Re: Planet Definition Revisited
- From: brian@xxxxxxx (Brian Tung)
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
Richard Jarnagin wrote:
Planet definition -- Just use mass with Pluto as the standard. Throw in the
barycenter stipulation to define satellites. Simple?
Simple yet arbitrary. Of course, I also feel that way about the
proposed IAU definition, except that that one is a bit less simple, and
also less arbitrary.
--
Brian Tung <brian@xxxxxxx>
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Planet Definition Revisited
- From: Richard F.L.R.Snashall
- Re: Planet Definition Revisited
- From: Richard Jarnagin
- Re: Planet Definition Revisited
- References:
- Planet Definition Revisited
- From: Richard Jarnagin
- Planet Definition Revisited
- Prev by Date: Re: YADOP: Yet Another Definition of Planet (repost)
- Next by Date: Re: Not quite a star, but almost
- Previous by thread: Planet Definition Revisited
- Next by thread: Re: Planet Definition Revisited
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|