stars
• C5+ pages updated, Brian Tung
  • Re: C5+ pages updated, Florian
    • Re: C5+ pages updated, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: C5+ pages updated, David Nakamoto
      • Re: C5+ pages updated, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: C5+ pages updated, David Nakamoto
      • Re: C5+ pages updated, Brian Tung
      • Re: C5+ pages updated, David Nakamoto
      • Re: C5+ pages updated, Brian Tung
      • Re: C5+ pages updated, Rich
      • Re: C5+ pages updated, Thomas
      • Re: C5+ pages updated, Sam Wormley
    • Re: C5+ pages updated, nytecam
    • Re: C5+ pages updated, Rich
  • Re: C5+ pages updated, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: C5+ pages updated, RMOLLISE
  • Re: C5+ pages updated, David Nakamoto
    • Re: C5+ pages updated, whuptah
  • Re: C5+ pages updated, whuptah
• New website, lxbruce
• Wireless Remote Controlled Switchbox, ihate
  • Re: Wireless Remote Controlled Switchbox, starburst
  • Re: Wireless Remote Controlled Switchbox, William R. Mattil
    • Re: Wireless Remote Controlled Switchbox, ihate
• Object Movement Tracking?, njrusty
  • Re: Object Movement Tracking?, eddie
  • Re: Object Movement Tracking?, Gareth V. Williams
• Grand Canyon Star Party - North Rim, Morris Jones
  • Re: Grand Canyon Star Party - North Rim, kmmposting
    • Re: Grand Canyon Star Party - North Rim, Morris Jones
      • Re: Grand Canyon Star Party - North Rim, Matthew Ota
      • Re: Grand Canyon Star Party - North Rim, Morris Jones
  • Re: Grand Canyon Star Party - North Rim, canopus56
• Hubble's Main Camera Stops Working, Klaatu
  • Re: Hubble's Main Camera Stops Working, Rich
• Place to find binaries?, Art
  • Re: Place to find binaries?, Doink
    • Re: Place to find binaries?, Art
  • Re: Place to find binaries?, canopus56
    • Re: Place to find binaries?, Art
  • Re: Place to find binaries?, Carsten A. Arnholm
  • Re: Place to find binaries?, Rich
    • Re: Place to find binaries?, Art
  • Re: Place to find binaries?, Confused
• Shingletown SP coverage, Uncle Bob
  • Re: Shingletown SP coverage, Doink
    • Re: Shingletown SP coverage, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Shingletown SP coverage, Uncle Bob
      • Re: Shingletown SP coverage, Phil Wheeler
• EM-10 USD1 mount and PC control, mau
  • Re: EM-10 USD1 mount and PC control, PR Hobson
• Ann Coulter-Semen Sipper, Astronomie
  • Re: Ann Coulter-Semen Sipper: Astronomie, Hemorrhoid, Planetoid2001
• Idea for home built telescope., Todd A. Anderson
  • Re: Idea for home built telescope., canopus56
    • Re: Idea for home built telescope., Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Idea for home built telescope., Todd A. Anderson
      • Re: Idea for home built telescope., Brian Tung
      • Re: Idea for home built telescope., canopus56
      • Re: Idea for home built telescope., Ioannis
      • Re: Idea for home built telescope., Brian Tung
      • Re: Idea for home built telescope., canopus56
      • Re: Idea for home built telescope., jtaylor
      • Re: Idea for home built telescope., Brian Tung
  • Re: Idea for home built telescope., William Hamblen
  • Re: Idea for home built telescope., Doink
    • Re: Idea for home built telescope., William Hamblen
  • Re: Idea for home built telescope., Confused
• Mercury Systems Defunct, Doink
• PLUTO'S TWO SMALL MOONS OFFICIALLY NAMED NIX AND HYDRA (STScI-PR06-29), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
  • Re: PLUTO'S TWO SMALL MOONS OFFICIALLY NAMED NIX AND HYDRA (STScI-PR06-29), Bill Owen
• DARK ENERGY CO-DISCOVERER ADAM RIESS SHARES SHAW PRIZE IN ASTRONOMY FOR 2006 (STScI-PR06-27), INBOX ASTRONOMY : NEWS ALERT
• FYI Meade news, Edd Weninger
  • Re: FYI Meade news, Rich
    • Re: FYI Meade news, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: FYI Meade news, starburst
      • Re: FYI Meade news, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: FYI Meade news, starburst
      • Re: FYI Meade news, Pierre Vandevennne
      • Re: FYI Meade news, Rich
      • Re: FYI Meade news, RichIsaTroll
      • Re: FYI Meade news, Rich
      • Re: FYI Meade news, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: FYI Meade news, Matthew Ota
• Solar activity?, ldarryls
  • Re: Solar activity?, laura halliday
    • Re: Solar activity?, Astronomie
      • Re: Solar activity?, laura halliday
  • Re: Solar activity?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Solar activity?, Astronomie
      • Re: Solar activity?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Solar activity?, Johnny Borborigmi
      • Re: Solar activity?, Brian Tung
  • Re: Solar activity?, Dave Jessie
    • Re: Solar activity?, ldarryls
      • Re: Solar activity?, thad
      • Re: Solar activity?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Solar activity?, Chris L Peterson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Solar activity?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Solar activity?, William Hamblen
    • Re: Solar activity?, Chris L Peterson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Solar activity?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Solar activity?, Paul Winalski
    • Re: Solar activity?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Solar activity?, canopus56
  • Re: Solar activity?, Doink
  • Re: Solar activity?, Matthew Ota
  • Re: Solar activity?, Matthew Ota
  • Re: Solar activity?, Matthew Ota
  • Re: Solar activity?, Matthew Ota
• Aperture IS everything, Tom Rauschenbach
  • Re: Aperture IS everything, Doink
  • Re: Aperture IS everything, Brian Tung
  • Re: Aperture IS everything, tony_flanders
• Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Rich
  • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Mij Adyaw
    • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Rich
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Ed T
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Rich
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Ed T
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, RichIsaTroll
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Rich
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, RichIsaTroll
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, RichIsaTroll
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Rich
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Alan French
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Mij Adyaw
      • Message not available
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, Alan French
      • Re: Wow! Only $1350 per inch!, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Mexican UFO's, Astronomie
  • Re: Mexican UFO's, Bob May
    • Re: Mexican UFO's, Thomas A. Fine
      • Re: Mexican UFO's, Bob May
      • Re: Mexican UFO's, Thomas A. Fine
  • Re: Mexican UFO's, Bob May
    • Re: Mexican UFO's, Astronomie
      • Re: Mexican UFO's, Bob May
  • Re: Mexican UFO's, Arnold
    • Re: Mexican UFO's, Astronomie
  • Re: Mexican UFO's, Johnny Borborigmi
• Reducing Infrared Radiation ?, Loop
  • Re: Reducing Infrared Radiation ?, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Reducing Infrared Radiation ?, Havriliak
  • Re: Reducing Infrared Radiation ?, Roger Hamlett
• 1x Binoculars?, Thomas A. Fine
  • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Alan French
  • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Brian Tung
    • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Shawn
      • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Brian Tung
      • Re: 1x Binoculars?, William C. Keel
      • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Thomas A. Fine
      • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Don't Be Evil
    • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Martin Brown
  • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: 1x Binoculars?, William Hamblen
  • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Doink
    • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Shawn
  • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Tom Hise
    • Re: 1x Binoculars?, William Hamblen
      • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Tom Hise
      • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Odysseus
      • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Thomas Womack
    • Re: 1x Binoculars?, Brian Tung
• Contact info for the North American Sundial Society?, canopus56
  • Re: Contact info for the North American Sundial Society?, canopus56
• WOW, gatta arruffata
  • Re: WOW, Anonyma
    • Re: WOW, eddie
  • Re: WOW, LarryG
    • Re: WOW, eddie
      • Re: WOW, Larry G.
• Scopetronix Defunct?, Ol' Duffer
  • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, mollise1601
  • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, mmccants1234
    • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, Doink
    • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, Matthew Ota
      • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, Roger Hamlett
  • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, Mark S. Holden
    • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, Ol' Duffer
• climate facts, Astronomie
  • Re: climate facts, oriel36
  • Re: climate facts, Planetoid2001
    • Re: climate facts, rpasken
      • Re: climate facts, Pieter Litchfield
      • Re: climate facts, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: climate facts, Rich
      • Re: climate facts, Planetoid2001
      • Re: climate facts, Rolf Carstens
      • Re: climate facts, RichIsaTroll
      • Re: climate facts, Astronomie
      • Re: climate facts, Planetoid2001
  • Re: climate facts, Shawn
  • Re: climate facts, Rich
  • Re: climate facts, David Knisely
  • Re: climate facts, richard schumacher
• Re: Are you intelligent?, RMOLLISE
  • Re: Are you intelligent?, Michael Asherman
  • Re: Are you intelligent?, whuptah
• Re: OT Re: *VOTE* Yes on Marriage Protection Amendment!, AM
  • Re: OT Re: *VOTE* Yes on Marriage Protection Amendment!, Mij Adyaw
• AstroPhoto Insight newsletter June 2006 issue, Al Degutis
• Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, AM
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, AM
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Astronomie
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, AM
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, eddie
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Eugene Griessel
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Eugene Griessel
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Paul Winalski
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, canopus56
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Doink
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, tedkord
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Shawn
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, John Savard
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Planetoid2001
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, johnschiap
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Eugene Griessel
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, tedkord
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, AM
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Carsten A. Arnholm
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, tedkord
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, AM
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, AM
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Carsten A. Arnholm
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Greg Crinklaw
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Llanzlan Klazmon
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, M104galaxy@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Mark
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Joe S.
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Shawn
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, eddie
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, eddie
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Doink
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Pat O'Connell
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Doink
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Ioannis
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, eddie
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, eddie
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, eddie
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Dizzy_Stars
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Don't Be Evil
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Planetoid2001
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Brad Guth
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Paul Winalski
    • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, eddie
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Dizzy_Stars
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, eddie
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Dizzy_Stars
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, eddie
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Dizzy_Stars
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, eddie
      • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Constitution, America, and Rule of Law Loving, Liberal Patriot?, Questions
  • Re: Is Everyone Here a Liberal Heathen?, richard schumacher
• Re: Mewlon 210 against usual SCTs, Shankar Bhattacharyya
• Re: 95 years left, Astronomie
  • Re: 95 years left, Martin R. Howell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 95 years left, Rich
    • Re: 95 years left, Doink
    • Re: 95 years left, Stuart Chapman
      • Re: 95 years left, Planetoid2001
      • Re: 95 years left, Brian Tung
  • Re: 95 years left, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: 95 years left, John Savard
• newbie needing eyepiece advise, k
  • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, Anonymous AtWork
    • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, k
      • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, Brian Tung
      • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, John Nichols
      • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, Tom Rauschenbach
      • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, goodnigh
  • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, Joe S.
    • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, k
      • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, Brian Tung
      • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, Florian
      • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, k
    • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, goodnigh
      • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, goodnigh
  • Re: newbie needing eyepiece advise, David Nakamoto
• Re: question about inclination of earth's axis., obhiee
• Milky Way Rising ‹ Understanding Our Place in the Galaxy, Bill Tschumy
  • Re: Milky Way Rising < Understanding Our Place in the Galaxy, JL Hopkins
• VIDEO: The trailhead at Mt. Pilchuck, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: VIDEO: The trailhead at Mt. Pilchuck, Martin R. Howell
    • Re: VIDEO: The trailhead at Mt. Pilchuck, Ioannis
      • Re: VIDEO: The trailhead at Mt. Pilchuck, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: VIDEO: The trailhead at Mt. Pilchuck, Ioannis
• Re: "Science" Lightweight Addresses "Global Warming" (and Chinese Food), Phineas T Puddleduck
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Science" Lightweight Addresses "Global Warming" (and Chinese Food), Astronomie
  • Re: "Science" Lightweight Addresses "Global Warming" (and Chinese Food), Planetoid2001
• Pluto's Twins Get Their Names (Nix and Hydra), Sam Wormley
• 2004XP14: Potential threat?, Jack F. Twist
  • Re: 2004XP14: Potential threat?, Brian Tung
    • Re: 2004XP14: Potential threat?, George
    • Re: 2004XP14: Potential threat?, Davoud
  • Re: 2004XP14: Potential threat?, George
• Article on Tides, Matthew Ota
  • Re: Article on Tides, canopus56
    • Re: Article on Tides, Matthew Ota
    • Re: Article on Tides, jtaylor
      • Re: Article on Tides, Tom Polakis
    • Re: Article on Tides, AM
  • Re: Article on Tides, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Article on Tides, Matthew Ota
      • Re: Article on Tides, Chuck Taylor
      • Re: Article on Tides, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Article on Tides, Dr John Stockton
    • Re: Article on Tides, Matthew Ota
      • Re: Article on Tides, Edward Erbeck
      • Re: Article on Tides, Matthew Ota
• Burgess Optical Dielectric Diagonals $99, JJ
• Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Joe S.
  • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Beta Persei
    • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Beta Persei
  • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, boo
  • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Tim Killian
    • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Florian
      • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Astronomie
  • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, William Hamblen
    • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Jan Owen
      • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, William Hamblen
      • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Eugene Griessel
    • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Hiking in the nude to celebrate the summer solstice, Eugene Griessel
• Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Astronomie
  • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Matthew Ota
    • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Martin Brown
    • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, allisonki
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Robin Wier
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Shawn
      • Re:Is Min really Ann Coulter? No just another repulsive Conservative shill, Questions
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter? No just another repulsive Conservative shill, Shawn
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter? No just another repulsive Conservative shill, Questions
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Joe S.
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Matthew Ota
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Martin Brown
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Astronomie
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Astronomie
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Matthew Ota
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Brian Tung
    • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Shawn
  • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Matthew Ota
    • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Rick Evans
      • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, AM
  • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Ed Holden
  • Re: Is Min really Ann Coulter?, Planetoid2001
• It's called a 'solstice'...., Jim
  • Re: It's called a 'solstice'...., oriel36
    • Re: It's called a 'solstice'...., Paul Winalski
      • Re: It's called a 'solstice'...., oriel36
      • Re: It's called a 'solstice'...., Chris L Peterson
      • Re: It's called a 'solstice'...., oriel36
• Re: Keep it on the forum, John Savard
• Al Gore re-surfaces, Astronomie
  • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces, eddie
    • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Anonymous AtWork
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Anonymous AtWork
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Matthew Ota
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Anonymous AtWork
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, John Savard
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, John Savard
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, eddie
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, David G. Nagel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Anonymous AtWork
      • Message not available
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Astronomie
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, William Hamblen
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Pieter Litchfield
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, William Hamblen
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Astronomie
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Pieter Litchfield
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, starburst
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Pieter Litchfield
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, eddie
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Shawn
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Astronomie
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, AM
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Anonymous AtWork
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, Fuzzy_Stars
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, eddie
      • Message not available
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, eddie
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces; THE GODS ARE LAUGHING, T . Bloompaster Weatherford
    • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces, Matthew Ota
  • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces, Planetoid2001
    • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces, Astronomie
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces, eddie
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces, T . Bloompaster Weatherford
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces, eddie
    • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces, Ed T
      • Re: Al Gore re-surfaces, AM
• Meade 114 AT EQ, Art
  • Re: Meade 114 AT EQ, Pat O'Connell
    • Re: Meade 114 AT EQ, Art
      • Re: Meade 114 AT EQ, Pat O'Connell
• Chant Medal Award, Ed Majden
• jokes please, Mick
  • Re: jokes please, J McBride
    • Re: jokes please, AM
      • Re: jokes please, Mick
• TV-76 questions, Wayfaring Stranger
  • Re: TV-76 questions, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: TV-76 questions, RMOLLISE
  • Re: TV-76 questions, Shawn
  • Re: TV-76 questions, Ed T
    • Re: TV-76 questions, Florian
    • Re: TV-76 questions, Florian
  • Re: TV-76 questions, Florian
  • Re: TV-76 questions, William Hamblen
    • Re: TV-76 questions, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: TV-76 questions, Florian
      • Re: TV-76 questions, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: TV-76 questions, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: TV-76 questions, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: TV-76 questions, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: TV-76 questions, Brian Tung
      • Re: TV-76 questions, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: TV-76 questions, Brian Tung
      • Re: TV-76 questions, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: TV-76 questions, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: TV-76 questions, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: TV-76 questions, David Nakamoto
      • Re: TV-76 questions, Howard Lester
• Help with astronomy planning SW, Sam The Cat
  • Re: Help with astronomy planning SW, laura halliday
    • Re: Help with astronomy planning SW, Edward Erbeck
  • Re: Help with astronomy planning SW, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Help with astronomy planning SW, laura halliday
      • Re: Help with astronomy planning SW, Brian Tung
      • Re: Help with astronomy planning SW, laura halliday
  • Re: Help with astronomy planning SW, ihate
    • Re: Help with astronomy planning SW, Brian Tung
• what stand alone DVD player/ recorder will play my planetary AVIs?, Eric Peach
  • Re: what stand alone DVD player/ recorder will play my planetary AVIs?, Stuart Levy
  • Re: what stand alone DVD player/ recorder will play my planetary AVIs?, tedkord
• Galileo 10x50 widefield binocs. review, tedkord
• 7x50 binoc's $15 ??, dynamics
  • Message not available
    • Re: 7x50 binoc's $15 ??, dynamics
  • Message not available
    • Re: 7x50 binoc's $15 ??, Tom Rauschenbach
  • Re: 7x50 binoc's $15 ??, nytecam
    • Re: 7x50 binoc's $15 ??, lal_truckee
      • Re: 7x50 binoc's $15 ??, dynamics
      • Message not available
      • Re: 7x50 binoc's $15 ??, DB Rea
• Where to purchase Fujinon's in Tokyo, Greedy Shark
• Dark Matter, Dave
  • Re: Dark Matter, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Dark Matter, Stupendous_Man
      • Re: Dark Matter, Phineas T Puddleduck
      • Re: Dark Matter, Larry Caldwell
    • Re: Dark Matter, adm
  • Re: Dark Matter, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: Dark Matter, whuptah
• Re: NASA Opts to Ignore Chief Engineer & Safety Offices - Or Did They? AP Article, AM
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: NASA Opts to Ignore Chief Engineer & Safety Offices - Or Did They? AP Article, Rich
• Astronomy please!, Ken Bradley
  • Re: Astronomy please!, William Hamblen
    • Re: Astronomy please!, Joe S.
      • Message not available
      • Re: Astronomy please!, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Astronomy please!, Shawn
      • Re: Astronomy please!, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Astronomy please!, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Astronomy please!, eddie
  • Re: Astronomy please!, Davoud
    • Re: Astronomy please!, Strait
    • Re: Astronomy please!, nytecam
      • Re: Astronomy please!, T.T.
  • Re: Astronomy please!, Mij Adyaw
    • Re: Astronomy please!, Planetoid101
  • Re: Astronomy please!, G
  • Re: Astronomy please!, Mick
  • Re: Astronomy please!, Guy Macon
    • Re: Astronomy please!, Jim Attfield
  • Re: Astronomy please!, oriel36
  • Re: Astronomy please!, Planetoid101
    • Re: Astronomy please!, Jim Attfield
  • Re: Astronomy please!, Jim Attfield
  • Re: Astronomy please!, Planetoid2001
    • Re: Astronomy please!, Bob Schmall
  • Re: Astronomy please!, veritas
    • Re: Astronomy please - Where is Nancy when you need her?, Mij Adyaw
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Astronomy please - Where is XXXXX when you need her?, John Savard
  • Re: Astronomy please!, eddie
    • Re: Astronomy please!, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Astronomy please!, Planetoid2001
      • Re: Astronomy please!, veritas
  • Re: Astronomy please!, Scott Smith
• Re: Millennium (Atlas) Unbounded?, gubbenimanen
• Great Astro Accessory, Doink
  • Re: Great Astro Accessory, George
  • Re: Great Astro Accessory, Joe S.
    • Re: Great Astro Accessory, Doink
      • Re: Great Astro Accessory, George
      • Re: Great Astro Accessory, Doink
      • Re: Great Astro Accessory, George
  • Message not available
    • Re: Great Astro Accessory, Gil
  • Message not available
    • Re: Great Astro Accessory, Rick Evans
      • Message not available
      • Re: Great Astro Accessory, Rick Evans
• Re: I VOTE NO TO MARRIAGE!!!, Florian
  • Re: I VOTE NO TO MARRIAGE!!!, katrinaxx
• Summer Issue of Skywatch Ready for Download!, RMOLLISE
  • Re: Summer Issue of Skywatch Ready for Download!, Doink
    • Re: Summer Issue of Skywatch Ready for Download!, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Summer Issue of Skywatch Ready for Download!, Paul Clark
      • Re: Summer Issue of Skywatch Ready for Download!, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Summer Issue of Skywatch Ready for Download!, Paul Clark
      • Re: Summer Issue of Skywatch Ready for Download!, RMOLLISE
  • Re: Summer Issue of Skywatch Ready for Download!, Matthew Ota
  • Re: Summer Issue of Skywatch Ready for Download!, Pat O'Connell
    • Re: Summer Issue of Skywatch Ready for Download!, RMOLLISE
• Hawking -- "Solution is Near"??, W. Watson
  • Re: Hawking --