Re: quark black holes
- From: Llanzlan Klazmon <Klazmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Jun 2006 14:22:58 +1200
"Mikhael" <mikha@xxxxxxx> wrote in gxohg.15805$771.15200@edtnps89:">news:gxohg.15805$771.15200@edtnps89:
">> "It's exciting because we're learning about the tiniest things in
the
universe," said Ouyed. The next step, he said, is finding concrete
evidence. "
SEE..it says BLACK HOLES
Then the article is wrong.
Klazmon.
The greatest enemy of science is closed minds like yours!!
It has nothing to do with a closed mind. It a question of definition.
Klazmon.
.
- References:
- quark black holes
- From: Mikhael
- Re: quark black holes
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: quark black holes
- From: Mikhael
- Re: quark black holes
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: quark black holes
- From: Mikhael
- Re: quark black holes
- From: Phineas T Puddleduck
- Re: quark black holes
- From: Mikhael
- Re: quark black holes
- From: Llanzlan Klazmon
- Re: quark black holes
- From: Mikhael
- quark black holes
- Prev by Date: Re: quark black holes
- Next by Date: Re: Kim Kommando siez, "Canon and Nikon Pull Out of the DSLR Market"
- Previous by thread: Re: quark black holes
- Next by thread: Re: quark black holes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|