Re: Pluto vote 'hijacked' in revolt
- From: brian@xxxxxxx (Brian Tung)
- Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Schlyter wrote:
You can't make an accurate theory for one planet and ignore all the
other planets - they affect one another mutually. So when making a theory
for one of the planets, you have to account for several others of them,
sometimes all of them depending on what accuracy you want.
Perhaps, although my impression was that these dependencies are already
factored into each theory--that is, you don't *have* to compute Uranus's
position, for instance, in order to compute Saturn's. Is that not so?
--
Brian Tung <brian@xxxxxxx>
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pluto vote 'hijacked' in revolt
- From: Paul Schlyter
- Re: Pluto vote 'hijacked' in revolt
- References:
- Re: Pluto vote 'hijacked' in revolt
- From: Paul Schlyter
- Re: Pluto vote 'hijacked' in revolt
- From: Brian Tung
- Re: Pluto vote 'hijacked' in revolt
- From: Paul Schlyter
- Re: Pluto vote 'hijacked' in revolt
- Prev by Date: Re: Under what?
- Next by Date: Re: Red stars (observation report)
- Previous by thread: Re: Pluto vote 'hijacked' in revolt
- Next by thread: Re: Pluto vote 'hijacked' in revolt
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|