Re: OFF TOPIC: Laser Printer
- From: "Ed Holden" <ed.holden@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 20:36:32 GMT
"Tim Auton" <tim.auton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Slow, fuzzy, low resolution printing plus hearing impairment in one
convenient package!
Yes, but the money I have saved in not using an inkjet or laser printer
more than makes up for it. ;--)
Remember to run Windows 3.1 so you can be sure to find drivers.
I run a Star LC-20 under Windows 2000. That dot-matrix printer is
14 years old and still prints great. The ribbon currently installed cost
£2 and has lasted 6 years. For misers like myself, dot-matrix just
can't be beaten.
.
- References:
- Re: OFF TOPIC: Laser Printer
- From: Rich
- Re: OFF TOPIC: Laser Printer
- From: Len Philpot
- Re: OFF TOPIC: Laser Printer
- From: Rich
- Re: OFF TOPIC: Laser Printer
- From: Joe S.
- Re: OFF TOPIC: Laser Printer
- From: Tim Auton
- Re: OFF TOPIC: Laser Printer
- Prev by Date: Re: www.freenameastar.com
- Next by Date: Re: What are the three best popular-science books?
- Previous by thread: Re: OFF TOPIC: Laser Printer
- Next by thread: Re: OFF TOPIC: Laser Printer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|