Re: guiding relays vs scope controls
- From: "Roger Hamlett" <rogerspamignored@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 08:28:19 GMT
"Pierre Vandevennne" <pierre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9838128D0648Epierredatarescue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I seem to have problems with the autoguiding relays of my sbig camera.How 'good' software guiding is, depends largely on your mount controller.
Haven't really objectivated the issue but it shows up with two different
mounts using two different cables, so I guess there not much room for
doubt.
I have therefore switched my guiding from guider relays to telescope
control. Is the performance going to be markedly different? So far,
everything is fine, but I am using a very short focal length (540mm) and
have had to cut the aggressivness in half, all other things being equal.
'Relay' guiding (actually only a real 'relay' on the ST4, and similar
guiders, while on the SBIG cameras a 'pull down' transistor), gives less
'latency' (the mount is being controlled almost immediately, instead of
having to wait for a longer serial command). How long the latency for
serial guiding is, depends on the 'command set' of your mount. The
original LX200, had a 'reasonable' nudge command. The latter GPS units,
dropped this, and for a while gave poor responses, and then an
'undocumented' nudge command in a slightly different form was found, and
now the control is generally good. Similarly, some other makes of scope,
have better or worse nudge/move commands, with varying degrees of quality,
and in some cases, a much slower 'move' command has to be used, often with
relatively slow response, and poor accuracy. As another example, the Vixen
SS2K, 'rounds' the position numbers fed from a serial command, and you
cannot actually nudge to the resolution of the controller, with the serial
control. However for shorter focal length scopes, both still work OK on
this mount, and this only gives problems at high image scales.
Though you have the system working, you do really need to find out what is
wrong with the direct control. A number of questions/comments apply.
First, some mounts need to be in the right 'mode' to respond to the guider
input. For example, the Gemini controller, ignores the guide input, unless
the controller is in 'photo', or 'all speeds' mode. Then check the actual
pinout on the cable. Different cables are needed for some mounts (the
Vixen SS2K, for example, does require a custom cable). Also some
controllers do actually require a relay, or opto-coupler (on the Losmandy
Gemini for example, the 'older' version, with telephone style motor
connectors, requires the guider pins to be pulled 'up', not 'down' as the
SBIG camera generates - this requires a relay adaper to work, and
connecting without this, can damage the controller or camera). Also note
that the correct cable, is normally a 'crossover' cable (pin1 to pin6),
not a straight through cable.
Best Wishes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: guiding relays vs scope controls
- From: Chris L Peterson
- Re: guiding relays vs scope controls
- References:
- guiding relays vs scope controls
- From: Pierre Vandevennne
- guiding relays vs scope controls
- Prev by Date: Re: Canon Rebel XT, Nikon D50 or Pentax K100 best?
- Next by Date: Re: Anyone watch NOVA's 'Mars: Dead or Alive'?
- Previous by thread: Re: guiding relays vs scope controls
- Next by thread: Re: guiding relays vs scope controls
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|