Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- From: Chris L Peterson <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:35:12 GMT
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 22:51:15 +0100, Dr John Stockton
<jrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't think that oriel36 understands that Leap Years deal with the
(substantially constant) non-integer part of the ratio between the
Earth's orbital and rotational periods...
As near as I can tell, oriel36 considers anything non-integral in the
Earth's orbital or rotational periods to be nothing but fabrications by
modern astronomers.
A more accurate statement would be "I don't think that oriel36
understands."
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- From: oriel36
- Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- From: Richard F.L.R.Snashall
- Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- From: Dr John Stockton
- NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- Prev by Date: Re: Focusing Nikon D50
- Next by Date: Re: Strange artifacts with Nikon CoolPix 2200
- Previous by thread: Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- Next by thread: Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- Index(es):
Loading