sci.astro.amateur

• Date Index

---

• Stopping down an 80mm to 70mm, Mike Thomas
• First surface mirror: Distributers?, WilliamR
  • Re: First surface mirror: Distributers?, Scott Smith
• Just got a G-11 and have some questions, Craig M . Bobchin
  • Re: Just got a G-11 and have some questions, AM
  • Re: Just got a G-11 and have some questions, lal_truckee
    • Re: Just got a G-11 and have some questions, lal_truckee
      • Re: Just got a G-11 and have some questions, Craig M . Bobchin
    • Re: Just got a G-11 and have some questions, Craig M . Bobchin
      • Re: Just got a G-11 and have some questions, lal_truckee
• fast 2-D convolution in polar coordinates?, Brian Tung
  • Re: fast 2-D convolution in polar coordinates?, Martin Brown
  • Re: fast 2-D convolution in polar coordinates?, Don't Be Evil
  • Re: fast 2-D convolution in polar coordinates?, Mike Thomas
• Re: Website announce: Indices to Nearside LPODs - 2004 to 6-1-2006, canopus56
• Get $750 Free - No Deposit Required!, amcbryde
• "Hopefully do a Hubble Repair" --- Michael Griffin, Sam Wormley
• Double star splitting, Mike Thomas
  • Re: Double star splitting, jc
  • Re: Double star splitting, Dennis Woos
  • Re: Double star splitting, canopus56
    • Re: Double star splitting, EdZ
    • Re: Double star splitting, EdZ
    • Re: Double star splitting, canopus56
      • Re: Double star splitting, Mike Thomas
• Finder index charts to Barnard's Photographic Atlas of Dark Clouds, canopus56
• Strange LX200 tracking and PEC problems, samosmrke@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Strange LX200 tracking and PEC problems, William Hamblen
    • Re: Strange LX200 tracking and PEC problems, samosmrke@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Strange LX200 tracking and PEC problems, Havriliak
      • Re: Strange LX200 tracking and PEC problems, Havriliak
      • Re: Strange LX200 tracking and PEC problems, samosmrke@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Strange LX200 tracking and PEC problems, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Strange LX200 tracking and PEC problems, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Strange LX200 tracking and PEC problems, samosmrke@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Strange LX200 tracking and PEC problems, Roger Hamlett
• QuickTime Virtual Reality panoramas of the moon, Florian
  • Re: QuickTime Virtual Reality panoramas of the moon, SkySea
• Astronomy News Source???, Sunwolf
  • Re: Astronomy News Source???, Rick Evans
  • Re: Astronomy News Source???, VicXnews
  • Re: Astronomy News Source???, Paul S. Walsh
  • Re: Astronomy News Source???, Starman
  • Re: Astronomy News Source???, ed1ward2
  • Re: Astronomy News Source???, ed1ward2
  • Re: Astronomy News Source???, SkySea
  • Re: Astronomy News Source???, Klaatu
    • Re: Astronomy News Source???, Klaatu
    • RSS Feeds Re: Astronomy News Source???, Sunwolf
• Smoky Skies, Willie R . Meghar
  • Re: Smoky Skies, elaich
    • Re: Smoky Skies, Joe S.
    • Re: Smoky Skies, Florian
  • Re: Smoky Skies, Howard Lester
  • Re: Smoky Skies, David G. Nagel
    • Re: Smoky Skies, Willie R . Meghar
      • Re: Smoky Skies, David G. Nagel
• Re: Q: Telescope, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Q: Telescope, Martin R. Howell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Q: Telescope, Willie R . Meghar
• Observing spreadsheet planner - website announce, canopus56
  • Re: Observing spreadsheet planner - website announce, canopus56
• Building an observatory, Barking BOB
  • Re: Building an observatory, Bob Schmall
  • Re: Building an observatory, hgrytten
  • Re: Building an observatory, Davoud
    • Re: Building an observatory, Joe S.
      • Re: Building an observatory, Davoud
  • Re: Building an observatory, lal_truckee
  • Re: Building an observatory, nytecam
• EQ6 mount SynScan hand controller has frozen, Barking BOB
  • Re: EQ6 mount SynScan hand controller has frozen, Skylook123
    • Re: EQ6 mount SynScan hand controller has frozen, Barking BOB
  • Re: EQ6 mount SynScan hand controller has frozen, RMOLLISE
• Give me a review of this scope..., G
  • Re: Give me a review of this scope..., Don't Be Evil
    • Re: Give me a review of this scope..., G
• Re: How to decouple scope, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: Why "Project Orion" is more vital now than ever, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: Why "Project Orion" is more vital now than ever, Rich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why "Project Orion" is more vital now than ever, AM
    • Message not available
      • Re: Why "Project Orion" is more vital now than ever, AM
• ISS sightings, Mike Thomas
  • Message not available
    • Re: ISS sightings, Stephen Paul
  • Re: ISS sightings, canopus56
    • Re: ISS sightings, Mike Thomas
      • Re: ISS sightings, Florian
      • Re: ISS sightings, Mike Thomas
      • Re: ISS sightings, Florian
      • Re: ISS sightings, Mike Thomas
      • Re: ISS sightings, Florian
      • Re: ISS sightings, Mike Thomas
      • Re: ISS sightings, Skylook123
      • Re: ISS sightings, Mike Thomas
• last nights star test, Mike Thomas
  • Re: last nights star test, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: last nights star test, jc
• Re: Galactica, Stephen Paul
• Scopetronix Update, Ol' Duffer
  • Re: Scopetronix Update, RMOLLISE
  • Re: Scopetronix Update, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: Scopetronix Update, Rich
      • Re: Scopetronix Update, Davoud
      • Re: Scopetronix Update, T . Bloompaster Weatherford
      • Re: Scopetronix Update, Davoud
  • Re: Scopetronix Update, Joe S.
    • Re: Scopetronix Update, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Scopetronix Update, Len Philpot
      • Re: Scopetronix Update, RMOLLISE
• Planning a better future for backyard observing., Stephen Paul
  • Re: Planning a better future for backyard observing., Brian Tung
  • Re: Planning a better future for backyard observing., Greg Crinklaw
    • Re: Planning a better future for backyard observing., Stephen Paul
      • Re: Planning a better future for backyard observing., Greg Crinklaw
  • Re: Planning a better future for backyard observing., RMOLLISE
    • Re: Planning a better future for backyard observing., Greg Crinklaw
  • Re: Planning a better future for backyard observing., Jason Woowaterstonist
    • Re: Planning a better future for backyard observing., Stephen Paul
• MN66-Ovals at low power, Dan
  • Re: MN66-Ovals at low power, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: MN66-Ovals at low power, Brian Tung
    • Re: MN66-Ovals at low power, Dan
  • Re: MN66-Ovals at low power, Stephen Paul
• Spectrum of Spider Webs, Matthew Ota
  • Re: Spectrum of Spider Webs, WA2GUF
  • Re: Spectrum of Spider Webs, Brian Tung
  • Re: Spectrum of Spider Webs, Ioannis
    • Re: Spectrum of Spider Webs, Brian Tung
      • Re: Spectrum of Spider Webs, Ioannis
      • Re: Spectrum of Spider Webs, WA2GUF
      • Re: Spectrum of Spider Webs, WA2GUF
      • Re: Spectrum of Spider Webs, Nagas Larc
• Dew Prevention, BClay
  • Re: Dew Prevention, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Dew Prevention, Dave
      • Re: Dew Prevention, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Dew Prevention, Paul Winalski
• Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, Tim Killian
  • Re: Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, Eugene Griessel
    • Re: Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, William Hamblen
      • Re: Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, laura halliday
      • Re: Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, Eugene Griessel
      • Re: Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, AM
      • Re: Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, SZumbo
  • Re: Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, elaich
    • Re: Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, SZumbo
      • ASTRO: OT: Re: Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, SZumbo
      • Re: ASTRO: OT: Re: Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, ed1ward2
  • Re: Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, Rick Evans
  • Re: Original Tapes of the Apollo XI Moon Walk Missing, Shawn
• Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, Rich
  • Re: Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, Mij Adyaw
    • Re: Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, Rich
      • Re: Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, Davoud
      • Re: Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, Rich
      • Re: Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, William R. Mattil
      • Re: Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, Rich
      • Re: Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, Bert Hyman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, AM
      • Message not available
      • Re: Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, Steve Sherman
      • Re: Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, Davoud
    • Re: Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, Havriliak
  • Re: Never knew Questar modified OM-1s, laura halliday
• Would you mortgage the House for two weeks on the Space Station?, TBerk
  • Re: Would you mortgage the House for two weeks on the Space Station?, John Nichols
  • Re: Would you mortgage the House for two weeks on the Space Station?, George
  • Re: Would you mortgage the House for two weeks on the Space Station?, Shawn
  • Re: Would you mortgage the House for two weeks on the Space Station?, jc
• Good enough, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Good enough, laura halliday
  • Re: Good enough, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Good enough, Brian Tung
  • Re: Good enough, Mean Mr Mustard
  • Re: Good enough, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Good enough, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Good enough, Tom Rauschenbach
      • Message not available
      • Re: Good enough, Richard F.L.R.Snashall
  • Re: Good enough, Willie R . Meghar
    • Re: Good enough, Alan French
  • Re: Good enough, jc
  • Re: Good enough, Chris L Peterson
• 8/22/2006 planetary astrophoto opp - Venus, Sat, Merc, Moon, canopus56
• modern eyepiece focusers, allisonki
  • Re: modern eyepiece focusers, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: modern eyepiece focusers, Mad
• The Copernican delay, oriel36
• ALCON EXPO - The Astronomical League Convention - August 4-5, 2006, eflaspo
• More on diffraction rings, Mike Thomas
  • Re: More on diffraction rings, Dan
    • Re: More on diffraction rings, Mike Thomas
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Dan
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, William Hamblen
  • Re: More on diffraction rings, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: More on diffraction rings, Mike Thomas
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Mike Thomas
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: More on diffraction rings, Howard Lester
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Brian Tung
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Brian Tung
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Howard Lester
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Brian Tung
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Mike Thomas
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Howard Lester
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Sam Wormley
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Mike Thomas
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Sam Wormley
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Mike Thomas
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Sam Wormley
    • Re: More on diffraction rings, Llanzlan Klazmon
  • Re: More on diffraction rings, Willie R . Meghar
    • Re: More on diffraction rings, Mike Thomas
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Willie R . Meghar
    • Re: More on diffraction rings, Mike Thomas
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Alan French
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Brian Tung
      • Re: More on diffraction rings, Mike Thomas
• http://rapidshare.de/files/25705110/Bathing_MMS.rar, sSharma
• Re: Desert Fire, Edward Erbeck
  • Re: Desert Fire, Florian
    • Re: Desert Fire, Edward Erbeck
      • Re: Desert Fire, Shawn
    • Re: Desert Fire, Florian
    • Re: Desert Fire, Florian
      • Re: Desert Fire, Edward Erbeck
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Desert Fire, AM
  • Re: Desert Fire, Florian
• Where to Get Eyepiece Storage Bottles?, Ol' Duffer
  • Re: Where to Get Eyepiece Storage Bottles?, Joe S.
    • Re: Where to Get Eyepiece Storage Bottles?, Ol' Duffer
  • Re: Where to Get Eyepiece Storage Bottles?, jimandlaura26
    • Re: Where to Get Eyepiece Storage Bottles?, Ioannis
    • Re: Where to Get Eyepiece Storage Bottles?, Ol' Duffer
      • Re: Where to Get Eyepiece Storage Bottles?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Where to Get Eyepiece Storage Bottles?, Jan Owen
      • Re: Where to Get Eyepiece Storage Bottles?, Bob G .
    • Re: Where to Get Eyepiece Storage Bottles?, Bob G .
• Re: Somewhat OT: Shuttle SRB Cam, Mike Thomas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Somewhat OT: Shuttle SRB Cam, Tom Polakis
    • Re: Somewhat OT: Shuttle SRB Cam, Greg Crinklaw
  • Re: Somewhat OT: Shuttle SRB Cam, George
  • Re: Somewhat OT: Shuttle SRB Cam, Paul Buglass
• Gareth Slee audio message, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Gareth Slee audio message, Gareth Slee
• For continuation, oriel36
• diffraction rings and focusing, Mike Thomas
  • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, Roger Hamlett
    • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, starburst
      • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, dan chaffee
    • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, Mike Thomas
      • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, Howard Lester
      • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, Brian Tung
      • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, Bob May
      • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, Mike Thomas
      • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, dan chaffee
      • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, Mike Thomas
  • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, MitchAlsup
  • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, Chuck Taylor
    • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, Mike Thomas
      • Re: diffraction rings and focusing, Martin R. Howell
• MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, Dan
  • Re: MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, Chuck Taylor
    • Re: MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, Dan
  • Re: MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, starburst
      • Re: MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, Dan
      • Re: MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, Brian Tung
      • Re: MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, Dan
      • Re: MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, Brian Tung
      • Re: MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, Dan
      • Re: MN66 Collimation - BINGO!, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Need help of really smart astronomer, jmac39
  • Re: Need help of really smart astronomer, Bob Schmall
  • Re: Need help of really smart astronomer, Bob May
• Starlord audio message should work for all now, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Starlord audio message should work for all now, Martin R. Howell
• Need Help - Question re: Binocular Telescope, Photo Guy
  • Re: Need Help - Question re: Binocular Telescope, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Need Help - Question re: Binocular Telescope, Alan French
  • Re: Need Help - Question re: Binocular Telescope, Llanzlan Klazmon
• best questions at star parties?, Brian Tung
  • Re: best questions at star parties?, Davoud
  • Re: best questions at star parties?, Photo Guy
  • Re: best questions at star parties?, Mean Mr Mustard
    • Re: best questions at star parties?, Morris Jones
    • Re: best questions at star parties?, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: best questions at star parties?, Chuck Taylor
    • Re: best questions at star parties?, SunSeeker
  • Re: best questions at star parties?, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: best questions at star parties?, Jeff
  • Re: best questions at star parties?, Stu
    • Re: best questions at star parties?, Edward Erbeck
    • Re: best questions at star parties?, Mike Thomas
  • Re: best questions at star parties?, Stu
  • Re: best questions at star parties?, Matthew Ota
    • Message not available
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, Davoud
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, oriel36
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, ed1ward2
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, ed1ward2
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, oriel36
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, T.T.
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, oriel36
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, oriel36
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, Shawn
    • Message not available
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, wsnell01
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, oriel36
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, wsnell01
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, John Nichols
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, T.T.
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, oriel36
  • Re: best questions at star parties?, Paul Schlyter
  • Re: best questions at star parties?, Glenn Holliday
    • Re: best questions at star parties?, Odysseus
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: best questions at star parties?, Gil
• Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Brian Tung
  • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Davoud
    • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Brian Tung
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Davoud
  • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Bill Owen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", William C. Keel
    • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Bill Owen
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Chris L Peterson
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Davoud
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Chris L Peterson
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Terry B
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Brian Tung
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Ioannis
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Chris L Peterson
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Bill Owen
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Pieter Litchfield
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Paul Schlyter
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", David G. Nagel
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Chris L Peterson
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Brian Tung
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Pieter Litchfield
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", oriel36
      • Re: What is "retrograde orbital motion?", Paul Schlyter
• Breaking Pentagon admission: They want terrorists to win, Anonymous AtWork
• Re: Liberal Atheists damned to Hellfire, AM
  • Re: Liberal Atheists damned to Hellfire, Mij Adyaw
• Preview Screenings of "The Journey to Palomar" in Southern California, Mike Simmons
• Partyin, Genius Jew for all time, SunSeeker
• Starlord speaks!!!, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Starlord speaks!!!, Davoud
    • Re: Starlord speaks!!!, VicXnews
      • Re: Starlord speaks!!!, Davoud
      • Re: Starlord speaks!!!, AM
      • Re: Starlord speaks!!!, jc
      • Re: Starlord speaks!!!, Gareth Slee
      • Re: Starlord speaks!!!, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: Starlord speaks!!!, Gareth Slee
  • Re: Starlord speaks!!!, Mij Adyaw
    • Re: Starlord speaks!!!, allisonki
      • Re: Starlord speaks!!!, Mij Adyaw
• Newbie Telescope, bhavik . modi
  • Re: Newbie Telescope, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: Newbie Telescope, Ed B.
  • Re: Newbie Telescope, Don't Be Evil
    • Re: Newbie Telescope, goodnigh
  • Re: Newbie Telescope, Bob G .
  • Re: Newbie Telescope, tony_flanders
    • Re: Newbie Telescope, Brian Tung
• Re: Sound, T.T.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sound, Martin R. Howell
    • Message not available
      • Re: Sound, Martin R. Howell
• What size bolts for LX200 Forks, Craig M . Bobchin
  • Re: What size bolts for LX200 Forks, Davoud
    • Re: What size bolts for LX200 Forks, Craig M . Bobchin
      • Re: What size bolts for LX200 Forks, Davoud
      • Re: What size bolts for LX200 Forks, Craig M . Bobchin
      • Re: What size bolts for LX200 Forks, Davoud
      • Re: What size bolts for LX200 Forks, Craig M . Bobchin
      • Re: What size bolts for LX200 Forks, Davoud
• Re: Really, really stupid question, Robin Wier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Really, really stupid question, SunSeeker
    • Re: Really, really stupid question, Eugene Griessel
  • Re: Really, really stupid question, John Savard
  • Re: Really, really stupid question, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Really, really stupid question, AM
• Surface of the Sun, Eugene Griessel
  • Re: Surface of the Sun, George
    • Re: Surface of the Sun, Eugene Griessel
  • Re: Surface of the Sun, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Surface of the Sun, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Surface of the Sun, Brian Tung
      • Re: Surface of the Sun, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Surface of the Sun, Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Surface of the Sun, Michael McCulloch
      • Re: Surface of the Sun, Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Surface of the Sun, Mij Adyaw
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Surface of the Sun, Bob Schmall
      • Re: Surface of the Sun, TBerk
      • Re: Surface of the Sun, Greg Crinklaw
      • Message not available
      • Solar oblatenes (was Re: Surface of the Sun), Bill Owen
      • Re: Solar oblatenes (was Re: Surface of the Sun), Brian Tung
      • Re: Surface of the Sun, oriel36
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Surface of the Sun, Brian Tung
• Series 5000 ED APO Refractors, reconair
  • Re: Series 5000 ED APO Refractors, Joe Bergeron
    • Re: Series 5000 ED APO Refractors, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: Series 5000 ED APO Refractors, reconair
• Who pays this bunch?, SunSeeker
  • Re: Who pays this bunch?, George
    • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, George
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Anonymous AtWork
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Brian Tung
      • Message not available
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, AM
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, ed1ward2
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Anonymous AtWork
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, ed1ward2
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, SunSeeker
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, SunSeeker
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, SunSeeker
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, ed1ward2
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, George
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, George
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Greg Crinklaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, SunSeeker
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, George
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Ioannis
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, George
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Ioannis
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, George
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Ioannis
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, SunSeeker
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: Who pays this bunch?, SunSeeker
• Re: 3 case telescope, Bob May
• WTF is this crap? Meteor to hit moon in 15 days?..., G
  • Re: WTF is this crap? Meteor to hit moon in 15 days?..., Ed T
  • Re: WTF is this crap? Meteor to hit moon in 15 days?..., Sam Wormley
    • Re: WTF is this crap? Meteor to hit moon in 15 days?..., SunSeeker
  • Re: WTF is this crap? Meteor to hit moon in 15 days?..., canopus56
• You've got 5 seconds, Martin R. Howell
  • Message not available
    • Re: You've got 5 seconds, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: You've got 5 seconds, SunSeeker
• Canon Digital Rebel--Zoom Browser Problem?, W. Watson
  • Re: Canon Digital Rebel--Zoom Browser Problem?, W. Watson
• ET's finger v the bison proms July9..., nytecam
• MN66 Collimation-better but..., Dan
  • Re: MN66 Collimation-better but..., atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: MN66 Collimation-better but..., Dan
• Seeking DSLR Advice, Tim Killian
  • Re: Seeking DSLR Advice, Davoud
  • Re: Seeking DSLR Advice, Harry James
    • Re: Seeking DSLR Advice, matt
  • Re: Seeking DSLR Advice, Sam Wormley
• Galaxies, michaelpaez
  • Re: Galaxies, Florian
    • Re: Galaxies, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Galaxies, AM
  • Re: Galaxies, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Galaxies, goodnigh
      • Re: Galaxies, Rolf Carstens
      • Re: Galaxies, goodnigh
      • Re: Galaxies, Terry B
      • Re: Galaxies, goodnigh
      • Re: Galaxies, Marty
      • Re: Galaxies, Mike Ruskai
  • Re: Galaxies, Odysseus
  • Re: Galaxies, Shawn
  • Re: Galaxies, Harry James
• Orion 6" Mak- any good?, Jason Woowaterstonist
  • OT For min, brad, doink and others, AM
  • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, Tim Killian
      • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, David Nakamoto
    • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, dan chaffee
      • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, Brian Tung
      • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, Richard Carlson
      • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, thad
      • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, Dave Mitsky
      • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, Dave Mitsky
  • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, Jason Woowaterstonist
      • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, lal_truckee
  • Re: Orion 6" Mak- any good?, laura halliday
• A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, polaris431
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, SkySea
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, AM
      • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Florian
      • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Pierre Vandevenne
      • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, solodon
      • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon..., Marty
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Alan French
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Joe S.
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Sam Wormley
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, ed1ward2
    • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, ed1ward2
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Harry James
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, AM
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brad Guth
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brad Guth
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Sam Wormley
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, lal_truckee
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, polaris431
    • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: A scientific approach to proving whether man landed on the moon - photogrammetric rectification, Brian Tung
• Help Me Decide...., reconair
  • Re: Help Me Decide...., Stephen Paul
  • Re: Help Me Decide...., Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Help Me Decide...., RMOLLISE
  • Re: Help Me Decide...., Harry James
    • Re: Help Me Decide...., Mij Adyaw
  • Re: Help Me Decide...., reconair
• Constellation Talk, SunSeeker
  • Re: Constellation Talk, Willie R . Meghar
    • Re: Constellation Talk, SkySea
      • Re: Constellation Talk, Marty
      • Re: Constellation Talk, Brian Tung
      • Re: Constellation Talk, tony_flanders
      • Re: Constellation Talk, Ioannis
  • Re: Constellation Talk, canopus56
    • Re: Constellation Talk, tony_flanders
      • Re: Constellation Talk, canopus56
      • Re: Constellation Talk, tony_flanders
      • Re: Constellation Talk, canopus56
  • Re: Constellation Talk, Harry James
  • Re: Constellation Talk, canopus56
• How long will it be before, T.T.
  • Re: How long will it be before, Eugene Griessel
    • Re: How long will it be before, Sam Wormley
      • Re: How long will it be before, Davoud
      • Re: How long will it be before, David Nakamoto
      • Re: How long will it be before, Marty
      • Re: How long will it be before, Shawn
  • Re: How long will it be before, SunSeeker
  • Re: How long will it be before, Skywise
  • Re: How long will it be before, Davoud
  • Re: How long will it be before, Starry_American
  • Re: How long will it be before, Harry James
• Re: Flying Over Tycho, Florian
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Flying Over Tycho, Mike Simmons
    • Re: Flying Over Tycho, Anthony Ayiomamitis
• Leonardo da Vinci Gay ?, Protagonist
• Galileo and solar observing, Arnold
  • Re: Galileo and solar observing, RMOLLISE
  • Re: Galileo and solar observing, William Hamblen
    • Re: Galileo and solar observing, SunSeeker
      • Re: Galileo and solar observing, Brian Tung
      • Re: Galileo and solar observing, AM
      • Re: Galileo and solar observing, Alson Wong
  • Re: Galileo and solar observing, Harry James
    • Re: Galileo and solar observing, William C. Keel
• So long!, Doink
  • Re: So long!, SunSeeker
  • Re: So long!, Mij Adyaw
    • Re: So long!, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: So long!, Anonymous AtWork
      • Message not available
      • Re: So long!, Brian Tung
      • Re: So long!, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: So long!, Stephen Paul
    • Re: So long!, Brian Tung
      • Re: So long!, Stephen Paul
      • Re: So long!, Jan Owen
      • Re: So long!, Len Philpot
      • Re: So long!, Stephen Paul
      • Re: So long!, Brian Tung
  • Re: So long!, Tom Hise
    • Re: So long!, Harry James
• Re: E.Star, Doink
• time for a dose of vitamin chill, Brian Tung
  • Re: time for a dose of vitamin chill, Doink
    • Re: time for a dose of vitamin chill, rat ~( );>
    • Re: time for a dose of vitamin chill, AM
  • Re: time for a dose of vitamin chill, Davoud
• Totally off topic, Joe S.
  • Re: Totally off topic, Doink
  • Re: Totally off topic, solodon
    • Re: Totally off topic, AM
      • Re: Totally off topic, Anonymous AtWork
      • Re: Totally off topic, ed1ward2
      • Re: Totally off topic, Joe S.
  • Re: Totally off topic, Harry James
• Mercury Systems is STILL crooked, Doink
  • Re: Mercury Systems is STILL crooked, Second That!
• Gore on Oil Sands, SunSeeker
  • Re: Gore on Oil Sands, George
  • Re: Gore on Oil Sands, Eric
    • Re: Gore on Oil Sands, Ernie Dunbar
    • Re: Gore on Oil Sands, John Savard
  • Re: Gore on Oil Sands, John Savard
    • Re: Gore on Oil Sands, Shawn
• Re: More Gore accuracy!, W. Watson
  • Re: More Gore accuracy!, Mij Adyaw
    • Re: More Gore accuracy!, SunSeeker
• Adapter for Canon Rebel EOS to Pentax Lenses, W. Watson
  • Re: Adapter for Canon Rebel EOS to Pentax Lenses, starburst
  • Re: Adapter for Canon Rebel EOS to Pentax Lenses, George
  • Re: Adapter for Canon Rebel EOS to Pentax Lenses, George
  • Re: Adapter for Canon Rebel EOS to Pentax Lenses, laura halliday
    • Re: Adapter for Canon Rebel EOS to Pentax Lenses, W. Watson
• Doinked!, G.O.D.
  • Re: Doinked!, Shawn
    • Re: Doinked!, Jan Owen
  • Re: Doinked!, starburst
    • Re: Doinked!, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Doinked!, Doink
    • Message not available
      • Re: Doinked!, Al
    • Message not available
      • Re: Doinked!, Will Parr
      • Re: Doinked!, Ioannis
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Doinked!, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: Doinked!, elaich
    • Re: Doinked!, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Doinked!, Edward Erbeck
      • Re: Doinked!, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Doinked!, elaich
  • Re: Doinked!, Doink
    • Re: Doinked!, AM
      • Re: Doinked!, SunSeeker
      • Re: Doinked!, Chuck Taylor
  • Re: Doinked!, Doink
    • Re: Doinked!, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Doinked!, Willie R . Meghar
  • Message not available
    • Re: Doinked!, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Doinked!, Brian Tung
  • Re: Doinked!, Al
• Shuttle rotation, SunSeeker
  • Re: Shuttle rotation, Shawn
  • Message not available
    • Re: Shuttle rotation, SunSeeker
      • Re: Shuttle rotation, Morris Jones
  • Re: Shuttle rotation, Joe S.
  • Re: Shuttle rotation, William Hamblen
    • Re: Shuttle rotation, SunSeeker
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shuttle rotation, SunSeeker
      • Re: Shuttle rotation, AustinMN
      • Re: Shuttle rotation, Al
    • Re: Shuttle rotation, pslipscomb
• Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, Rich
  • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, SunSeeker
  • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, William Hamblen
  • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, starburst
      • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, William Hamblen
      • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, Stephen Paul
      • Re: Adapting SCT focal reducers to small apos, Stephen Paul
• Need focuser recommendations, kwilson
  • Re: Need focuser recommendations, Doink
  • Re: Need focuser recommendations, George
    • Re: Need focuser recommendations, Anonymous AtWork
      • Re: Need focuser recommendations, George
• Summer JDSO is now ready for download!, RMOLLISE
• MN66 collimation- star pattern, Dan
  • Re: MN66 collimation- star pattern, Dan
  • Re: MN66 collimation- star pattern, MitchAlsup
    • Re: MN66 collimation- star pattern, Dan
  • Re: MN66 collimation- star pattern, Doink
  • Re: MN66 collimation- star pattern, atasselli@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: MN66 collimation- star pattern, Dan
• Meaning of LIFE ????, Protagonist
  • Re: Meaning of LIFE ????, Stephen Paul
    • Re: Meaning of LIFE ????, Protagonist
  • Re: Meaning of LIFE ????, zaph
• Nytecam..., Doink
• Macintosh software Celestron telescope guiding, k . montgomery1
  • Re: Macintosh software Celestron telescope guiding, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Macintosh software Celestron telescope guiding, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Macintosh software Celestron telescope guiding, k . montgomery1
      • Re: Macintosh software Celestron telescope guiding, Milton Aupperle
      • Re: Macintosh software Celestron telescope guiding, AM
  • Re: Macintosh software Celestron telescope guiding, RMOLLISE
• ANN: Release of LunarPhase Pro Version 3 [Moon Observer's Toolkit], nsosupport
• Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, Craig M . Bobchin
  • Re: Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, William R. Mattil
    • Re: Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, Craig M . Bobchin
      • Re: Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, Craig M . Bobchin
      • Re: Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, Doink
  • Re: Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, Steve Sherman
    • Re: Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, Craig M . Bobchin
      • Re: Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, Steve Sherman
      • Re: Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, Craig M . Bobchin
      • Re: Losmandy G-11 vs Celestron CG-11 vs Celestron CGE, Stephen Paul
• Telescope to HD television, Richard
  • Re: Telescope to HD television, Chris L Peterson
  • Re: Telescope to HD television, Davoud
  • Re: Telescope to HD television, Steve Sherman
    • Re: Telescope to HD television, SkySea
      • Re: Telescope to HD television, Sjouke Burry
  • Re: Telescope to HD television, Dave Mitsky
  • Re: Telescope to HD television, Dave Mitsky
• trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25, The Partridgefamily
  • Re: trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25, Roger Hamlett
  • Re: trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25, Willie R . Meghar
    • Re: trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25, Willie R . Meghar
    • Re: trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25, SunSeeker
      • Re: trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25, The Partridgefamily
  • Re: trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25, Bob May
  • Re: trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25, Stephen Paul
  • Re: trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25, Stephen Paul
  • Re: trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25 **UPDATE**, The Partridgefamily
    • Re: trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25 **UPDATE**, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25 **UPDATE**, SunSeeker
  • Re: trying to determine scope's focal length, C9.25, William Hamblen
• Relaxed planning laws = easier on astronomers?, nytecam
• Apollo landings, Hugh Janus
  • Re: Apollo landings, George
    • Re: Apollo landings, Al
      • Re: Apollo landings, George
  • Re: Apollo landings, Cameltoe Johnson
  • Re: Apollo landings, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Apollo landings, Morris Jones
    • Re: Apollo landings, ed1ward2
  • Re: Apollo landings, T.T.
  • Re: Apollo landings, William Hamblen
  • Re: Apollo landings, Brad Guth
    • Re: Apollo landings, SunSeeker
      • Re: Apollo landings, Odysseus
    • Re: Apollo landings, Cameltoe Johnson
      • Re: Apollo landings, Brad Guth
    • Re: Apollo landings, Secret237
      • Re: Apollo landings, Roger Hamlett
      • Re: Apollo landings, David Nakamoto
      • Re: Apollo landings, William Hamblen
      • Re: Apollo landings, Johnny Borborigmi
      • Re: Apollo landings, Joe Bergeron
  • Re: Apollo landings, Second That!
  • Re: Apollo landings, Scott Miller
• Celestron's 6" SCT, another ringer like the 9.25"?, Rich
  • Re: Celestron's 6" SCT, another ringer like the 9.25"?, RMOLLISE
• 2006 Cherry Springs Star Party Photos, Dave Mitsky
  • Re: 2006 Cherry Springs Star Party Photos, RMOLLISE
    • Re: 2006 Cherry Springs Star Party Photos, Dave Mitsky
      • Re: 2006 Cherry Springs Star Party Photos, Dave Mitsky
    • Re: 2006 Cherry Springs Star Party Photos, Dave Mitsky
• Re: LONG-LOST VIDEO -- MAN'S FIRST STEP ON THE MOON -- Mistakes DO Happen!, Chuck Taylor
• Actual on topic post..., Doink
  • Re: Actual on topic post..., Brian Tung
    • Re: Actual on topic post..., Doink
      • Re: Actual on topic post..., Willie R . Meghar
      • Re: Actual on topic post..., Doink
      • Re: Actual on topic post..., Stephen Paul
      • Re: Actual on topic post..., Willie R . Meghar
    • Re: Actual on topic post..., Doink
      • Re: Actual on topic post..., Brian Tung
      • Re: Actual on topic post..., Doink
      • Re: Actual on topic post..., oriel36
      • Re: Actual on topic post..., benk
      • Re: Actual on topic post..., Brian Tung
      • Re: Actual on topic post..., oriel36
      • Re: Actual on topic post..., SkySea
• The PST and making money, SunSeeker
  • Re: The PST and making money, Doink
    • Re: The PST and making money, Brian Tung
    • Re: The PST and making money, RMOLLISE
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: The PST and making money, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: The PST and making money, AM
  • Re: The PST and making money, Sam Wormley
    • Re: The PST and making money, Doink
      • Re: The PST and making money, Sam Wormley
      • Re: The PST and making money, Doink
      • Re: The PST and making money, Sam Wormley
      • Re: The PST and making money, SunSeeker
      • Re: The PST and making money, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: The PST and making money, Doink
      • Re: The PST and making money, Joe S.
      • Re: The PST and making money, Joe S.
      • Re: The PST and making money, Chuck Taylor
      • Re: The PST and making money, SunSeeker
      • Re: The PST and making money, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: The PST and making money, Martin R. Howell
    • Re: The PST and making money, Doink
      • Re: The PST and making money, RMOLLISE
      • Re: The PST and making money, Phil Wheeler
  • Re: The PST and making money, Martin Brown
  • Re: The PST and making money, Professor Marvel
  • Re: The PST and making money, Mean Mr Mustard
  • Re: The PST and making money, Alan French
    • Re: The PST and making money, ed1ward2
      • Re: The PST and making money, SunSeeker
  • Re: The PST and making money, Joe Bergeron
  • Message not available
    • Re: The PST and making money, SunSeeker
      • Re: The PST and making money, Brian Tung
  • Re: The PST and making money, Pierre Vandevenne
  • Re: The PST and making money, Second That!
    • Re: The PST and making money, Mij Adyaw
      • Re: The PST and making money, Harry James
      • Re: The PST and making money, Joe Bergeron
      • Re: The PST and making money, Alan French
      • Re: The PST and making money, SunSeeker
      • Re: The PST and making money, Mij Adyaw
  • Re: The PST and making money, chris evans
• Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Ken
  • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Fred Oinka
  • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., kapella1
  • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Davoud
    • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Ken
      • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Davoud
      • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Second That!
  • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Sam Wormley
    • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., SunSeeker
  • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Doink
  • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Martin Brown
    • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., SunSeeker
  • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Johnny Borborigmi
  • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Anonymous AtWork
    • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Second That!
  • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Second That!
    • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Ken
      • Re: Is this a Meteorite? Help Please., Harry James
• A link between solar activity and earth buffeting caused earthquakes on www.electricquakes.com ?,,This site has some pretty cool grpahics and you can monitor changes in earth spin and solar activity and earthquakes to visually see any correlations.,Pretty cool., geo
• Re: help me please !!!, laura halliday
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: help me please !!!, esmartguy
• Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, RMOLLISE
  • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, Fuzzy_American
    • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, Fuzzy_American
      • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, Martin R. Howell
      • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, Brian Tung
      • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, Ed T
      • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, Ed T
      • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, Starry_American
    • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, AM
      • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, Starry_American
      • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, AM
      • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, Pierre Vandevenne
  • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, Art
  • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, David McKee
    • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, RMOLLISE
      • Re: Back Issues of Rod's Skywatch Newsletter are Back!, David McKee
• 2004 XP14 Observed near Santa Cruz, Calif, Regina Roper
  • Re: 2004 XP14 Observed near Santa Cruz, Calif, Regina Roper
  • Re: 2004 XP14 Observed near Santa Cruz, Calif, Regina Roper
• Re: Place to find binaries?, Art
• Happy Aphelion!, laura halliday
  • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Paul Schlyter
      • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Phil Wheeler
      • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Brian Tung
      • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Davoud
      • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Paul Schlyter
  • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Brian Tung
    • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Howard Lester
  • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Davoud
  • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Don't Be Evil
    • Re: Happy Aphelion!, laura halliday
  • Message not available
    • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Sam Wormley
  • Message not available
    • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Sam Wormley
  • Message not available
    • Re: Happy Aphelion!, Paul Schlyter
  • Re: Happy Aphelion!, johnschiap
• OT: New Star Car, Davoud
  • Re: OT: New Star Car, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: OT: New Star Car, Davoud
  • Re: OT: New Star Car, RMOLLISE
  • Re: OT: New Star Car, starburst
  • Re: OT: New Star Car, Ed Holden
    • Re: OT: New Star Car, Davoud
• 2004 XP14 sightings?, Brian Tung
  • Re: 2004 XP14 sightings?, Dennis Woos
    • Re: 2004 XP14 sightings?, tmnathe
      • Re: 2004 XP14 sightings?, Brian Tung
      • Re: 2004 XP14 sightings?, tmnathe
      • Re: 2004 XP14 sightings?, George
      • Re: 2004 XP14 sightings?, tmnathe
      • Re: 2004 XP14 sightings?, tmnathe
  • Re: 2004 XP14 sightings?, ed1ward2
  • Re: 2004 XP14 sightings?, William Hamblen
    • Re: 2004 XP14 sightings?, George
  • Re: 2004 XP14 sightings?, Shawn
• Temperature signatures of axial and orbital motion, oriel36
  • Message not available
    • Re: Temperature signatures of axial and orbital motion, starburst
      • Re: Temperature signatures of axial and orbital motion, Ed T
  • Message not available
    • Re: Temperature signatures of axial and orbital motion, oriel36
      • Message not available
      • Re: Temperature signatures of axial and orbital motion, oriel36
• Observatory placement - against all advice., July 5th
  • Re: Observatory placement - against all advice., Fred Scharmann
    • Re: Observatory placement - against all advice., July 5th
  • Re: Observatory placement - against all advice., Davoud
  • Re: Observatory placement - against all advice., Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Observatory placement - against all advice., July 5th
  • Re: Observatory placement - against all advice., Doink
    • Re: Observatory placement - against all advice., Second That!
• Re: Multiple bogus Jovian moons, July 5th
• Re: C5+ pages updated, Harry F . Leopold
• S&T 2004XP14 Charts off by 10 mins?, Dennis Woos
  • Re: S&T 2004XP14 Charts off by 10 mins?, canopus56
    • Re: S&T 2004XP14 Charts off by 10 mins?, Brian Tung
      • Re: S&T 2004XP14 Charts off by 10 mins?, canopus56
  • Re: S&T 2004XP14 Charts off by 10 mins?, Brian Tung
    • Re: S&T 2004XP14 Charts off by 10 mins?, Brian Tung
• O, Canada......, Matthew Ota
  • Re: O, Canada......, Davoud
  • Re: O, Canada......, John Savard
    • Re: O, Canada......, pussy-galore
  • Re: O, Canada......, laura halliday
• Lookin Bad for launch, Starz-galore
  • Re: Lookin Bad for launch, Martin R. Howell
    • Re: Lookin Bad for launch, Howard Lester
  • Re: Lookin Bad for launch, Ed T
    • Re: Lookin Bad for launch, pussy-galore
      • Re: Lookin Bad for launch, Martin R. Howell
• Pres. Bush-lame duck, Starz-galore
  • Re: Pres. Bush-lame duck, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Pres. Bush-lame duck, Starz-galore
      • Re: Pres. Bush-lame duck, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Pres. Bush-lame duck, Fuzzy_Stars
      • Re: Pres. Bush-lame duck, Starz-galore
      • Re: Pres. Bush-lame duck, Fuzzy_Stars
  • Re: Pres. Bush-lame duck, Fuzzy_Stars
• Re: Babe, Ann Coulter: Still Bomb N.Y. Times - "We would stone Henry Hyde to death" --Alec Baldwin, AM
• Camera on Space Telescope Is Repaired, Rick Evans
  • Re: Camera on Space Telescope Is Repaired, John Savard
• Some photos of Dobson's Dobsonian, and a little more., Uncle Bob
  • Re: Some photos of Dobson's Dobsonian, and a little more., scribe2b
  • Re: Some photos of Dobson's Dobsonian, and a little more., George Normandin
• Re: Moderator for this group, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: Missed the GRS, JOHN PAZMINO
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Missed the GRS, JOHN PAZMINO
  • Re: Missed the GRS, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: Jovian moon observation, JOHN PAZMINO
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Jovian moon observation, laura halliday
    • Re: Jovian moon observation, Brian Tung
  • Re: Jovian moon observation, canopus56
  • Re: Jovian moon observation, DSmithdale
• Re: I need s.a.a advice., JOHN PAZMINO
  • Re: I need s.a.a advice., Pieter Litchfield
• Re: DSOs Deserving of Yearly, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: Definition of a planet, JOHN PAZMINO
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Definition of a planet, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: S&T C-6 Review, JOHN PAZMINO
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: S&T C-6 Review, JOHN PAZMINO
  • Re: S&T C-6 Review, JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: Avoid Mercury System., JOHN PAZMINO
• Re: another physics article, JOHN PAZMINO
  • Re: another physics article, oriel36
• Re: Amateur research?, JOHN PAZMINO
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Amateur research?, Ed Majden
• Re: Large meteor strikes, JOHN PAZMINO
• A new idea for fighting light pollution?, Ernie Dunbar
  • Re: A new idea for fighting light pollution?, eddie
    • Re: A new idea for fighting light pollution?, Florian
      • Re: A new idea for fighting light pollution?, thad
      • Re: A new idea for fighting light pollution?, dk
    • Re: A new idea for fighting light pollution?, Ernie Dunbar
  • Re: A new idea for fighting light pollution?, dk
  • Re: A new idea for fighting light pollution?, Dan Mckenna
  • Re: A new idea for fighting light pollution?, Greg Crinklaw
    • Re: A new idea for fighting light pollution?, Marty
  • Re: A new idea for fighting light pollution?, GFY
• cosmic Log on UFO's, interesting, The Hammered Astronomer
• Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, james
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, Trane Francks
    • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, Rich
    • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, Mean Mr Mustard
      • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, RichIsaTroll
      • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, Mean Mr Mustard
      • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, Bob Schmall
      • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, dougspeterson
      • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, dougspeterson
      • Re: Scopetronix Defunct?, Mean Mr Mustard
• Mercury systems ---crooks, Doink
  • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, RMOLLISE
    • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, Doink
      • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, Tom Hise
      • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, Doink
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, Doink
      • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, William R. Mattil
      • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, Howard Lester
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, Doink
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, Martin R. Howell
  • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, Joe S.
  • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, Stephen Paul
  • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, Florian
    • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, Doink
      • Re: Mercury systems ---crooks, Stephen Paul
• Re: Clouds, nytecam
• PST homepage update..., nytecam
  • Re: PST homepage update..., canopus56
• Re: Jupiter from the Trailer Park, AM
• Re: Coloured objects list?, AM
• Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
    • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Chris L Peterson
    • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Dennis Woos
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
    • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
    • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Second That!
  • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
    • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
    • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, William Hamblen
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Brian Tung
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, Ioannis
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, EdZ
      • Re: Magnification needed to split tight doubles, canopus56
• Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., eddie
  • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., Ed Holden
    • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., dk
  • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., dk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., dk
    • Re: And not a WORD about fighting light pollution in this...., Brian Tung
• planisphere for light-polluted skies?, Brian Tung
  • Re: planisphere for light-polluted skies?, thad
    • Re: planisphere for light-polluted skies?, Marty
• Re: what was the trigger?, Shelldigger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Ioannis
  • Re: what was the trigger?, SkySea
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Marty
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Pat O'Connell
  • Re: what was the trigger?, Stephen Paul
• Re: help with reference books list, Marty
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: help with reference books list, Bob May
  • Re: help with reference books list, tony_flanders
• New "Superman" on "Bad Astronomy.", Rich
  • Re: New "Superman" on "Bad Astronomy.", eddie
    • Re: New "Superman" on "Bad Astronomy.", John Savard
    • Re: New "Superman" on "Bad Astronomy.", Chris L Peterson
      • Re: New "Superman" on "Bad Astronomy.", oriel36
      • Re: New "Superman" on "Bad Astronomy.", Chris L Peterson
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: New "Superman" on "Bad Astronomy.", Brian Tung
      • Re: New "Superman" on "Bad Astronomy.", Shawn
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: New "Superman" on "Bad Astronomy.", Phil Wheeler
  • Re: New "Superman" on "Bad Astronomy.", John Savard
• Dimming Down Red Headlight, fleemo17
  • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, jtaylor
    • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, Florian
      • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, thad
      • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, Florian
  • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, Doink
    • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, Ernie Dunbar
      • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, Phil Wheeler
    • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, AM
  • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, Al
  • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, Marc Heusser
    • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, Chris L Peterson
      • Re: Dimming Down Red Headlight, fleemo17
• Re: GCSP_Observing_Report_South_Rim_Day_Seven, Joe Bergeron
• Re: AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE'S MOVIE, Joe Bergeron
  • Re: AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE'S MOVIE, Jan Owen
• Re: The Ordeal, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Ordeal, Martin R. Howell

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

sci.tech-archive.net  > Archive  > sci.astro.amateur  > 2006-07