Re: Planet Definition Revisited

Richard Jarnagin wrote:
As you seem to have noticed, all choices of a "dividing line" are
arbitrary, and indeed must be by the very nature of forming a
definition.

Well, I wouldn't go that far. There are places in nature where a
dividing line is natural, and is justified by the way it clarifies the
work of those who specialize in that area. But I agree that I don't see
such a natural dividing line here. No matter how we draw a line, there
will be objects that straddle it--or so it seems at the present.

--
Brian Tung <brian@xxxxxxx>
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Planet Definition Revisited
    ... I thought it was clear that I was referring to the situation at hand, ... There are places in nature where a ... such a natural dividing line here. ... The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: A few thoughts on GOF and HBP (spoilers)
    ... Kish wrote: ... a character asks the computer to ... describe the nature of the universe--a question the computer should be ... The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)