Re: Canon Rebel XT, Nikon D50 or Pentax K100 best?
- From: Chris L Peterson <clp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:36:23 GMT
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 20:48:59 +0200, Iordani <somewhere@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is news to me. Can you explain what the ISO setting does?
A pointer to some more info would also be valuable.
I tried google but found nothing appropriate.
The ISO value is a measure of the gain applied to the output amplifier.
In all cases I'm aware of this is done after the sensor is read, but in
principle it could be done inside the sensor, which could provide some
moderate advantage in terms of readout noise.
Astronomical cameras have a gain chosen to provide a good match between
the number of electrons each pixel can store and the number of bits the
A/D converter uses. In the simplest case, you want a full pixel to
produce a full count from the A/D.
In astronomical image, the intrinsic noise is determined by the number
of photons collected (the noise is the square root of the photon count).
When you increase the gain, you increase the signal and the noise the
same amount. That's why unfiltered, high ISO images are noisy. It also
means that any bright sources in your image will saturate much earlier.
High ISO astronomical images may show larger stars because of this. When
you are processing a raw image, it makes no difference if a pixel has a
value of 100 ± 10 or 400 ± 40. You could as well multiply all the pixels
of an ISO 100 image by 4 after the fact as to shoot it at ISO 400.
Well, almost. The difference is that if you can reduce the number of
subframes you need, you can reduce the total contribution of readout
noise. By boosting the gain at the sensor you can pull the lowest level
signal a little higher above the quantization noise.
With the 300D, I've done detailed noise measurements. What I found is
that there is no difference in noise between a 300s exposure at ISO 100
and a 150s exposure at ISO 200. But a 75s exposure at ISO 400 has more
noise, and a 37.5s exposure at ISO 800 has even more, and this trend
continues at ISO 1600 and ISO 3200 (the highest the camera goes).
So clearly the best place to operate this camera is ISO 200. However,
the noise at ISO 400 is only a little higher, so I use that for shots
where a longer exposure might be a problem.
A good camera is an efficient photon counter, recording 50% or more of
all that hit it. From a signal processing standpoint, there is no reason
to artificially multiply that number by anything. You just need to find
the value for a specific camera that gives the best results- probably
between one and two counts per photon.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Canon Rebel XT, Nikon D50 or Pentax K100 best?
- From: Pierre Vandevennne
- Re: Canon Rebel XT, Nikon D50 or Pentax K100 best?
- From: Iordani
- Re: Canon Rebel XT, Nikon D50 or Pentax K100 best?
- References:
- Re: Canon Rebel XT, Nikon D50 or Pentax K100 best?
- From: SW
- Re: Canon Rebel XT, Nikon D50 or Pentax K100 best?
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: Canon Rebel XT, Nikon D50 or Pentax K100 best?
- From: Iordani
- Re: Canon Rebel XT, Nikon D50 or Pentax K100 best?
- Prev by Date: Help me understand Foucault's pendulum?
- Next by Date: Re: Pluto kooks make the ultimate appeal
- Previous by thread: Re: Canon Rebel XT, Nikon D50 or Pentax K100 best?
- Next by thread: Re: Canon Rebel XT, Nikon D50 or Pentax K100 best?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|