Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- From: "Richard F.L.R.Snashall" <rflrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:09:39 -0400
Dr John Stockton wrote:
But, of course, neither Pope nor King introduced quadrennial Leap Years;If we really think we know the length of a year, shouldn't the rule
they introduced the omission of a specified 3% of what would have been
Leap Years under the rules then extant. It was G Julius Caesar,
Imperator and future assassinee, who introduced (in principle)
quadrennial Leap Years; and one of his successors a generation or so
later who got the implementation corrected.
be "365 days except every fourth, except every twenty-fifth, except
every fourth, except every eighth, except every hundred forty fourth"? All I've ever were the first three exceptions.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- From: Dr John Stockton
- Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- References:
- NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- From: oriel36
- Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- From: Llanzlan Klazmon
- Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- From: Dr John Stockton
- NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- Prev by Date: Space Weather News for July 21, 2006
- Next by Date: Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- Previous by thread: Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- Next by thread: Re: NO positive leap second will be introduced at the end of December 2006
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|