Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles
- From: brian@xxxxxxx (Brian Tung)
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 08:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
Ioannis wrote:
After seeing Kurt's post, I searched a bit for the actual separation for Ras
Al. Some sources state 4.6", which according to your calculation would give
2.37', so this certainly falls into the "normal eye" domain.
All my sources (Dickinson, Tirion and Dunlop, Burnham) say 4.6
arcseconds, and moreover, Burnham says it hasn't changed in about a
couple of hundred years.
--
Brian Tung <brian@xxxxxxx>
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles
- From: canopus56
- Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles
- References:
- Magnification needed to split tight doubles
- From: Ioannis
- Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles
- From: Dan McKenna
- Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles
- From: Ioannis
- Magnification needed to split tight doubles
- Prev by Date: Re: The Ordeal
- Next by Date: Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this....
- Previous by thread: Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles
- Next by thread: Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles
- Index(es):