Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles



It all depends on how good your eyes are.
Ras Al ~3.6" at 31X produces an apparent separation
to your eye of 111 " or 1.85' The normal "young eye"
IIRC can separate about 2'.
It seems you have good eyes.
I would need about 60X to see the split.

d.

Ioannis wrote:

I have often seen people here write about "how much magnification a tight
double requires to split, with this or that scope".

One curious phenomenon which I have observed with my surgically modified
Tasco, is that if the Tasco IS able to split the double I am looking at, I
perceive it as split on ANY magnification the Tasco zoom EP provides.

For example, Ras Algheti (~3.6") is at the practical separation limit of my
60mm/700mm Tasco. On VERY clear nights, I see it split even at
magnifications of 31x. Increasing the magnification with the zoom, only
increases the separation between the components, but the components ARE
visible as distinct, even at the lowest magnification. They are really close
to each other, but my eye clearly sees two separate stars there.

Since resolving power is dependent only on aperture theoretically, shouldn't
this be true for any scope? If for example your scope resolves epsilon
Lyrae, shouldn't it resolve it even at its lowest magnification?

I know the opposite is true: If your scope's HIGHEST magnification cannot
resolve a certain double, certainly no lower magnification will be able to
do it.

So I wonder, what exactly is the meaning of "my scope requires magnification
x to split double y". Maybe related to a more "subjective" perception where
the viewer requires the split to be "clean" and "comfortable"?
--
Ioannis

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles
    ... shouldn't it resolve it even at its lowest magnification? ... That is an issue that rests with your eyes (and possibly with the ... Your eye isn't able to resolve things better than an arcminute or two, ... to binocular resolution, a while back ago, which I remembered only as soon ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles
    ... his apparent separation limit was about 135" which is similar ... If the secondary is brighter than mag 9, apply magnification ... Schaeffer's improved telescopic limiting magnitude algorithm were built ... Traditionally this is done at 550nm, but if the star is predominately ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: making my own telescope type magnifiers?
    ... the Opti-Visor and their ilk all bug my eyes. ... Remove one object glass (the big ... Mount this lens just in front but not touching the other ... The magnification will depend on the eyepiece fitted - usually ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: making my own telescope type magnifiers?
    ... the Opti-Visor and their ilk all bug my eyes. ... buying surplus coated lenses I can make my own. ... more than any other loupe at any given magnification or focal length. ... Certainly much better than Opti-visor. ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: 3D test on Channel 4
    ... laterally much like a static convergence error and coloured spectacle ... This is a very unnatural way to view, because your eyes have to learn to ... separation being a function of distance within the image. ... coloured specs have no optical power, there is no danger of mis-convergence ...
    (uk.tech.digital-tv)