S&T C-6 Review
- From: "Doink" <skyman102a@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:08:41 -0700
OK, I've brought this up before and it started a flame war. Let's try to
stay cool....
I read the reviews of telescopes in S&T and am always disappointed that they
don't do more rigorous testing or provide some real. The review of the C-6
is no exception. There's a bunch of "writing" about the mount and the
"optically excellent 6x30 finder" and then the write states the OTA has
"excellent optics". He determines this because he can see the Cassini
Division in Saturn. Neat. Those observations are subject to numerous
factors; seeing comes to mind. Why don't they bench test the optics? I'd
like the stats, not the impressions of an employee of the company paid to
sell the stuff.
Doink
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: S&T C-6 Review
- From: Shelldigger
- Re: S&T C-6 Review
- From: Phil Wheeler
- Re: S&T C-6 Review
- From: Alan French
- Re: S&T C-6 Review
- Prev by Date: Jovian moon observation
- Next by Date: Re: Jovian moon observation
- Previous by thread: Jovian moon observation
- Next by thread: Re: S&T C-6 Review
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|