Re: Why the planes did not crumple
- From: brian@xxxxxxx (Brian Tung)
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
LarryG wrote:
Very good response. (I expect no less from you!;-)
However, I somewhat disagree with your main point, that time is
a factor.
In the case of the card going through the carrot, if the card
had enough momentum behind it, and struck the carrot at the
same angle, then the result would be the same, no matter what
the speed or time (all other conditions remaining the same.)
As for the carrot going through the card, you can get similar
results, if the momentum is sufficient to push the carrot
through the plane-face of the card. If the carrot strikes
the edge of the card, then it will get cut.
Huh?! Momentum is speed times mass. Speed is distance over time. It
cannot at once be about momentum and *not* be about speed or time.
Again, orientation, and strength along the axis of motion
matter greatly, and not so much time.
I don't see how you can attribute the result (in part) to momentum, and
at the same time say that time is not a factor. Maybe I misunderstand
what you mean by "time."
--
Brian Tung <brian@xxxxxxx>
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why the planes did not crumple
- From: LarryG
- Re: Why the planes did not crumple
- References:
- Re: Why the planes did not crumple
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: Why the planes did not crumple
- From: LarryG
- Re: Why the planes did not crumple
- Prev by Date: Re: Why the planes did not crumple
- Next by Date: Re: two red spots on jupiter almost colliding
- Previous by thread: Re: Why the planes did not crumple
- Next by thread: Re: Why the planes did not crumple
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|